This makes us more lenient about what we accept for Objective-C
selectors by allowing you to include or not include the trailing colons.
We don't actually need that information, because we have access to the
declaration, so it was only being used for validation, which made the
API harder to use for clients that didn't carefully track zero vs
one-arg selector names.
Also remove the colons from the response, and instead add a bit to say
whether it is a zero-arg or one-arg selector. This makes the response
easier to use for clients that don't care about this information, and
more consistent with the change to the input.
rdar://problem/32177934
Extensive cross-language tooling support needs to bridge decl names between two different languages more freely. This SourceKit request is designed to translate Objc names to Swift names and vice versa. Working similarly to cursor-info requisition, the name translation request requires a Swift reference to a Swift/Clang decl, and the preferred name to translate from, and language kind that the given name belongs to. If the translation succeeds, SourceKit service responds with the corresponding name than belongs to the other kind of language.
Newly introduced keys:
“key.namekind": “source.lang.name.kind.objc” | "source.lang.name.kind.swift"
“key.basename”: “name"
“key.argnames”: [“name"]
“key.selectorpieces”: [“name[:]"]
This commit only implements translation from Objc to Swift.
