This is consistent with `Type.isTrivial`.
Also, introduce corresponding properties in `Value`: `hasTrivialType` and `hasTrivialNonPointerType`, because
1. It's less to type than `Type.isTrivial(in: function)` because `Value` knows in which function it is.
2. It fixes the corner case where value is an `Undef`, which has not parent function.
This invalidation kind is used when a compute-effects pass changes function effects.
Also, let optimization passes which don't change effects only invalidate the `FunctionBody` and not `Everything`.
Functions "are deinit barriers" (more pedantically, applies of functions
are deinit barriers) if any of their instructions are deinit barriers.
During side-effect analysis, when walking a function's instructions for
other global effects, also check for the deinit-barrier effect. If an
instruction is found to be a deinit barrier, mark the function's global
effects accordingly.
Add SILFunction::isDeinitBarrier to conveniently access the effects
computed during ComputeSideEffects.
Update the isBarrierApply predicate to iterate over the list of callees,
if complete, to check whether any is a deinit barrier. If none is, then
the apply is not a deinit barrier.
Added new C++-to-Swift callback for isDeinitBarrier.
And pass it CalleeAnalysis so it can depend on function effects. For
now, the argument is ignored. And, all callers just pass nullptr.
Promoted to API the mayAccessPointer component predicate of
isDeinitBarrier which needs to remain in C++. That predicate will also
depends on function effects. For that reason, it too is now passed a
BasicCalleeAnalysis and is moved into SILOptimizer.
Also, added more conservative versions of isDeinitBarrier and
maySynchronize which will never consider side-effects.
Computes the side effects for a function, which consists of argument- and global effects.
This is similar to the ComputeEscapeEffects pass, just for side-effects.
So far, function effects only included escape effects.
This change adds side-effects (but they are not computed, yet).
It also involves refactoring of the existing escape effects.
Also the SIL effect syntax changed a bit. Details are in docs/SIL.rst
And simplify it.
This struct is not really needed by clients. It's just needed internally in 'Value.accessPath` (and similar properties) to compute the access path.
Dead-end blocks are blocks from which there is no path to the function exit (`return`, `throw` or unwind).
These are blocks which end with an unreachable instruction and blocks from which all paths end in "unreachable" blocks.
Let's lldb's `po` command not print any "internal" properties of the conforming type.
This is useful if the `description` already contains all the information of a type instance.
Replace the `struct EscapeInfo` with a simpler API, just consisting of methods of `ProjectedValue` and `Value`:
* `isEscaping()`
* `isAddressEscaping()`
* `visit()`
* `visitAddress()`
A projected value consists of the original value and a projection path.
For example, if the `value` is of type `struct S { var x: Int }` and `path` is `s0`, then the projected value represents field `x` of the original value.
Also, use ProjectedValue instead of AccessStoragePath.
If there are no more than 2 elements in the cache, we can avoid using the `cache` Dictionary, which avoids memory allocations.
Fortunately this is the common case by far (about 97% of all walker invocations).
For two reasons:
* We also like to check for assert failures in release builds. Although this could be achieved with `precondition`, it's easy to forget about it and use `assert` instead.
* We need to see the error message in crashlogs of release builds. This is even not the case for `precondition`.
Also, re-export the "Basic" module in "SIL" so that the new assert implementation is also available in the Optimizer module (where all files import SIL).
It decides which functions need stack protection.
It sets the `needStackProtection` flags on all function which contain stack-allocated values for which an buffer overflow could occur.
Within safe swift code there shouldn't be any buffer overflows.
But if the address of a stack variable is converted to an unsafe pointer, it's not in the control of the compiler anymore.
This means, if there is any `address_to_pointer` instruction for an `alloc_stack`, such a function is marked for stack protection.
Another case is `index_addr` for non-tail allocated memory.
This pattern appears if pointer arithmetic is done with unsafe pointers in swift code.
If the origin of an unsafe pointer can only be tracked to a function argument, the pass tries to find the root stack allocation for such an argument by doing an inter-procedural analysis.
If this is not possible, the fallback is to move the argument into a temporary `alloc_stack` and do the unsafe pointer operations on the temporary.
rdar://93677524
It doesn't make sense to let getAccessPathWithScope return an `EnclosingScope` as the second tuple element, because in case it's a `base`, it duplicates the `AccessBase` (which is returned in the first tuple element).
Instead just return an optional `BeginAccessInst` which is not nil if such an "scope" is found.
