As the optimizer uses more and more AST stuff, it's now time to create an "AST" module.
Initially it defines following AST datastructures:
* declarations: `Decl` + derived classes
* `Conformance`
* `SubstitutionMap`
* `Type` and `CanonicalType`
Some of those were already defined in the SIL module and are now moved to the AST module.
This change also cleans up a few things:
* proper definition of `NominalTypeDecl`-related APIs in `SIL.Type`
* rename `ProtocolConformance` to `Conformance`
* use `AST.Type`/`AST.CanonicalType` instead of `BridgedASTType` in SIL and the Optimizer
Usually there _must_ be a read from a consuming in-argument, because the function has to consume the argument.
But in the special case if all control paths end up in an `unreachable`, the consuming read might have been dead-code eliminated.
Therefore make sure to add the read-effect in any case. Otherwise it can result in memory lifetime failures at a call site.
fixes a memory lifetime failure
rdar://134881045
Make SILLInkage available in SIL as `SIL.Linkage`.
Also, rename the misleading Function and GlobalVariable ABI `isAvailableExternally` to `isDefinedExternally`
This corresponds to the parameter-passing convention of the Itanium C++
ABI, in which the argument is passed indirectly and possibly modified,
but not destroyed, by the callee.
@in_cxx is handled the same way as @in in callers and @in_guaranteed in
callees. OwnershipModelEliminator emits the call to destroy_addr that is
needed to destroy the argument in the caller.
rdar://122707697
by -enable-experimental-feature NonescapableTypes
on the Windows platform
These passes do nothing unless the above feature flag is enabled, so
the only reason to run the pass is to exercise SwiftCompilerSources
and catch invalid SIL.
These passes rely on fundamental SwiftCompilerSources abstractions
which have not yet been tested outside of the passes. They don't yet
handle all SIL patterns, and SIL continues to evolve. We would like to
can these issues quickly as we hit them, but only if we have a way of
reproducing the failure. Currently, we don't have a way of reproducing
Windows-arm64 failures.
Workaround for:
rdar://128434000 ([nonescapable] [LifetimeDependenceInsertion]
Package resolution fails with arm64 Windows toolchain)
The OSSA elimination pass has not yet been moved below all high level
function passes. Until that work has been completed the Autodiff
closure-spec optimization pass cannot solely support OSSA instructions.
The buffer of global arrays could already be statically initialized.
The missing piece was the array itself, which is basically a reference to the array buffer.
For example:
```
var a = [1, 2, 3]
```
ends up in two statically initialized globals:
1. the array buffer, which contains the elements
2. the variable `a` which is a single reference (= pointer) of the array buffer
This optimization removes the need for lazy initialization of such variables.
rdar://127757554
If an argument escapes in a called function, we don't know anything about the argument's side effects.
For example, it could escape to the return value and effects might occur in the caller.
Fixes a miscompile
https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/73477
rdar://127691335
Changes in this CR add part of the, Swift based, Autodiff specific
closure specialization optimization pass. The pass does not modify any
code nor does it even exist in any of the optimization pipelines. The
rationale for pushing this partially complete optimization pass upstream
is to keep up with the breaking changes in the underlying Swift based
compiler infrastructure.
ClosureLifetimeFixup now emits mark_dependence [nonescaping]. Those should be
ignored by diagnostics. In the capture case, the dependence has already been
resolved, and may not match the SIL patterns that we expect for source-level
lifetime dependencies.
Fixes rdar://125375685 ([nonescapable] Fix lifetime-dependence diagnostics in the stdlib)
Don't treat StoreBorrow addresses as unknown bases. While they are never the base of a formal access, they are returned
as the AccessBase when querying the enclosing scope of an address.
SILBoxTypes have their own generic signature and substitution
map. This means that every time we query isEscapable or mayEscape, we
need to extract the type of the box's field and perform type
substitution so that the AST query only sees types from the function's
generic environment.
Fixes rdar://124179106 (Assertion failed in SIL:
(!type->hasTypeParameter() && "caller forgot to mapTypeIntoContext!"))
