Emitting an error message about a pattern the user didn't write isn't awesome,
complain about the type requirements of an if/let binding specifically.
Swift SVN r28119
includes a number of QoI things to help people write the correct code. I will commit
the testcase for it as the next patch.
The bulk of this patch is moving the stdlib, testsuite and validation testsuite to
the new syntax. I moved a few uses of "as" patterns back to as? expressions in the
stdlib as well.
Swift SVN r27959
- Add frontend and standard library build support for tvOS.
- Add frontend support for watchOS.
watchOS standard library builds are still disabled during SDK bring-up.
To build for TVOS, specify --tvos to build-script.
To build for watchOS, specify --watchos to build-script (not yet supported).
This patch does not include turning on full tests for TVOS or watchOS, and
will be included in a follow-up patch.
Swift SVN r26278
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
So, it turns out that if the type checker were to re-write the Expr node of a single-expression closure body, we were never writing the modified body Expr back into the closure Expr.
This meant that if the closure expression's body were something like 'self.foo', we'd leave an UnresolvedDotExpr in the AST and most likely end up crashing down the line.
This has been responsible for about 4700 crash reports over the past several months. (Though, oddly enough, we didn't seem to hit it in the crash suite.) Thanks to Argyrios for pushing on this one!
rdar://problem/19840785
Swift SVN r25774
- Situations where the type of a return statement's result expression doesn't line up with the function's type annotation.
- Situations where the type of an initializer expression doesn't line up with its declaration's type pattern.
- Situations where we assume a conversion to a built-in protocol must take place, such as in if-statement conditionals.
(Addresses rdar://problem/19224776, rdar://problem/19422107, rdar://problem/19422156, rdar://problem/19547806 and lots of other dupes.)
Swift SVN r24853
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Previously the "as" keyword could either represent coercion or or forced
downcasting. This change separates the two notions. "as" now only means
type conversion, while the new "as!" operator is used to perform forced
downcasting. If a program uses "as" where "as!" is called for, we emit a
diagnostic and fixit.
Internally, this change removes the UnresolvedCheckedCastExpr class, in
favor of directly instantiating CoerceExpr when parsing the "as"
operator, and ForcedCheckedCastExpr when parsing the "as!" operator.
Swift SVN r24253
These changes make the following improvements to how we generate diagnostics for expression typecheck failure:
- Customizing a diagnostic for a specific expression kind is as easy as adding a new method to the FailureDiagnosis class,
and does not require intimate knowledge of the constraint solver’s inner workings.
- As part of this patch, I’ve introduced specialized diagnostics for call, binop, unop, subscript, assignment and inout
expressions, but we can go pretty far with this.
- This also opens up the possibility to customize diagnostics not just for the expression kind, but for the specific types
involved as well.
- For the purpose of presenting accurate type info, partially-specialized subexpressions are individually re-typechecked
free of any contextual types. This allows us to:
- Properly surface subexpression errors.
- Almost completely avoid any type variables in our diagnostics. In cases where they could not be eliminated, we now
substitute in "_".
- More accurately indicate the sources of errors.
- We do a much better job of diagnosing disjunction failures. (So no more nonsensical ‘UInt8’ error messages.)
- We now present reasonable error messages for overload resolution failures, informing the user of partially-matching
parameter lists when possible.
At the very least, these changes address the following bugs:
<rdar://problem/15863738> More information needed in type-checking error messages
<rdar://problem/16306600> QoI: passing a 'let' value as an inout results in an unfriendly diagnostic
<rdar://problem/16449805> Wrong error for struct-to-protocol downcast
<rdar://problem/16699932> improve type checker diagnostic when passing Double to function taking a Float
<rdar://problem/16707914> fatal error: Can't unwrap Optional.None…Optional.swift, line 75 running Master-Detail Swift app built from template
<rdar://problem/16785829> Inout parameter fixit
<rdar://problem/16900438> We shouldn't leak the internal type placeholder
<rdar://problem/16909379> confusing type check diagnostics
<rdar://problem/16951521> Extra arguments to functions result in an unhelpful error
<rdar://problem/16971025> Two Terrible Diagnostics
<rdar://problem/17007804> $T2 in compiler error string
<rdar://problem/17027483> Terrible diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17083239> Mysterious error using find() with Foundation types
<rdar://problem/17149771> Diagnostic for closure with no inferred return value leaks type variables
<rdar://problem/17212371> Swift poorly-worded error message when overload resolution fails on return type
<rdar://problem/17236976> QoI: Swift error for incorrectly typed parameter is confusing/misleading
<rdar://problem/17304200> Wrong error for non-self-conforming protocols
<rdar://problem/17321369> better error message for inout protocols
<rdar://problem/17539380> Swift error seems wrong
<rdar://problem/17559593> Bogus locationless "treating a forced downcast to 'NSData' as optional will never produce 'nil'" warning
<rdar://problem/17567973> 32-bit error message is really far from the mark: error: missing argument for parameter 'withFont' in call
<rdar://problem/17671058> Wrong error message: "Missing argument for parameter 'completion' in call"
<rdar://problem/17704609> Float is not convertible to UInt8
<rdar://problem/17705424> Poor error reporting for passing Doubles to NSColor: extra argument 'red' in call
<rdar://problem/17743603> Swift compiler gives misleading error message in "NSLayoutConstraint.constraintsWithVisualFormat("x", options: 123, metrics: nil, views: views)"
<rdar://problem/17784167> application of operator to generic type results in odd diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17801696> Awful diagnostic trying to construct an Int when .Int is around
<rdar://problem/17863882> cannot convert the expression's type '()' to type 'Seq'
<rdar://problem/17865869> "has different argument names" diagnostic when parameter defaulted-ness differs
<rdar://problem/17937593> Unclear error message for empty array literal without type context
<rdar://problem/17943023> QoI: compiler displays wrong error when a float is provided to a Int16 parameter in init method
<rdar://problem/17951148> Improve error messages for expressions inside if statements by pre-evaluating outside the 'if'
<rdar://problem/18057815> Unhelpful Swift error message
<rdar://problem/18077468> Incorrect argument label for insertSubview(...)
<rdar://problem/18079213> 'T1' is not identical to 'T2' lacks directionality
<rdar://problem/18086470> Confusing Swift error message: error: 'T' is not convertible to 'MirrorDisposition'
<rdar://problem/18098995> QoI: Unhelpful compiler error when leaving off an & on an inout parameter
<rdar://problem/18104379> Terrible error message
<rdar://problem/18121897> unexpected low-level error on assignment to immutable value through array writeback
<rdar://problem/18123596> unexpected error on self. capture inside class method
<rdar://problem/18152074> QoI: Improve diagnostic for type mismatch in dictionary subscripting
<rdar://problem/18242160> There could be a better error message when using [] instead of [:]
<rdar://problem/18242812> 6A1021a : Type variable leaked
<rdar://problem/18331819> Unclear error message when trying to set an element of an array constant (Swift)
<rdar://problem/18414834> Bad diagnostics example
<rdar://problem/18422468> Calculation of constant value yields unexplainable error
<rdar://problem/18427217> Misleading error message makes debugging difficult
<rdar://problem/18439742> Misleading error: "cannot invoke" mentions completely unrelated types as arguments
<rdar://problem/18535804> Wrong compiler error from swift compiler
<rdar://problem/18567914> Xcode 6.1. GM, Swift, assignment from Int64 to NSNumber. Warning shown as problem with UInt8
<rdar://problem/18784027> Negating Int? Yields Float
<rdar://problem/17691565> attempt to modify a 'let' variable with ++ results in typecheck error about @lvalue Float
<rdar://problem/17164001> "++" on let value could give a better error message
Swift SVN r23782
This prevented metatype casts and other kinds of cast that could be allowed from being accepted. Keep the subtype constraint if we're casting between generic class types with open type variables, because it can provide context to deduce type arguments in this case. This causes a regression in test/Constraints/members.swift that uses 'as' as a coercion, but we're planning to disambiguate cast/coercion syntax soon, which should fix that issue.
Swift SVN r23303
Previously we hardcoded a few important default CPUs, ABIs, and features into
Swift's driver, duplicating work in Clang. Now that we're using Clang's
driver to create the Clang "sub-compiler", we can delegate this work to Clang.
As part of this, I've dropped the options for -target-abi (which was a
frontend-only option anyway) and -target-feature (which was a hidden driver
option and is a frontend-only option in /Clang/). We can revisit this later
if it becomes interesting. I left in -target-cpu, which is now mapped
directly to Clang's -mcpu=.
Swift SVN r22449
Trying a collection literal early often means that we can determine
the element type from context, which saves us the work of trying to
guess at the element type firsthand.
Doing this seems to help some cases significantly:
- test/stdlib/ArrayNew.swift got about 20% faster in a release build
- I had to drop the threshold for the "expression too complex" test
case by 20x to still trigger the issue.
Swift SVN r22097
for testing purposes.
When enabled, if the typechecker tries to typecheck a decl or unresolved identifier with the provided
prefix, then an llvm fatal_error will get triggered.
This approach has the advantage that it is very easy to write tests for unnecessary typechecking for a wide range of functionality,
for the compiler or SourceKit, for code-completion, indexing, etc.
Swift SVN r22003
While we work out the remaining performance improvements in the type checker, we can improve the user experience for some "runaway solver" bugs by setting a limit on the amount of temporary memory allocated for type variables when solving over a single expression.
Exponential behavior usually manifests itself while recursively attempting bindings over opened type variables in an expression. Each one of these bindings may result in one or more fresh type variables being created. On average, memory consumption by type variables is fairly light, but in some exponential cases it can quickly grow to many hundreds of megabytes or even gigabytes. (This memory is managed by a distinct arena in the AST context, so it's easy to track.) This problem is the source of many of the "freezing" compiler and SourceKit bugs we've been seeing.
These changes set a limit on the amount of memory that can be allocated for type variables while solving for a single expression. If the memory threshold is exceeded, we can surface a type error and suggest that the user decompose the expression into distinct, less-complex sub-expressions.
I've set the current threshold to 15MB which, experimentally, avoids false positives but doesn't let things carry on so long that the user feels compelled to kill the process before they can see an error message. (As a point of comparison, the largest allocation of type variable data while solving for a single expression in the standard library is 592,472 bytes.) I've also added a new hidden front-end flag, "solver-memory-threshold", that will allow users to set their own limit, in bytes.
Swift SVN r20986
We were already effectively doing this everywhere /except/ when building
the standard library (which used -O2), so just use the model we want going
forward.
Swift SVN r20455
This doesn't really affect anyone in real life, but it will catch cases
where someone's trying to compile for iOS without the iOS stdlib around.
Swift SVN r18796
This depends on c-index-test being available in the path.
This should work for CMake builds where swift is built
in its own build folder. I believe this will also work
for Makefile builds, but the buildbot will verify.
Swift SVN r5562
