The typedef `swift::Module` was a temporary solution that allowed
`swift::Module` to be renamed to `swift::ModuleDecl` without requiring
every single callsite to be modified.
Modify all the callsites, and get rid of the typedef.
This patch allows SourceKit to generate the interface for a given type specified by its mangled name.
Type interface is refined decl printing with type parameters localized and unusable members hidden.
Required field:
"key.request": "source.request.editor.open.interface.swifttype"
"key.usr": the mangled name of the given type.
Cursor info requires access to the underlying AST, which is not
thread-safe. This manifest as crashes when performing concurrent
cursor-info requests on the same generated interface. We already
prevented concurrent cursor-infos on regular Swift files by using the
ASTManager, but generated interfaces use the InterfaceGenContext which
may use either an ASTUnit or its own internal CompilerInstance.
rdar://problem/27311624
Pass through the original Type in addition to the TypeDecl so that we
can distinguish DynamicSelfType with underlying ClassType from just any
old ClassType.
rdar://problem/25158493
This splits the printDeclNamEndLoc callback into NameEndLoc and
NameOrSignatureEndLoc variants to differentiate whether or not
signatures are included. All existing clients move to
NameOrSignatureEndLoc to maintain the current behaviour. I'm still not
completely happy with how these are named, but I dont' have any better
ideas right now.
rdar://problem/24292226
Input:
Request Id: 'source.request.editor.open.interface'
Required Field: 'key.modulename'
Optional Field: 'key.groupname'
Output:
If the group name is specified, SourceKit generates interface for the
module group; otherwise does for the entire module.
For a concrete type, members from its conforming protocols' extensions can be hard
to manually surface. In this commit, when printing Swift modules, we start to replicate these
extensions and synthesize them as if they are the concrete type's native extensions.
Credit to Doug for suggesting this practice.
The code goes into its own sub-tree under 'tools' but tests go under 'test',
so that running 'check-swift' will also run all the SourceKit tests.
SourceKit is disabled on non-darwin platforms.
