This name makes it clear that the function has not yet been deleted and also
contrasts with the past tense used in the API notifyAddedOrModifiedFunction to
show that said function has already added/modified the function.
The name notifyAddFunction is actively harmful since the pass manager uses this
entrypoint to notify analyses of added *OR* modified functions. It is up to the
caller analysis to distinguish in between these cases.
I am not vouching for the design, just trying to make names match the
current behavior.
From the perspective of the compiler implementation, they're elements. But users will think of these as cases—and many diagnostics already refer to these as enum cases.
I believe that this was just a typo from a long time ago. Calling this parameter
a SILAnalysisTy is actively misleading since as a result it seems to a naive
reading that one should be writing a recursive template:
```
class MyAnalysis : public FunctionAnalysisBase<MyAnalysis> { ... }
```
Instead of passing in the function info of the derived analysis, i.e.:
```
class MyAnalysisFunctionInfo { ... }
class MyAnalysis : public FunctionAnalysisBase<MyAnalysisFunctionInfo> { ... }
```
I also added some documentation to that affect onto FunctionAnalysisBase.
Generally in the SIL/SILOptimizer libraries we have been putting kinds in the
swift namespace, not a nested scope in a type in swift (see ValueKind as an
example of this).
Replace the last (and most obscure) use of the poor “use ‘?’ or ‘!’” diagnostic with the
new, more explanatory version that provides separate notes with Fix-Its for coalescing or
force-unwrapping the value.
Finishes rdar://problem/42081852.
Improve diagnostics when referencing a member of an optional base, where the
Optional type does not have the member but the wrapped type does. Specifically,
suggest both the chaining ‘?’ and the force-unwrapping ‘!’ Fix-Its via explanatory
notes, e.g.:
error: value of optional type '[Int]?' must be unwrapped to refer to member 'subscript' of wrapped base type '[Int]'
return foo.array[0]
^
note: chain the optional using '?' to access member 'subscript' only for non-'nil' base values
return foo.array[0]
^
?
note: force-unwrap using '!' to abort execution if the optional value contains 'nil'
return foo.array[0]
^
!
More of rdar://problem/42081852.
Some parts were using the more modern style that we are using in the optimizer
that involves having ivars and local variables be camelCase instead of
CamelCase.
When we determine that an optional value needs to be unwrapped to make
an expression type check, use notes to provide several different
Fix-It options (with descriptions) rather than always pushing users
toward '!'. Specifically, the errors + Fix-Its now looks like this:
error: value of optional type 'X?' must be unwrapped to a value of
type 'X'
f(x)
^
note: coalesce using '??' to provide a default when the optional
value contains 'nil'
f(x)
^
?? <#default value#>
note: force-unwrap using '!' to abort execution if the optional
value contains 'nil'
f(x)
^
!
Fixes rdar://problem/42081852.
Introduces the -name-bind frontend action that is intended as an intermediary between the parse-only actions and a full typechecking pass. In this phase, module imports will be validated and resolved, making it possible to emit full make-style dependencies files among other things.
Note that all information available to a parse-only pass is available to name binding, but because it does not continue-on to typecheck input files, full semantic information is not.
Parse-only invocations do not support the proper creation of dependency files or reference dependency files because they have not yet run name binding. Ban these invocations by diagnostic and add a new diagnostic specifically for reference dependencies.
The current dumping format consists of 1 row of information per function. This
will become unweildy to write patterns for when I add additional state to
FunctionInfo.
Instead, this commit converts the dumping format of the caller analysis into a
multi line yaml format. This yaml format looks as follows:
---
calleeName: closure1
hasCaller: false
minPartialAppliedArgs: 1
partialAppliers:
- partial_apply_one_arg
- partial_apply_two_args1
fullAppliers:
...
This can easily expand over time as we expand the queries that caller analysis
can answer.
As an additional advantage, there are definitely yaml parsers that can handle
multiple yaml documents in sequence in a stream. This means that by running via
sil-opt the caller-analysis-printer pass, one now will get a yaml description of
the caller analysis state, perfect and ready for analysis.
This converts a DenseMap to a SmallMapVector and a SetVector to a
SmallSetVector. Both of these create large malloced data structures by
default. This really makes no sense when there are many functions that don't use
a partial apply or many applies.
Additionally, by changing the DenseMap to a MapVector container, this commit is
eliminating a potential source of non-determinism in the compiler since often
times we are iterating over the DenseMap to produce the results. Today all of
the usages of the DenseMap in this way are safe, but to defensively future proof
this analysis, it makes sense to use a MapVector here.
I picked accessors that not only return the same result every time,
but also do no interesting validation work with possible side effects.
We have a lot more accessors that return the same result but also
force a bunch of things to be loaded or diagnostics to be emitted, and
I didn't want to change the behavior of any of those.
No intended functionality change; this is just supposed to be a small
optimization hint.
When users override a SDK function whose parameter types have been changed,
we should introduce a local variable in the body of the function definition
to shadow the changed parameter. Also, a proper conversion function should
be applied to bridge the parameter to the local variable.
rdar://41828411
