Change the syntax of availability queries from #available(iOS >= 8.0, OSX >= 10.10, *) to
This change reflects the fact that now that we spell the query '#available()' rather than
'#os()', the specification is about availability of the APIs introduced in a particular OS
release rather than an explicit range of OS versions on which the developer expects the
code to run.
There is a Fix-It to remove '>=' to ease adopting the new syntax.
Swift SVN r28025
results when finding bridged types, rather than reinventing
(well, pre-inventing) the same thing elsewhere.
Doing this apparently forces AbstractionPattern to deal
with ObjC protocol methods for the first time, which are
generic and therefore require even the Clang-based
abstraction patterns to propagate generic signatures.
Use this infrastructure to allow foreign error conventions
to suppress the wrapping of nonnull bridged collection results
in a level of optionality. We can't treat nil results as
an empty collection while simultaneously treating them as
an error signal.
Swift SVN r28022
@warn_unused_result can be attached to function declarations to
produce a warning if the function is called but its result is not
used. It has two optional parameters that can be placed in
parentheses:
message="some message": a message to include with the warning.
mutable_variant="somedecl": the name of the mutable variant of the
method that should be suggested when the subject method is called on
a mutable value.
The specific use we're implementing this for now is for the mutating
and in-place operations. For example:
@warn_unused_result(mutable_variant="sortInPlace") func sort() -> [Generator.Element] { ... }
mutating func sortInPlace() { ... }
Translate Clang's __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) into
@warn_unused_result.
Implements rdar://problem/18165189.
Swift SVN r28019
This can happen in witnesses, whose context archetypes are composed from the type-level archetypes of the witnessing type, and the method-level archetypes of the requirement. If you have something like:
protocol Foo {
func foo<T>(x: T)
}
struct Bar<T>: Foo {
func foo<U>(x: U)
}
Bar's witness to Foo.foo will end up with two archetypes named "T". Deal with this by having the SIL printer introduce a name mapping that disambiguates colliding archetypes. Refactor the SIL printer to do streaming through the SILPrinter itself, rather than directly on its ostream, so that we make sure it controls how subelements like types are printed, and it can pass the appropriate options down to the AST type printer. Fixes rdar://problem/20659406.
Swift SVN r27991
When deserializing a protocol, the conformance lookup table would not
contain entries for the inherited protocols of that protocol. They
were stashed in the "Protocols" array in TypeDecl (which will
eventually go away), but since there are no conformances for a
protocol, the conformance lookup table never got updated.
Nothing important seems to query this now; that will change soon.
Swift SVN r27967
includes a number of QoI things to help people write the correct code. I will commit
the testcase for it as the next patch.
The bulk of this patch is moving the stdlib, testsuite and validation testsuite to
the new syntax. I moved a few uses of "as" patterns back to as? expressions in the
stdlib as well.
Swift SVN r27959
pattern, and can be chained together in conditions just like our other 'if let'
constructs. This only adds functionality, it doesn't change anything yet.
Swift SVN r27932
Teach LoadStoreOpts to handle "let" variables properly. Such variables should be loaded only once and their loaded values can be reused. This is safe, because once assigned these variables cannot change their value.
Swift SVN r27915
I debated making isBodyThrowing() do this, but decided that
(1) the better recovery mode is to assume that the function
can throw but (2) making isBodyThrowing() return true on an
invalid function would be really weird.
Tested by the crash testsuite.
Swift SVN r27902
For the most part, this just involves spot fixes to make sure protocol inits follow the same paths as value type initializers would, with the extra wrinkle that we have to ensure we forward the correct metatype from the delegating initializer to the delegatee, in case the initializer is invoked with a different dynamic type from the static Self type. This should handle non-@objc delegations; @objc will need some additional work.
Swift SVN r27900
Preparation to fix <rdar://problem/18151694> Add Builtin.checkUnique
to avoid lost Array copies.
This adds the following new builtins:
isUnique : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
isUniqueOrPinned : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
These builtins take an inout object reference and return a
boolean. Passing the reference inout forces the optimizer to preserve
a retain distinct from what’s required to maintain lifetime for any of
the reference's source-level copies, because the called function is
allowed to replace the reference, thereby releasing the referent.
Before this change, the API entry points for uniqueness checking
already took an inout reference. However, after full inlining, it was
possible for two source-level variables that reference the same object
to appear to be the same variable from the optimizer's perspective
because an address to the variable was longer taken at the point of
checking uniqueness. Consequently the optimizer could remove
"redundant" copies which were actually needed to implement
copy-on-write semantics. With a builtin, the variable whose reference
is being checked for uniqueness appears mutable at the level of an
individual SIL instruction.
The kind of reference count checking that Builtin.isUnique performs
depends on the argument type:
- Native object types are directly checked by reading the
strong reference count:
(Builtin.NativeObject, known native class reference)
- Objective-C object types require an additional check that the
dynamic object type uses native swift reference counting:
(Builtin.UnknownObject, unknown class reference, class existential)
- Bridged object types allow the dymanic object type check to be
bypassed based on the pointer encoding:
(Builtin.BridgeObject)
Any of the above types may also be wrapped in an optional. If the
static argument type is optional, then a null check is also performed.
Thus, isUnique only returns true for non-null, native swift object
references with a strong reference count of one.
isUniqueOrPinned has the same semantics as isUnique except that it
also returns true if the object is marked pinned regardless of the
reference count. This allows for simultaneous non-structural
modification of multiple subobjects.
In some cases, the standard library can dynamically determine that it
has a native reference even though the static type is a bridge or
unknown object. Unsafe variants of the builtin are available to allow
the additional pointer bit mask and dynamic class lookup to be
bypassed in these cases:
isUnique_native : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
isUniqueOrPinned_native : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
These builtins perform an implicit cast to NativeObject before
checking uniqueness. There’s no way at SIL level to cast the address
of a reference, so we need to encapsulate this operation as part of
the builtin.
Swift SVN r27887
Printing a module as Objective-C turns out to be a fantastic way to
verify the (de-)serialization of foreign error conventions, so
collapse the parsing-driving Objective-C printing test of throwing
methods into the general test for methods.
Swift SVN r27880
Calls to willThrow are marked as read-none so that the optimizer can remove
them. The willThrow builtin is still generated for all throw/rethrow sites,
but I plan to look at this next.
rdar://20356658
Swift SVN r27877
The diagnostic we were producing was confusing the user into thinking that
you couldn't have a delegating init on a struct. Improve the diagnostic and
add a fixit hint.
Swift SVN r27872
Printing a module as Objective-C turns out to be a fantastic way to
verify the (de-)serialization of foreign error conventions, so
collapse the parsing-driving Objective-C printing test of throwing
methods into the general test for methods.
Swift SVN r27870
Printing Doxygen isn't inside an XML tag, so we can't just print
code block content, which may have new lines without a doc comment
marker. Also, be more robust with indentation.
+ Tests.
rdar://problem/20703026
Swift SVN r27851
a list of their elements, instead of abusing TupleExpr/ParenExpr
to hold them.
This is a more correct representation of what is going on in the
code and produces slightly better diagnostics in obscure cases.
However, the real reason to fix this is that the ParenExpr's that
were being formed were not being installed into the "semantic"
view of the collection expr, not getting type checked correctly,
and led to nonsensical ParenExprs. These non-sensical ParenExprs
blocked turning on AST verification of other ones.
With this fixed, we can finally add AST verification that
IdentityExpr's have sensible types.
Swift SVN r27850
Teach dominator based simplifications to also thread dominated edges.
The code now handles cond_br and switch_enum terminators for both value based
simplifications (where the use is dominated) and jump threading edges (the edge
is dominated).
Update simplify_cfg.sil test cases for split edges.
This also handles the test case from rdar://20390647.
Swift SVN r27843
Extensions cannot be uniquely cross-referenced, so cross-references to
extensions are serialized with the extended nominal type name and the
module in which the extension resides. This is not sufficient when
cross-referencing the generic type parameters of a constrained
protocol extension, because we don't know whether to get the
archetypes of the nominal type or some extension thereof. Serialize
the canonical generic signature so that we can pick an extension with
the same generic signature; it doesn't matter which we pick, so long
as we're consistent.
Fixes rdar://problem/20680169. Triggering this involves some
interesting interactions between the optimizer and standard library;
the standard library updates in the radar will test this.
Swift SVN r27825
We want to be able to synthesize new results inside SourceKit. At this
point, the simplest way to do that is to expose the constructors for
CodeCompletionResult and a create() function for CodeCompletionString.
The expectation that any strings are stored properly inside a
CodeCompletionResultSink is documented.
Swift SVN r27822
emit{StrongRelease,ReleaseValue} => emit{StrongRelease,ReleaseValue}AndFold.
Then introduce a new method emit{StrongRelease,ReleaseValue} that returns a
PointerUnion containing the increment to be deleted if it exists. This obviates
the need for the callback.
Swift SVN r27804
