- Make RawRepresentable Codable abstracts distinguishable
- Make the UnboundedRange example a little more user friendly
- Correct the RangeReplaceableCollection example description
- Revise CaseIterable discussion
Previously, both CountableRange and CountableClosedRange required
their bound types to be Strideable with a Stride type that conforms to
SignedInteger. Those constraints were not present on the generic
typealiases that replaced these structs. Add them back now, which
fixes the GRDB source compatibility regression.
Fixes https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6907 / rdar://problem/29066394.
When implementing a protocol requirement, additional doc comments are
unnecessary unless there are additional semantics peculiar to the specific
implementation.
The manually propagated documentation had several problems, including copypasta
and inconsistent terminology.
Therefore, if `T.==` doesn't have any doc comments and the implementation of
`T.hashValue` is unremarkable, remove the unnecessary doc comment.
This assumes these will land in Swift 4.1; the attributes need to be adjusted if that turns out not to be the case.
It seems @available for protocol conformances is not yet functional. I added attributes for those anyway, marked with FIXME(conformance-availability).
# Conflicts:
# stdlib/public/core/ExistentialCollection.swift.gyb
# stdlib/public/core/Mirror.swift
* Add conditional Hashable conformance to Optional, Dictionary, Array, ArraySlice and ContiguousArray
* Modified hashValue implementations
The hashValues are now calculated similar to the automatically synthesized values when conforming to Hashable.
This entails using _combineHashValues as values of the collections are iterated - as well as calling _mixInt before returning the hash.
* Added FIXMEs as suggested by Max Moiseev
* Use checkHashable to check Hashable conformance
* Use 2 space indentation
* Hashing of Dictionary is now independent of traversal order
* Added a test to proof failure of (previous) wrong implementation of Dictionary hashValue. Unfortunately it does not work.
* Removed '_mixInt' from 'hashValue' implementation of Optional and Array types based on recommendations from lorentey
* Another attempt at detecting bad hashing due to traversal order
* Dictionary Hashable validation tests now detect bad hashing due to dependence on traversal order
* Removed superfluous initial _mixInt call for Dictionary hashValue implementation.
* Add more elements to dictionary in test to increase the number of possible permutations - making it more likely to detect order-dependent hashes
* Added Hashable conformance to CollectionOfOne, EmptyCollection and Range types
* Fix indirect referral to the only member of CollectionOfOne
* Re-added Hashable conformance to Range after merge from master
* Change hashValue based on comment from @lorentey
* Remove tests for conditional Hashable conformance for Range types. This is left for a followup PR
* Added tests for CollectionOfOne and EmptyCollection
* Added conditional conformance fo Equatable and Hashable for DictionaryLiteral. Added tests too.
* Added conditional Equatable and Hashable conformance to Slice
* Use 'elementsEqual' for Slice equality operator
* Fixed documentation comment and indentation
* Fix DictionaryLiteral equality implementation
* Revert "Fix DictionaryLiteral equality implementation"
This reverts commit 7fc1510bc3.
* Fix DictionaryLiteral equality implementation
* Use equalElements(:by:) to compare DictionaryLiteral elements
* Added conditional conformance for Equatable and Hashable to AnyCollection
* Revert "Use 'elementsEqual' for Slice equality operator"
This reverts commit 0ba2278b96.
* Revert "Added conditional Equatable and Hashable conformance to Slice"
This reverts commit 84f9934bb4.
* Added conditional conformance for Equatable and Hashable for ClosedRange
In theory there could be a "fixed-layout" enum that's not exhaustive
but promises not to add any more cases with payloads, but we don't
need that distinction today.
(Note that @objc enums are still "fixed-layout" in the actual sense of
"having a compile-time known layout". There's just no special way to
spell that.)
* Remove Countable use from _ArrayBufferProtocol
* Mark _SwiftNativeNSArrayWithContiguousStorage's init @nonobjc
* Give {Closed}Range a _customIndexOfEquatableElement, supressing warning for _customContainsEquatableElement near-miss
* Eliminate CharacterView.init warning, since it's hard to supress and these things warn constantly.
- Adding docs for unbounded ranges
- Filling in missing docs for range-expression subscripts
- Equality operators for arrays
- Fix issues with range discussions
- Fill in missing integer docs
* Make Range conditionally a Collection
* Convert ClosedRange to conditionally a collection
* De-gyb Range/ClosedRange, refactoring some methods.
* Remove use of Countable{Closed}Range from stdlib
* Remove Countable use from Foundation
* Fix test errors and warnings resulting from Range/CountableRange collapse
* fix prespecialize test for new mangling
* Update CoreAudio use of CountableRange
* Update SwiftSyntax use of CountableRange
* Restore ClosedRange.Index: Hashable conformance
* Move fixed typechecker slowness test for array-of-ranges from slow to fast, yay
* Apply Doug's patch to loosen test to just check for error
The RangeProtocol was a very weak and fragile abstraction because it
didn't specify the interpretation of the endpoints. To write a
non-trivial algorithm, one usually needed to consult that information.
The standard library code only actually worked correctly with half-open
and closed ranges (and didn't handle fully open ranges, for example).
The other two protocols, HalfOpenRangeProtocol and ClosedRangeProtocol,
were only used for code sharing, and present an ABI burden. We can use
gyb instead.
We usually don't put descriptions and mirrors into default
implementations, but these protocols are special because users are not
allowed to declare conformances to them.
- Replaced RandomAccessIndex mentions from Strideable documentation
with stronger guarantees if Stride conforms to Integer.
- Other cleanup and revisions.
Right now, the rule is that any access of a stored property from a
constructor or destructor through 'self' must go directly to storage,
skipping observers or getter/setter overrides.
This means that in particular, constructors of resilient types cannot
be @_transparent, or defined in an extension in another module.
Previously, this was only caught in IRGen when the @_transparent
function was inlined into a function from another module, which made
debugging difficult.
Now, we hit an assert in Sema in this case. Of course it should be a
diagnostic; we'll get there eventually.
We could partially lift the restriction, allowing convenience
initializers to be defined @_transparent or be added in extensions,
by having accesses of stored properties from convenience inits go
through accessors. This would be safe, because at that point, we must
already have performed a self.init() delegation, however it would
potentially break existing code in subtle ways.
Also, this patch marks the RangeIterator and Range types @_fixed_layout,
since they define @_transparent initializers and this tripped the
new assert. Furthermore, note that the @_transparent initializer
must be versioned because it is inlined into another versioned
@_transparent function.
