If a generic parameter is not referred to from a function signature, it can never be inferred and thus such a function can never be invoked.
We now produce the following error:
generic parameter 'T' is not used in function signature
func f8<T> (x: Int) {}
This commit takes Jordan't comments on r28181 into account:
- it produces a shorter error message
- it does not change the compiler_crashers_fixed test and add a new expected error instead
Swift SVN r28194
If a generic parameter is not referred to from a function signature, it can never be inferred and thus such a function can never be invoked.
We now produce the following error:
There is no way to infer the generic parameter 'T' if it is not used in function signature
func f8<T> (x: Int) {}
^
Swift SVN r28181
This fixes <rdar://problem/20494437> SILGen crash handling default arguments
again, and includes a fix for MiscDiagnostics to look through the generated
TupleShuffleExprs in @noescape processing (which tripped up XCTest).
This fixes <rdar://problem/16860940> QoI: Strict keyword arguments loses type sugar in calls
where we'd lose some type sugar.
This fixes sanity in the ASTs: ScalarToTupleExpr now always has consistent
types between its argument and result, so we can turn on AST Verification of it.
Swift SVN r27827
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
Inference of type witnesses for associated types was previously
implemented as part of value witness matching in the constraint
solver. This led to a number of serious problems, including:
- Recursion problems with the solver hunting for a type witness,
which triggers more attemts to match value witnesses...
- Arbitrarily crummy attempts to break the recursion causing
type-check failures in fun places.
- Ordering dependencies abound: different results depending on which
value witnesses were satisfied first, failures because of the order
in which we attempted to infer type witnesses, etc.
This new implementation of type witness inference uses a separate pass
that occurs whenever we're looking for any type witness, and solves
all of the type witnesses within a given conformance
simultaneously. We still look at potential value witnesses to infer
type witnesses, but we match them structurally, without invoking the
constraint solver.
There are a few caveats to this implementation:
* We're not currently able to infer type witnesses from value
witnesses that are global operators, so some tricks involving global
operators (*cough* ~> *cough*) might require some manually-specified
type witnesses. Note that the standard library doesn't include any
such cases.
* Yes, it's another kind of solver. At simple one, fortunately.
On the other hand, this implementation should be a big step forward:
* It's far more predictable, order-invariant, and non-recursive.
* The diagnostics for failures to infer type witnesses have
improved.
Fixes rdar://problem/20598513.
Swift SVN r27616
The type checker (and various other parts of the front end) jump
through many hoops to try to cope with the lack of a proper
declaration for an inferred type witness, causing various annoying
bugs. Additionally, we were creating implicit declarations for
derived/synthesized witnesses, leading to inconsistent AST
representations. This ch
Note that we'll now end up printing the inferred type aliases for type
witnesses, which represents a reversal of the decision that closed
rdar://problem/15168378. This result is more consistent.
Now with a simpler accessibility computation.
Swift SVN r27512
The type checker (and various other parts of the front end) jump
through many hoops to try to cope with the lack of a proper
declaration for an inferred type witness, causing various annoying
bugs. Additionally, we were creating implicit declarations for
derived/synthesized witnesses, leading to inconsistent AST
representations. This ch
Note that we'll now end up printing the inferred type aliases for type
witnesses, which represents a reversal of the decision that closed
rdar://problem/15168378. This result is more consistent.
Swift SVN r27487
Retire the old components now that the new ones have passed API review.
<rdar://20406937> covers the migration fallout of this change.
Swift SVN r27092
Retire the old components now that the new ones have passed API review.
<rdar://20406937> covers the migration fallout of this change.
Swift SVN r27081
Retire the old components now that the new ones have passed API review.
<rdar://20406937> covers the migration fallout of this change.
Swift SVN r26904
(Note that this registry isn't fully enabled yet; it's built so that
we can test it, but has not yet taken over the primary task of
managing conformances from the existing system).
The conformance registry tracks all of the protocols to which a
particular nominal type conforms, including those for which
conformance was explicitly specified, implied by other explicit
conformances, inherited from a superclass, or synthesized by the
implementation.
The conformance registry is a lazily-built data structure designed for
multi-file support (which has been a problematic area for protocol
conformances). It allows one to query for the conformances of a type
to a particular protocol, enumerate all protocols to which a type
conforms, and enumerate all of the conformances that are associated
with a particular declaration context (important to eliminate
duplicated witness tables).
The conformance registry diagnoses conflicts and ambiguities among
different conformances of the same type to the same protocol. There
are three common cases where we'll see a diagnostic:
1) Redundant explicit conformance of a type to a protocol:
protocol P { }
struct X : P { }
extension X : P { } // error: redundant explicit conformance
2) Explicit conformance to a protocol that collides with an inherited
conformance:
protocol P { }
class Super : P { }
class Sub : Super, P { } // error: redundant explicit conformance
3) Ambiguous placement of an implied conformance:
protocol P1 { }
protocol P2 : P1 { }
protocol P3 : P1 { }
struct Y { }
extension Y : P2 { }
extension Y : P3 { } // error: ambiguous implied conformance to 'P1'
This happens when two different explicit conformances (here, P2 and
P3) placed on different declarations (e.g., two extensions, or the
original definition and other extension) both imply the same
conformance (P1), and neither of the explicit conformances imply
each other. We require the user to explicitly specify the ambiguous
conformance to break the ambiguity and associate the witness table
with a specific context.
Swift SVN r26067
For @objc enums, raw values determine the representation values, so we have
to compute them eagerly in order for switch statements to work. Similarly,
if the enum is broken, we have to /fail/ eagerly so that we don't fall down
later on in IRGen.
rdar://problem/19775284
Swift SVN r25282
- Situations where the type of a return statement's result expression doesn't line up with the function's type annotation.
- Situations where the type of an initializer expression doesn't line up with its declaration's type pattern.
- Situations where we assume a conversion to a built-in protocol must take place, such as in if-statement conditionals.
(Addresses rdar://problem/19224776, rdar://problem/19422107, rdar://problem/19422156, rdar://problem/19547806 and lots of other dupes.)
Swift SVN r24853
Allows same-type constraints that map down to tuple types. This is a
minimal fix that allows the code in rdar://problem/18120419 to
type-check. However, the actual code in that radar triggers a SILGen
assertion (Archetype to be substituted must be valid in function), and
we're not recursively matching concrete types the way we should be, so
this is a baby step.
Among other things, this allows one to provide a same-type con
Swift SVN r24535
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
When dealing with multiple levels of generic parameters, the mapping
from potential archetypes down to actual archetypes did not have
access to the archetypes for outer generic parameters. When same-type
requirements equated a type from the inner generic parameter list with
one from the outer generic parameter list, the reference to the outer
generic parameter list's type would remain dependent. For example,
given:
struct S<A: P> {
init<Q: P where Q.T == A>(_ q: Q) {}
}
we would end up with the dependent type for A (τ_0_0) in the same-type
constraint in the initializer requirement.
Now, notify the ArchetypeBuilder of outer generic signatures (and,
therefore, outer generic parameters), so that it has knowledge of the
mapping from those generic parameters to the corresponding
archetypes. Use that mapping when translating potential archetypes to
real archetypes. Additionally, when a potential archetype is mapped to
a concrete type (via a same-type constraint to a concrete type),
substitute archetypes for any dependent types within the concrete
type.
Remove a bunch of hacks in the compiler that identified dependent
types in "strange" places and tried to map them back to
archetypes. Those hacks handled some narrow cases we saw in the
standard library and some external code, but papered over the
underlying issue and left major gaps.
Sadly, introduce one hack into the type checker to help with the
matching of generic witnesses to generic requirements that follow the
pattern described above. See ConstraintSystem::SelfTypeVar; the proper
implementation for this matching involves substituting the adoptee
type in for Self within the requirement, and synthesizing new
archetypes from the result.
Fixes rdar://18435371, rdar://18803556, rdar://19082500,
rdar://19245317, rdar://19371678 and a half dozen compiler crashers
from the crash suite. There are a few other radars that I suspect this
fixes, but which require more steps to reproduce.
Swift SVN r24460
This reverts commit r23030.
This puts non-primary archetypes back in the all-archetypes list,
which is the deepest underlying problem behind
rdar://problem/19049566.
Conflicts:
lib/AST/ArchetypeBuilder.cpp
validation-test/compiler_crashers/0033-error.swift
validation-test/compiler_crashers/035-multiple-typecheck-segfault.swift
Swift SVN r24333
rdar://problem/17198298
- Allow 'static' in protocol property and func requirements, but not 'class'.
- Allow 'static' methods in classes - they are 'class final'.
- Only allow 'class' methods in classes (or extensions of classes)
- Remove now unneeded diagnostics related to finding 'static' in previously banned places.
- Update relevant diagnostics to make the new rules clear.
Swift SVN r24260
Previously the "as" keyword could either represent coercion or or forced
downcasting. This change separates the two notions. "as" now only means
type conversion, while the new "as!" operator is used to perform forced
downcasting. If a program uses "as" where "as!" is called for, we emit a
diagnostic and fixit.
Internally, this change removes the UnresolvedCheckedCastExpr class, in
favor of directly instantiating CoerceExpr when parsing the "as"
operator, and ForcedCheckedCastExpr when parsing the "as!" operator.
Swift SVN r24253
as passing self by value, not by inout. This is the correct representation at
the AST level, and we now lower self references as the new @in_guaranteed
parameter convention. This allows SIL clients (like DI) to know that a nonmutating
protocol method does not mutate the pointee passed into the method.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/19215313> let properties don't work with protocol method dispatch
<rdar://problem/15821762> Self argument of generic curried nonmutating instance methods is inout
Swift SVN r23864
These changes make the following improvements to how we generate diagnostics for expression typecheck failure:
- Customizing a diagnostic for a specific expression kind is as easy as adding a new method to the FailureDiagnosis class,
and does not require intimate knowledge of the constraint solver’s inner workings.
- As part of this patch, I’ve introduced specialized diagnostics for call, binop, unop, subscript, assignment and inout
expressions, but we can go pretty far with this.
- This also opens up the possibility to customize diagnostics not just for the expression kind, but for the specific types
involved as well.
- For the purpose of presenting accurate type info, partially-specialized subexpressions are individually re-typechecked
free of any contextual types. This allows us to:
- Properly surface subexpression errors.
- Almost completely avoid any type variables in our diagnostics. In cases where they could not be eliminated, we now
substitute in "_".
- More accurately indicate the sources of errors.
- We do a much better job of diagnosing disjunction failures. (So no more nonsensical ‘UInt8’ error messages.)
- We now present reasonable error messages for overload resolution failures, informing the user of partially-matching
parameter lists when possible.
At the very least, these changes address the following bugs:
<rdar://problem/15863738> More information needed in type-checking error messages
<rdar://problem/16306600> QoI: passing a 'let' value as an inout results in an unfriendly diagnostic
<rdar://problem/16449805> Wrong error for struct-to-protocol downcast
<rdar://problem/16699932> improve type checker diagnostic when passing Double to function taking a Float
<rdar://problem/16707914> fatal error: Can't unwrap Optional.None…Optional.swift, line 75 running Master-Detail Swift app built from template
<rdar://problem/16785829> Inout parameter fixit
<rdar://problem/16900438> We shouldn't leak the internal type placeholder
<rdar://problem/16909379> confusing type check diagnostics
<rdar://problem/16951521> Extra arguments to functions result in an unhelpful error
<rdar://problem/16971025> Two Terrible Diagnostics
<rdar://problem/17007804> $T2 in compiler error string
<rdar://problem/17027483> Terrible diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17083239> Mysterious error using find() with Foundation types
<rdar://problem/17149771> Diagnostic for closure with no inferred return value leaks type variables
<rdar://problem/17212371> Swift poorly-worded error message when overload resolution fails on return type
<rdar://problem/17236976> QoI: Swift error for incorrectly typed parameter is confusing/misleading
<rdar://problem/17304200> Wrong error for non-self-conforming protocols
<rdar://problem/17321369> better error message for inout protocols
<rdar://problem/17539380> Swift error seems wrong
<rdar://problem/17559593> Bogus locationless "treating a forced downcast to 'NSData' as optional will never produce 'nil'" warning
<rdar://problem/17567973> 32-bit error message is really far from the mark: error: missing argument for parameter 'withFont' in call
<rdar://problem/17671058> Wrong error message: "Missing argument for parameter 'completion' in call"
<rdar://problem/17704609> Float is not convertible to UInt8
<rdar://problem/17705424> Poor error reporting for passing Doubles to NSColor: extra argument 'red' in call
<rdar://problem/17743603> Swift compiler gives misleading error message in "NSLayoutConstraint.constraintsWithVisualFormat("x", options: 123, metrics: nil, views: views)"
<rdar://problem/17784167> application of operator to generic type results in odd diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17801696> Awful diagnostic trying to construct an Int when .Int is around
<rdar://problem/17863882> cannot convert the expression's type '()' to type 'Seq'
<rdar://problem/17865869> "has different argument names" diagnostic when parameter defaulted-ness differs
<rdar://problem/17937593> Unclear error message for empty array literal without type context
<rdar://problem/17943023> QoI: compiler displays wrong error when a float is provided to a Int16 parameter in init method
<rdar://problem/17951148> Improve error messages for expressions inside if statements by pre-evaluating outside the 'if'
<rdar://problem/18057815> Unhelpful Swift error message
<rdar://problem/18077468> Incorrect argument label for insertSubview(...)
<rdar://problem/18079213> 'T1' is not identical to 'T2' lacks directionality
<rdar://problem/18086470> Confusing Swift error message: error: 'T' is not convertible to 'MirrorDisposition'
<rdar://problem/18098995> QoI: Unhelpful compiler error when leaving off an & on an inout parameter
<rdar://problem/18104379> Terrible error message
<rdar://problem/18121897> unexpected low-level error on assignment to immutable value through array writeback
<rdar://problem/18123596> unexpected error on self. capture inside class method
<rdar://problem/18152074> QoI: Improve diagnostic for type mismatch in dictionary subscripting
<rdar://problem/18242160> There could be a better error message when using [] instead of [:]
<rdar://problem/18242812> 6A1021a : Type variable leaked
<rdar://problem/18331819> Unclear error message when trying to set an element of an array constant (Swift)
<rdar://problem/18414834> Bad diagnostics example
<rdar://problem/18422468> Calculation of constant value yields unexplainable error
<rdar://problem/18427217> Misleading error message makes debugging difficult
<rdar://problem/18439742> Misleading error: "cannot invoke" mentions completely unrelated types as arguments
<rdar://problem/18535804> Wrong compiler error from swift compiler
<rdar://problem/18567914> Xcode 6.1. GM, Swift, assignment from Int64 to NSNumber. Warning shown as problem with UInt8
<rdar://problem/18784027> Negating Int? Yields Float
<rdar://problem/17691565> attempt to modify a 'let' variable with ++ results in typecheck error about @lvalue Float
<rdar://problem/17164001> "++" on let value could give a better error message
Swift SVN r23782
The archetype builder is responsible for figuring out what should go
into a generic signature anyway, so move the generic signature
creation there. This will also allow us to eliminate some code
duplication across Sema and AST.
Fixes compiler crasher 033.
Swift SVN r23030
This will turn into "exactly" in a future commit, when we can build a
generic signature from an archetype builder (directly) and compare the
results.
Swift SVN r23010
Extend the contract for enumerateRequirements() a bit to preserve
archetype-to-archetype same-type constraints. Use that extra
information in the debug dump. NFC elsewhere.
Swift SVN r23008
This pushes some of the extra same-type requirements introduced in r22649 into the generic signature. Doesn’t really have an effect outside of extending generic signatures slightly.
Swift SVN r22680
When we have two protocol conformance requirements for the same type
T, and each of those protocols has an associated type with a given
(shared) name N, infer a same-type requirement between the two. Only
really enabled for testing now; it doesn't feed into general type
checking yet.
Swift SVN r22649
