The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
The only caveat is that:
1. We do not properly recognize when we have a let binding and we
perform a guaranteed dynamic call. In such a case, we add an extra
retain, release pair around the call. In order to get that case I will
need to refactor some code in Callee. I want to make this change, but
not at the expense of getting the rest of this work in.
2. Some of the protocol witness thunks generated have unnecessary
retains or releases in a similar manner.
But this is a good first step.
I am going to send a large follow up email with all of the relevant results, so
I can let the bots chew on this a little bit.
rdar://19933044
Swift SVN r27241
The deallocating parameter convention is a new convention put on a
non-trivial parameter if the caller function guarantees to the callee
that the parameter has the deallocating bit set in its object header.
This means that retains and releases do not need to be emitted on these
parameters even though they are non-trivial. This helps to solve a bug
in +0 self and makes it trivial for the optimizer to perform
optimizations based on this property.
It is not emitted yet by SILGen and will only be put on the self
argument of Deallocator functions.
Swift SVN r26179
sil-verifier was using SIL types to check metatypes. But metatypes, especially metatypes of metatypes, use AST types. Therefore checks should be done based on AST types.
rdar://20153162
Swift SVN r26111
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
rdar://problem/17198298
- Allow 'static' in protocol property and func requirements, but not 'class'.
- Allow 'static' methods in classes - they are 'class final'.
- Only allow 'class' methods in classes (or extensions of classes)
- Remove now unneeded diagnostics related to finding 'static' in previously banned places.
- Update relevant diagnostics to make the new rules clear.
Swift SVN r24260
I am starting to reuse manglings for different passes. I want to make sure that
when we reuse functions we actually get a function created by the same pass.
Swift SVN r23924
This is apart of creating the infrastructure for creating special manglings for
all of the passes that we specialize. The main motiviations for this
infrastructure is:
1. Create an easy method with examples on how to create these manglings.
2. Support multiple specializations. This is important once we allow for partial
specialization and can already occur if we perform function signature
optimizations on specialized functions.
The overall scheme is as follows:
_TTS<MANGLINGINFO>__<FUNCNAME>
Thus if we specialize twice, the first specialization will just be treated as
the function name for the second specialization.
<MANGLINGINFO> is defined as:
_<SPECIALIZATIONKINDID>_<SPECIALIZATIONUNIQUEINFO>
Where specialization kind is an enum that specifies the specific sort of
specialization we are performing and specialization unique info is enough
information to ensure that the identity of the function is appropriately
preserved.
Swift SVN r23801
Doing so is safe even though we have mock SDK. The include paths for
modules with the same name in the real and mock SDKs are different, and
the module files will be distinct (because they will have a different
hash).
This reduces test runtime on OS X by 30% and brings it under a minute on
a 16-core machine.
This also uncovered some problems with some tests -- even when run for
iOS configurations, some tests would still run with macosx triple. I
fixed the tests where I noticed this issue.
rdar://problem/19125022
Swift SVN r23683
This currently handles owned -> guaranteed argument conversion and dead argument
elimination.
RecursiveOwnedParameter||90.0%
ClassArrayGetter|||||||||23.3%
Life|||||||||||||||||||||16.7%
Prims||||||||||||||||||||11.2%
StringWalk|||||||||||||||5.7%
The next step is to implement SROA and address -> value optimizations.
rdar://16917049
Swift SVN r23023
Some AST nodes and SIL instructions need to reference conformances for a
particular type. If that type was imported from Clang, however, the
conformance may not exist when the AST node or SIL function gets deserialized
later. The SIL case is the problem case: fragile SIL code may contain a
reference to a conformance never mentioned in the AST of the code being
compiled, and since conformances are synthesized on demand during type-checking,
this will lead to a crash. SIL deserialization isn't supposed to be doing
work on its own (though it ~can~ import new Clang decls at the moment), so
the best answer is to serialize the conformances directly, like we would with
specialized or inherited conformances.
We can probably do better here in the long run (we don't even unique
conformances like this within a module), but this should at least handle the
immediately known problem cases.
rdar://problem/18669402
Swift SVN r22857
SIL functions use AST GenericParamTypeDecls, but they don't have a useful
DeclContext, so they just use the AST module associated with the current
SILModule. However, when it comes time to reserialize referenced functions
with shared_external linkage (such as closures defined in fragile public
functions), the serializer was trying to cross-reference those generic
parameters rather than reserialize them, because they aren't part of the
current source file. And because these decls aren't attached to a specific
AST DeclContext, we can't properly cross-reference them---nor should we.
This commit introduces a targeted case in the cross-reference logic to force
re-serializing these declarations. In the long run we may want to reconsider
using AST GenericParamLists for SILFunctions.
rdar://problem/18673024
Swift SVN r22800
This is needed for tests which define internal functions which should not be eliminated.
So far this was not needed because of a hack which prevented whole-module-optimizations for tests.
Swift SVN r22658
We serialize shared_external linkage as shared since:
1. shared_external linkage is just a hack to tell the optimizer that a
shared function was deserialized.
2. We can not just serialize a declaration to a shared_external function
since shared_external functions still have linkonce_odr linkage at the LLVM
level. This means they must be defined not just declared.
Swift SVN r22562
Since both shared and shared_external both lower to linkonce_odr, neither of
them can be declarations. This commit puts a check into the verifier to ensure
that this does not happen at the SIL level allowing us to catch such issues
earlier.
Swift SVN r22552
Eliminate the intermediate top_level_code function. Now that SIL is expressive enough to express a "main" function, there's no reason for it, and this eliminates a bunch of mystery code in IRGen to thunk from main to top_level_code by reaching for hardcoded symbol names. Demystify the special code for setting up C_ARGC and C_ARGV by having SILGen look for a transparent "_didEnterMain" hook in the stdlib and emit a call to it.
Swift SVN r22525
Those destructors are not referenced anywhere else in the SIL, but are used in the metadata
of a class. If they are private then dead function elimination would remove them.
This fixes <rdar://problem/18431856> unreachable executed at GenDecl.cpp:808
Swift SVN r22261
Now the SILLinkage for functions and global variables is according to the swift visibility (private, internal or public).
In addition, the fact whether a function or global variable is considered as fragile, is kept in a separate flag at SIL level.
Previously the linkage was used for this (e.g. no inlining of less visible functions to more visible functions). But it had no effect,
because everything was public anyway.
For now this isFragile-flag is set for public transparent functions and for everything if a module is compiled with -sil-serialize-all,
i.e. for the stdlib.
For details see <rdar://problem/18201785> Set SILLinkage correctly and better handling of fragile functions.
The benefits of this change are:
*) Enable to eliminate unused private and internal functions
*) It should be possible now to use private in the stdlib
*) The symbol linkage is as one would expect (previously almost all symbols were public).
More details:
Specializations from fragile functions (e.g. from the stdlib) now get linkonce_odr,default
linkage instead of linkonce_odr,hidden, i.e. they have public visibility.
The reason is: if such a function is called from another fragile function (in the same module),
then it has to be visible from a third module, in case the fragile caller is inlined but not
the specialized function.
I had to update lots of test files, because many CHECK-LABEL lines include the linkage, which has changed.
The -sil-serialize-all option is now handled at SILGen and not at the Serializer.
This means that test files in sil format which are compiled with -sil-serialize-all
must have the [fragile] attribute set for all functions and globals.
The -disable-access-control option doesn't help anymore if the accessed module is not compiled
with -sil-serialize-all, because the linker will complain about unresolved symbols.
A final note: I tried to consider all the implications of this change, but it's not a low-risk change.
If you have any comments, please let me know.
Swift SVN r22215
generates them.
Modify getAsCanonicalGenericSignature to dump same-type requirements last.
Also mix the conformance requirements on assocaited archetypes with the witness
markers.
SILParser used to put witness markers for all assocaited archetypes, then
add same-type requirements, and finally the conformance requirements on
associated archetypes. This causes mismatch types between deserialized
SILFunctionTypes and parsed SILFunctionTypes.
rdar://17998988
Swift SVN r21423
The second type of WitnessMarker for deserialized GenericSignature is null.
But the second type for parsed GenericSignature is not null, causing type
mismatch error when linking a SILFunction.
This commit ignores the second type of WitnessMarker when profiling the
GenericSignature.
rdar://17998988
Swift SVN r21178
We were already effectively doing this everywhere /except/ when building
the standard library (which used -O2), so just use the model we want going
forward.
Swift SVN r20455
*NOTE* This linkage is different from {Public,Hidden}External in that it has no
extra semantic meaning beyond shared.
The use of this linkage is to ensure that we do not serialize deserialized
shared functions. Those shared functions can always be re-deserialized from the
original module. This prevents a whole class of bugs related to the
creation of module cross references since all references to the shared
item go straight to the original module.
<rdar://problem/17772847>
Swift SVN r20375
In most cases this means adding @public to things that get serialized;
in a few cases it means using a modern public stdlib API instead of
a legacy thing I was trying to keep @internal.
Swift SVN r19350
