I debated making isBodyThrowing() do this, but decided that
(1) the better recovery mode is to assume that the function
can throw but (2) making isBodyThrowing() return true on an
invalid function would be really weird.
Tested by the crash testsuite.
Swift SVN r27902
When semantic analysis forms a reference to a conformance that will
persist in the AST (it is "used" in the C++ odr-used sense), complete
that conformance before type checking terminates. This ensures that
the SIL optimizers have complete conformances to work with for, e.g.,
generic specialization. Fixes rdar://problem/20735544.
Swift SVN r27896
ConstraintSystem::dump to ConstraintSystem::print for
consistency with other parts of the compiler. Enhance
CS::print to print the ID # of a Type Variable, so you
don't have to count them to realize that you're looking
at typevar #13
Swift SVN r27874
The diagnostic we were producing was confusing the user into thinking that
you couldn't have a delegating init on a struct. Improve the diagnostic and
add a fixit hint.
Swift SVN r27872
We might be looking at a protocol requirement, which conforms to a
protocol but has a null conformance. Also, don't bother looking at
completeness: it doesn't matter. Fixes rdar://problem/20608438.
Swift SVN r27860
fixing:
<rdar://problem/18400194> Parenthesized function expression crashes the compiler
it still grosses me out that we're using diagnostics machinery for correctness of
type checking default arguments :-(
Swift SVN r27855
This fixes <rdar://problem/20494437> SILGen crash handling default arguments
again, and includes a fix for MiscDiagnostics to look through the generated
TupleShuffleExprs in @noescape processing (which tripped up XCTest).
This fixes <rdar://problem/16860940> QoI: Strict keyword arguments loses type sugar in calls
where we'd lose some type sugar.
This fixes sanity in the ASTs: ScalarToTupleExpr now always has consistent
types between its argument and result, so we can turn on AST Verification of it.
Swift SVN r27827
Extensions cannot be uniquely cross-referenced, so cross-references to
extensions are serialized with the extended nominal type name and the
module in which the extension resides. This is not sufficient when
cross-referencing the generic type parameters of a constrained
protocol extension, because we don't know whether to get the
archetypes of the nominal type or some extension thereof. Serialize
the canonical generic signature so that we can pick an extension with
the same generic signature; it doesn't matter which we pick, so long
as we're consistent.
Fixes rdar://problem/20680169. Triggering this involves some
interesting interactions between the optimizer and standard library;
the standard library updates in the radar will test this.
Swift SVN r27825
This was an ugly situation where we'd create an invalid ScalarToTuple in
a situation with default arguments, because CSApply didn't realize that the
default argument causes formation of a specific tuple kind with a single element.
There is more damage in this area, other work coming.
Swift SVN r27811
We now produce tailored diagnostics for assignment operators that are passed a non-mutable LHS,
e.g.:
t.swift:14:3: error: cannot pass 'let' value 'x' to mutating binary operator '/='
x /= 19
~ ^
t.swift:13:1: note: change 'let' to 'var' to make it mutable
let x = 42
^~~
var
Swift SVN r27780
- <rdar://problem/16306600> QoI: passing a 'let' value as an inout results in an unfriendly diagnostic
- <rdar://problem/16927246> provide a fixit to change "let" to "var" if needing to mutate a variable
We now refer to an inout argument as such, e.g.:
t.swift:7:9: error: cannot pass 'let' value 'a' as inout argument
swap(&a, &b)
^
we also produce a note with a fixit to rewrite let->var in trivial cases where mutation is
being assed for, e.g.:
t.swift:3:3: note: change 'let' to 'var' to make it mutable
let a = 42
^~~
var
The note is produced by both Sema and DI.
Swift SVN r27774
We now produce diagnostics like:
- cannot pass 'let' value 'a' to mutating unary operator '++'
- cannot pass get-only property 'b' to mutating unary operator '++'
- cannot pass immutable value of type 'Int64' to mutating unary operator '++'
Swift SVN r27772
Now we bind the defer body into a ClosureExpr and emit it at the point of
the defer. At any exit points out of the controlled region, we emit a call
to the closure.
This should cover any problems where expressions cannot be emitted multiple times.
However, this is dramatically more complex than the obvious implementation, so I
hope this patch can be reverted.
Swift SVN r27767
(somewhat ironically, given that we added it for throw) because we model
throw as an Expr currently which makes it more difficult in Sema. SILGen
catches this situation and any others that I didn't remember to handle here.
Swift SVN r27762
On that testcase, we now generate:
t.swift:8:22: error: integer literal '123456' overflows when stored into 'UInt8'
case tooFarByFar = 123456
^
t.swift:7:8: error: integer literal '256' overflows when stored into 'UInt8'
case twoHundredFiftySix
^
instead of spitting out some warnings with no source loc (which Xcode eats).
This patch:
- Propagates source locations for literals when synthesizing code in various places,
so we get the right diagnostic at the right spot.
- Improves the constant folding SIL Pass to print the value overflowing, which is
necessary for cases with an implicit value (like 256 above), and is general goodness
for the QoI of the diagnostic anyway.
Swift SVN r27756
We warn like this:
t.swift:3:12: warning: 'let' pattern has no effect; sub-pattern didn't bind any variables
case let .Bar: println("bar")
^~~ ~~~~
Swift SVN r27747
In addition to being better for performance in these cases, this disables the "self."
requirement in these blocks. {}() constructs are often used to work around statements
that are not exprs in Swift, so they are reasonably important.
Fixing this takes a couple of pieces working together:
- Add a new 'extraFunctionAttrs' map to the ConstraintSystem for solution
invariant function attributes that are inferred (like @noescape).
- Teach constraint simplification of function applications to propagate
@noescape between unified function types.
- Teach CSGen of ApplyExprs to mark the callee functiontype as noescape
when it is obviously a ClosureExpr.
This is a very limited fix in some ways: you could argue that ApplyExpr should
*always* mark its callee as noescape. However, doing so would just introduce a
ton of function conversions to remove it again, so we don't do that.
Swift SVN r27723
DI makes the assumption that the type of self in an initializer is always
derived from a nominal type. Now that you can put an initializer body on a
protocol, this isn't true anymore, so teach it about this.
Swift SVN r27714
To be safe, protocol witnesses need to be as available as their requirements.
Otherwise, the programmer could access an unavailable declaration by upcasting
to the protocol type and accessing the declaration via its requirement.
Prior to this commit, we enforced safety by requiring that the annotated
available range of a requirement must be completely contained within the
annotated available range of the witness.
However, there are cases where this requirement is too restrictive. Suppose
there is some super class Super with an availability-restricted method f():
class Super {
@availability(iOS, introduced=6.0)
void func f() { ... }
}
Further, suppose there is a protocol HasF with unrestricted availability:
protocol HasF {
void func f()
}
and then a limited-availability class Sub extends Super and declares a
conformance to HasF:
@availability(iOS, introduced=8.0)
class Sub: Super, HasF {
}
Sub does conform to HasF: the witness for HasF's f() requirement is Super's f().
But Super's f() is less available (iOS 6 and up) than HasF's f() requires
(all versions) and so--prior to this commit--the compiler would emit
an error.
This error is too conservative. The conforming type, Sub,
is only available on iOS 8.0 and later. And, given an environment of iOS 8.0
and later, the availability of the requirement and the witness is the same, so
the conformance is safe.
This false alarm arises in UIKit, where Super is UIView, HasF
is UIGestureRecognizerDelegate, and f() is gestureRecognizerShouldBegin().
The fix is to change the safety requirement for protocol witnesses:
we now require that the intersection of the availabilities of the conforming
type and the protocol requirement is fully contained in the intersection of the
availabilities of the conforming type and the witness. It does not matter if
the containment does not hold for versions on which the conforming type is not
available.
rdar://problem/20693144
Swift SVN r27712
This was causing the SourceKit regression, because we were ending up
with two synthesized declarations. Revert r27673, which we no longer need.
Swift SVN r27678
With prior changes to make conformance checking more lazy, this gets r27617 working.
More auditing and testing of this visitor to follow.
Swift SVN r27658
Replace the 'ignoreMissing' boolean flag with a new option set type,
SubstOptions, which is easier to extend. It is not an OptionSet<>
because a follow-on commit will introduce a non-trivial option that
will require more storage.
Also eliminate the LazyResolver parameter, which is no longer
needed. Eliminate the silly TypeChecker::substType(), whose only
purpose was to provide the resolver.
Swift SVN r27656
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
This eliminates nonsensical recursion when working with protocol
conformances, and makes their checking more lazy. Start to improve
name lookup to deal with protocol witnesses more lazily, generalizing
the solution we had to all protocol conformances and making it more
directed. We're not done here, as the FIXMEs in the code completion
test imply: this replace-the-requirement-with-the-witness behavior
needs to be sunk down into the AST level so it also applies to
unqualified lookup, visible-decl lookup, etc.
Swift SVN r27639
