StdlibUnittest uses gyb to avoid duplicating many source-context
arguments. However, this means that any test that wishes to add new
expect helpers has to also be gybbed. Given that this structure hasn't
changed in years, and we should have a real language support
eventually, de-gyb it.
The change in CheckMutableCollectionType.swift.gyb previously resulted
in a runtime failure, and before that a compiler crash.
It appears that whatever type checker bug(s) were causing the issue
have been resolved in the last few months, so I'm returning this
closure to a single-expression form and cleaning up a couple other
places where we had an unneeded temporary as well.
Resolves rdar://problem/33781464.
* Make Range conditionally a Collection
* Convert ClosedRange to conditionally a collection
* De-gyb Range/ClosedRange, refactoring some methods.
* Remove use of Countable{Closed}Range from stdlib
* Remove Countable use from Foundation
* Fix test errors and warnings resulting from Range/CountableRange collapse
* fix prespecialize test for new mangling
* Update CoreAudio use of CountableRange
* Update SwiftSyntax use of CountableRange
* Restore ClosedRange.Index: Hashable conformance
* Move fixed typechecker slowness test for array-of-ranges from slow to fast, yay
* Apply Doug's patch to loosen test to just check for error
* Eradicate IndexDistance associated type, replacing with Int everywhere
* Consistently use Int for ExistentialCollection’s IndexDistance type.
* Fix test for IndexDistance removal
* Remove a handful of no-longer-needed explicit types
* Add compatibility shims for non-Int index distances
* Test compatibility shim
* Move IndexDistance typealias into the Collection protocol
* Refactor Indices and Slice to use conditional conformance
* Replace ReversedRandomAccessCollection with a conditional extension
* Refactor some types into struct+extensions
* Revise Slice documentation
* Fix test cases for adoption of conditional conformances.
* [RangeReplaceableCollection] Eliminate unnecessary slicing subscript operator.
* Add -enable-experimental-conditional-conformances to test.
* Gruesome workaround for crasher in MutableSlice tests
* [SR-4005] Allow heterogenous comparisons in elementsEqual
When a user is supplying a predicate to compare the type equivalence
isn’t required
* elementsEqualWithPredicate tests
Compares a string of a number with an integer value by using the
elementsEqualPredicate closure
* Update test expectations to use new sequence element types
* Update hardcoded test to reference sequence
Make the Indices types conform to the appropriate Collection protocol:
* Collection.Indices: Collection
* BidirectionalCollection.Indices: BidirectionalCollection
* RandomAccessCollection.Indices: RandomAccessCollection
Introduce (recursive) constraints that make the *Collection constraint
of SubSequence match that of its enclosing *Collection, e.g.,
MutableCollection.SubSequence conforms to MutableCollection.
Fixes rdar://problem/20715031 and more of SR-3453.
Addressed ABI FIXME’s #4, #5, #104 and #105, making Sequence’s
SubSequence conform to Sequence, with the same element type, and for
which the SubSequence of a SubSequence is the same SubSequence.
Fixes SR-318 / rdar://problem/31418206.
Addressed ABI FIXME’s #4, #5, #104 and #105, making Sequence’s
SubSequence conform to Sequence, with the same element type, and for
which the SubSequence of a SubSequence is the same SubSequence.
Fixes SR-318 / rdar://problem/31418206.
Part of ABI FIXME #99, this gives us some nice consistency that
ensures that slicing a SubSequence gives us another SubSequence. There
are two source-compatibility implications to this change:
* Collections now need to satisfy this property, which could not be
expressed in Swift 3. There might be some Collections that don't
satisfy this property, and will break with the Swift 4 compiler
*even in Swift 3 compatibility mode*. Case in point...
* The Lazy collection types were formulated as a lazy collection of
the base slice (e.g., LazyCollection<ArraySlice<T>>) rather than as
a slice of the lazy collection (e.g.,
Slice<LazyCollection<Array<T>>). The former doesn't meet the new
requirements, so change to the latter.
Top-level entry points fully testing a collection instance:
check${Traversal}Collection
One level of recursion into all slices of the collection instance
O(n^2). (Not combinatorial).
Previously, checkCollection() did nothing. So much of the testing infrastructure was inactive. Now it runs all forward collection tests.
Fixes a bug in subscriptRangeTests.
The UnsafeRawBufferPointer and Data collection testing is disabled and
will be fixed in the following commit.
* Add sliceability tests for Unsafe(Raw)BufferPointer.
Improve the generic sliceability tests to verify that SubSequence indices are
compatible with their parents indices.
* Fix and enable testing stdlib Collection instances.
Top-level entry points fully testing a collection instance:
check${Traversal}Collection
One level of recursion into all slices of the collection instance
O(n^2). (Not combinatorial).
Previously, checkCollection() did nothing. So much of the testing infrastructure was inactive. Now it runs all forward collection tests.
Fixes a bug in subscriptRangeTests.
The UnsafeRawBufferPointer and Data collection testing is disabled and
will be fixed in the following commit.
* Give UnsafeRawBufferPointer a distinct slice type.
SubSequence = RandomAccessSlice<Self>
* Fix raw buffer pointer tests after changing the API
* Add UnsafeRawBuffer(rebasing:) initializers.
Allows converting a raw slice into a zero-based raw buffer,
which is a common operation on flat memory.
Add and update UnsafeRawBufferPointer unit tests.
* Do not run recursive O(n^2) collection slice testing on large collections.
Now, even with collection unit testing wired up, the validation tests
take the same amount of time to execute.
* Add init(rebasing:) to UnsafeBufferPointer.
This is required for consistency with UnsafeRawBufferPointer.
* Update CHANGELOG.md for SE-0138 amendment: UnsafeRawBufferPointer slice type.
