Stress tests are, by definition, stressful. They intentionally burn a
lot of resources by using randomness to hopefully surface state machine
bugs. Additionally, many stress tests are multi-threaded these days and
they may attempt to use all of the available CPUs to better uncover
bugs. In isolation, this is not a problem, but the test suite as a whole
assumes that individual tests are single threaded and therefore running
multiple stress tests at once can quickly spiral out of control.
This change formalizes stress tests and then treats them like long
tests, i.e. tested via 'check-swift-all' and otherwise opt-in.
Finally, with this change, the CI build bots might need to change if
they are still only testing 'validation' instead of all of the tests.
I see three options:
1) Run all of the tests. -- There are very few long tests left these
days, and the additional costs seems small relative to the cost of
the whole validation test suite before this change.
2) Continue checking 'validation', now sans stress tests.
3) Check 'validation', *then* the stress tests. If the former doesn't
pass, then there is no point in the latter, and by running the stress
tests separately, they stand a better chance of uncovering bugs and
not overwhelming build bot resources.
* Unify the capitalization across all user-visible error messages (fatal errors, assertion failures, precondition failures) produced by the runtime, standard library and the compiler.
* Update some more tests to the new expectations.
- CYGWIN symbol is used to distinguish Cygwin environment from other OS
and other environment in Windows.
- Added windows and windowsCygnus to OSVersion in StdlibUnittest
[test] Add a timeout to runRaceTest(). Use it to limit test AtomicInt.swift.
This cuts AtomicInt.swift's execution time from several hours to
about ten minutes on slow hardware and slow build configurations.
The new names are what people generally expect. The old names made more
sense in the old times when the 'Optional.None' case could not be
created with the 'nil' keyword.
As part of the extensive work on value types in Foundation this year, we
decided to also add value types for these three key classes. In addition
to adding value semantics, the API was extensively audited to improve
Swift interop (especially Calendar).
rdar://26628184
This reverts commit 46a9f57329.
This broke Swift CI, OSS incremental RA:
./swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/TimeZone.swift:228:45: error: 'NSTimeZone' is not implicitly convertible to 'TimeZone'; did you mean to use 'as' to explicitly convert?
return lhs._wrapped.isEqual(to: rhs._wrapped)
As part of the extensive work on value types in Foundation this year, we
decided to also add value types for these three key classes. In addition
to adding value semantics, the API was extensively audited to improve
Swift interop (especially Calendar).
rdar://26628184
This reverts commit 9c1f21bdf0.
This breaks swift-ci for everyone:
stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/Calendar.swift:426:74: error: 'DateInterval' is only available on iOS 10.0 or newer
public func dateInterval(of component: Component, for date: Date) -> DateInterval? {
As part of the extensive work on value types in Foundation this year, we
decided to also add value types for these three key classes. In addition
to adding value semantics, the API was extensively audited to improve
Swift interop (especially Calendar).
rdar://26628184
If a child process crashes outside of a test context, the parent process
should signal test failure. This behavior is a sign of something bad
happening in the child (for example, memory corruption), and should not
go unnoticed.
Previously, the callback for objc_setUncaughtExceptionHandler
took a parameter of type 'AnyObject!', which was implicitly
unwrapped at all uses inside the closure. When that became
'AnyObject?', we started getting an extra layer of Optional in
the printed output.
This reverts the tests to their pre-4d540c2a state.
Add Android to the OS checks used to determine whether to import Glibc.
These tests would pass on Android were it not for the fact that Android is not
included in the Glibc check.
Also add FreeBSD where missing.
This adds an Android target for the stdlib. It is also the first
example of cross-compiling outside of Darwin.
Mailing list discussions:
1. https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/Week-of-Mon-20151207/000171.html
2. https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/Week-of-Mon-20151214/000492.html
The Android variant of Swift may be built using the following `build-script`
invocation:
```
$ utils/build-script \
-R \ # Build in ReleaseAssert mode.
--android \ # Build for Android.
--android-ndk ~/android-ndk-r10e \ # Path to an Android NDK.
--android-ndk-version 21 \
--android-icu-uc ~/libicu-android/armeabi-v7a/libicuuc.so \
--android-icu-uc-include ~/libicu-android/armeabi-v7a/icu/source/common \
--android-icu-i18n ~/libicu-android/armeabi-v7a/libicui18n.so \
--android-icu-i18n-include ~/libicu-android/armeabi-v7a/icu/source/i18n/
```
Android builds have the following dependencies, as can be seen in
the build script invocation:
1. An Android NDK of version 21 or greater, available to download
here: http://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/index.html.
2. A libicu compatible with android-armv7.
Implements SE-0055: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0055-optional-unsafe-pointers.md
- Add NULL as an extra inhabitant of Builtin.RawPointer (currently
hardcoded to 0 rather than being target-dependent).
- Import non-object pointers as Optional/IUO when nullable/null_unspecified
(like everything else).
- Change the type checker's *-to-pointer conversions to handle a layer of
optional.
- Use 'AutoreleasingUnsafeMutablePointer<NSError?>?' as the type of error
parameters exported to Objective-C.
- Drop NilLiteralConvertible conformance for all pointer types.
- Update the standard library and then all the tests.
I've decided to leave this commit only updating existing tests; any new
tests will come in the following commits. (That may mean some additional
implementation work to follow.)
The other major piece that's missing here is migration. I'm hoping we get
a lot of that with Swift 1.1's work for optional object references, but
I still need to investigate.
