Instead of immediately creating closures for local function declarations and treating them directly as capturable values, break function captures down and transitively capture the storage necessary to invoke the captured functions. Change the way SILGen emits calls to closures and local functions so that it treats the capture list as the first curry level of an invocation, so that full applications of closure literals or nested functions don't require a partial apply at all. This allows references among local functions with captures to work within the existing confines of partial_apply, and also has the nice benefit that circular references would work without creating reference cycles (though Sema unfortunately rejects them; something we arguably ought to fix.)
This fixes rdar://problem/11266246 and improves codegen of local functions. Full applications of functions, or immediate applications of closure literals like { }(), now never need to allocate a closure.
Swift SVN r28112
preserve the original method name.
This heuristic is based on the Objective-C selector and therefore
doesn't really handle factory methods that would conflict with
initializers, but we can hope that those simply don't come up in
the wild.
It's not clear that this is the best thing to do --- it tends to
promote the non-throwing API over what's probably a newer, throwing
API --- but it's significantly easier, and it unblocks code without
creating deployment problems.
Swift SVN r28066
results when finding bridged types, rather than reinventing
(well, pre-inventing) the same thing elsewhere.
Doing this apparently forces AbstractionPattern to deal
with ObjC protocol methods for the first time, which are
generic and therefore require even the Clang-based
abstraction patterns to propagate generic signatures.
Use this infrastructure to allow foreign error conventions
to suppress the wrapping of nonnull bridged collection results
in a level of optionality. We can't treat nil results as
an empty collection while simultaneously treating them as
an error signal.
Swift SVN r28022
This can happen in witnesses, whose context archetypes are composed from the type-level archetypes of the witnessing type, and the method-level archetypes of the requirement. If you have something like:
protocol Foo {
func foo<T>(x: T)
}
struct Bar<T>: Foo {
func foo<U>(x: U)
}
Bar's witness to Foo.foo will end up with two archetypes named "T". Deal with this by having the SIL printer introduce a name mapping that disambiguates colliding archetypes. Refactor the SIL printer to do streaming through the SILPrinter itself, rather than directly on its ostream, so that we make sure it controls how subelements like types are printed, and it can pass the appropriate options down to the AST type printer. Fixes rdar://problem/20659406.
Swift SVN r27991
Preparation to fix <rdar://problem/18151694> Add Builtin.checkUnique
to avoid lost Array copies.
This adds the following new builtins:
isUnique : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
isUniqueOrPinned : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
These builtins take an inout object reference and return a
boolean. Passing the reference inout forces the optimizer to preserve
a retain distinct from what’s required to maintain lifetime for any of
the reference's source-level copies, because the called function is
allowed to replace the reference, thereby releasing the referent.
Before this change, the API entry points for uniqueness checking
already took an inout reference. However, after full inlining, it was
possible for two source-level variables that reference the same object
to appear to be the same variable from the optimizer's perspective
because an address to the variable was longer taken at the point of
checking uniqueness. Consequently the optimizer could remove
"redundant" copies which were actually needed to implement
copy-on-write semantics. With a builtin, the variable whose reference
is being checked for uniqueness appears mutable at the level of an
individual SIL instruction.
The kind of reference count checking that Builtin.isUnique performs
depends on the argument type:
- Native object types are directly checked by reading the
strong reference count:
(Builtin.NativeObject, known native class reference)
- Objective-C object types require an additional check that the
dynamic object type uses native swift reference counting:
(Builtin.UnknownObject, unknown class reference, class existential)
- Bridged object types allow the dymanic object type check to be
bypassed based on the pointer encoding:
(Builtin.BridgeObject)
Any of the above types may also be wrapped in an optional. If the
static argument type is optional, then a null check is also performed.
Thus, isUnique only returns true for non-null, native swift object
references with a strong reference count of one.
isUniqueOrPinned has the same semantics as isUnique except that it
also returns true if the object is marked pinned regardless of the
reference count. This allows for simultaneous non-structural
modification of multiple subobjects.
In some cases, the standard library can dynamically determine that it
has a native reference even though the static type is a bridge or
unknown object. Unsafe variants of the builtin are available to allow
the additional pointer bit mask and dynamic class lookup to be
bypassed in these cases:
isUnique_native : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
isUniqueOrPinned_native : <T> (inout T[?]) -> Int1
These builtins perform an implicit cast to NativeObject before
checking uniqueness. There’s no way at SIL level to cast the address
of a reference, so we need to encapsulate this operation as part of
the builtin.
Swift SVN r27887
emit{StrongRelease,ReleaseValue} => emit{StrongRelease,ReleaseValue}AndFold.
Then introduce a new method emit{StrongRelease,ReleaseValue} that returns a
PointerUnion containing the increment to be deleted if it exists. This obviates
the need for the callback.
Swift SVN r27804
Replace the 'ignoreMissing' boolean flag with a new option set type,
SubstOptions, which is easier to extend. It is not an OptionSet<>
because a follow-on commit will introduce a non-trivial option that
will require more storage.
Also eliminate the LazyResolver parameter, which is no longer
needed. Eliminate the silly TypeChecker::substType(), whose only
purpose was to provide the resolver.
Swift SVN r27656
Keep track of a second set of "direct method reference" curry thunks that don't end in a dynamic dispatch in order to properly implement a partial application such as 'let foo = super.foo'. Fixes rdar://problem/20598526.
Swift SVN r27538
reference to something of class type. This is required to model
RebindSelfInConstructorExpr correctly to DI, since in the class case,
self.init and super.init *take* a value out of class box so that it
can pass the +1 value without performing an extra retain. Nothing
else in the compiler uninitializes a DI-controlled memory object
like this, so nothing else needs this. DI really doesn't like something
going from initialized to uninitialized.
Yes, I feel super-gross about this and am really unhappy about it. I
may end up reverting this if I can find an alternate solution to this
problem.
Swift SVN r27525
We still don't actually handle these correctly, but at least
we have sensible information for them now.
Also, remember that we're working with canonical generic
signatures in more places.
Swift SVN r27388
@objc protocols aren't supported with an ObjC runtime, but we still want values of AnyObject type to be word-sized. Handle this by turning the binary "needsWitnessTable" condition into a "dispatch strategy" enum, so we can recognize the condition "has no methods, so neither swift nor objc dispatch" as distinct from either swift or ObjC protocol representations. Assign this dispatch strategy when we lower AnyObject. Should be NFC for the ObjC-enabled build.
(It would also be beneficial for the ObjC-runtime-enabled version of Swift if AnyObject weren't an @objc protocol; that would mean we could give it a canonical protocol descriptor in the standard library, among other things. There are fairly deep assumptions in Sema that AnyObject is @objc, though, and it's not worth disturbing those assumptions right now.)
Reapplying with updates to the runtime unit tests.
Swift SVN r27341
@objc protocols aren't supported with an ObjC runtime, but we still want values of AnyObject type to be word-sized. Handle this by turning the binary "needsWitnessTable" condition into a "dispatch strategy" enum, so we can recognize the condition "has no methods, so neither swift nor objc dispatch" as distinct from either swift or ObjC protocol representations. Assign this dispatch strategy when we lower AnyObject. Should be NFC for the ObjC-enabled build.
(It would also be beneficial for the ObjC-runtime-enabled version of Swift if AnyObject weren't an @objc protocol; that would mean we could give it a canonical protocol descriptor in the standard library, among other things. There are fairly deep assumptions in Sema that AnyObject is @objc, though, and it's not worth disturbing those assumptions right now.)
Swift SVN r27338
When debugging a compiler, using -debug would crash the compiler on some witness_method instructions, because sometimes their conformances are empty (e.g. if the type being looked-up is an archetype or an existential).
Swift SVN r27325
DynamicCasts was not considering the fact that subclasses of a given class may implement a protocol, even if the class does not implement it.
Swift SVN r27265
The protocol_lookup the testcase from Interpreter test-cases exposed two bugs, once I tried to compiler with with -O:
- SILCloner was generating an open_existential_ref from an open_existential_metatype instruction during cloning even if the existential in question was not a class existential.
- DynamicCasts was not considering the fact that subclasses of a given class may implement a protocol, even if the class does not implement it.
Swift SVN r27260
The only caveat is that:
1. We do not properly recognize when we have a let binding and we
perform a guaranteed dynamic call. In such a case, we add an extra
retain, release pair around the call. In order to get that case I will
need to refactor some code in Callee. I want to make this change, but
not at the expense of getting the rest of this work in.
2. Some of the protocol witness thunks generated have unnecessary
retains or releases in a similar manner.
But this is a good first step.
I am going to send a large follow up email with all of the relevant results, so
I can let the bots chew on this a little bit.
rdar://19933044
Swift SVN r27241
The two ways functions are created currently is via the two
SILModule::getOrCreateFunction(). One of the methods, takes in a raw mangled
name and uses that to create the function. The other takes in a SILDeclRef to
generate the mangled name. Most function emission (besides some thunk creation
functions) goes through the latter. For now we update the map there. This is ok,
since this map will only be used to provide extra verification that guaranteed
self is occuring everywhere that it is supposed to (since constructors and
destructors still have @owned self).
Swift SVN r27240
Consistently open all references into existentials into
opened-existential archetypes within the constraint solver. Then,
during constraint application, use OpenExistentialExprs to record in
the AST where an existential is opened into an archetype, then use
that archetype throughout the subexpression. This simplifies the
overall representation, since we don't end up with a mix of operations
on existentials and operations on archetypes; it's all archetypes,
which tend to have better support down the line in SILGen already.
Start simplifying the code in SILGen by taking away the existential
paths that are no longer needed. I suspect there are more
simplifications to be had here.
The rules for placing OpenExistentialExprs are still a bit ad hoc;
this will get cleaned up later so that we can centralize that
information. Indeed, the one regression in the compiler-crasher suite
is because we're not closing out an open existential along an error
path.
Swift SVN r27230
Previous attempts to update the callgraph explicitly after calls to
linkFunction() weren't completely effective because we can deserialize
deeply and introduce multiple new function bodies in the process.
This gets us a bit closer, but only adds new call graph nodes. It does
not currently add edges for everything that gets deserialized (and this
is not fatal, so it is a step forward).
Swift SVN r27120
