SILValue.h/.cpp just defines the SIL base classes. Referring to specific instructions is a (small) kind of layering violation.
Also I want to keep SILValue small so that it is really just a type alias of ValueBase*.
NFC.
As there are no instructions left which produce multiple result values, this is a NFC regarding the generated SIL and generated code.
Although this commit is large, most changes are straightforward adoptions to the changes in the ValueBase and SILValue classes.
This reverts commit 81e7bdfe1b.
This is not true in non-loop canonicalized SIL. It is true in loop-canonicalized
SIL though. So I need to fix the test to avoid the assert.
Correct format:
```
//===--- Name of file - Description ----------------------------*- Lang -*-===//
```
Notes:
* Comment line should be exactly 80 chars.
* Padding: Pad with dashes after "Description" to reach 80 chars.
* "Name of file", "Description" and "Lang" are all optional.
* In case of missing "Lang": drop the "-*-" markers.
* In case of missing space: drop one, two or three dashes before "Name of file".
If we use a shared valueenumerator, imagine the case when one of the AAcache or MBcache
is cleared and we clear the valueenumerator.
This could give rise to collisions (false positives) in the not-yet-cleared cache!
I need this for loop-arc since I need to be able to analyze all "loop-exits"
when I just have the parent loop region. We are already computing this
information and throwing it away, so there should be no compile time impact.
(libraries now)
It has been generally agreed that we need to do this reorg, and now
seems like the perfect time. Some major pass reorganization is in the
works.
This does not have to be the final word on the matter. The consensus
among those working on the code is that it's much better than what we
had and a better starting point for future bike shedding.
Note that the previous organization was designed to allow separate
analysis and optimization libraries. It turns out this is an
artificial distinction and not an important goal.
(Headers first)
It has been generally agreed that we need to do this reorg, and now
seems like the perfect time. Some major pass reorganization is in the
works.
This does not have to be the final word on the matter. The consensus
among those working on the code is that it's much better than what we
had and a better starting point for future bike shedding.
Note that the previous organization was designed to allow separate
analysis and optimization libraries. It turns out this is an
artificial distinction and not an important goal.
