Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Lattner
31c01eab73 Change the meaning of "if let x = foo()" back to Xcode 6.4 semantics. The compiler
includes a number of QoI things to help people write the correct code.  I will commit
the testcase for it as the next patch.

The bulk of this patch is moving the stdlib, testsuite and validation testsuite to
the new syntax.  I moved a few uses of "as" patterns back to as? expressions in the 
stdlib as well.



Swift SVN r27959
2015-04-30 04:38:13 +00:00
Chris Lattner
20f8f09ea8 Land: <rdar://problem/19382905> improve 'if let' to support refutable patterns and untie it from optionals
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.

Where before you might have written:
  if let x = foo() {

you now need to write:
  if let x? = foo() {
    
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.

To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?.  It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.

For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error.  This means that you'll get:

t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
       ^
        ?

I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time.  I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.

In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).




Swift SVN r26150
2015-03-15 07:06:22 +00:00
Chris Lattner
3357ee21f3 Revert r25417, r25408, and r25370. This adds back back the warning for
un-type-annotated AnyObject binding in "if let", and allows general 
patterns in if-let.

This also reverts some unrelated QoI improvements that went in with those
patches, but I'll add those back next.


Swift SVN r25507
2015-02-24 18:55:54 +00:00
Chris Lattner
079173ce5b Dial back the warning about "type inferred to AnyObject may be unexpected" in an if/let
conditional context.  There is no point diagnosing it here (just like a foreach loop) because
the if/let is just unwrapping the optional in the initializer expression.

Removing this requirement eliminates a bunch of extraneous type annotations in the testsuite.



Swift SVN r25370
2015-02-18 06:13:11 +00:00
Jordan Rose
e83c117c30 [test] Hack: run stdlib tests first to start long-running tests earlier.
This decreases total testing time by over a minute on my old Mac Pro.
It probably has much less effect on systems with fewer cores, but shouldn't
be any worse there.

Swift SVN r22745
2014-10-15 01:30:51 +00:00