Rather than mangling the complete generic signature of a constrained
extension, only mangle the requirements not already satisfied by the
nominal type. For example, given:
extension Dictionary where Value: Equatable {
// OLD: _T0s10DictionaryV2t3s8HashableRzs9EquatableR_r0_lE3baryyF
// NEW: _T0s10DictionaryV2t3s9EquatableR_rlE3baryyF
public func bar() { }
}
In the existing mangling, we mangle the `Key: Hashable` requirement that’s
part of the generic signature. With this change, we only mangle the new
requirement (`Value: Equatable`).
This is a win for constrained extensions *except* in the case of a
constrained extension of a nominal type with a single, unconstrained
generic parameter:
extension Array where Element: Equatable {
// OLD: _T0Sa2t3s9EquatableRzlE3baryyF
// NEW would be: _T0Sa2t3s9EquatableRzrlE3baryyF
public func bar() { }
}
Check explicily for this shortcut mangling and fall back to the old
path, so this change is a strict improvement.
I noticed in a follow-up patch that if you just swiftc without passing Onone
these flags are not set and sometimes happen to default to right thing ... or
not; as can be seen by the test cases modified. For example, at Onone we are
supposed to include an extra swift module "SwiftOnoneSupport".
For instance:
protocol P1 {
func foo()
}
protocol P2 : P1 {
func bar()
}
extension P2 {
func foo() {}
}
We report the foo() in P2's extension as the default implementation of foo() declared in P1.
