Do the same thing that we are already doing for trivia: Since RawSyntax
nodes always live inside a SyntaxArena, we don't need to tail-allocate
an OwnedString to store the token's text. Instead we can just copy it
to the SyntaxArena. If we copy the entire source buffer to the syntax
arena at the start of parsing, this means that no more copies are
required later on. Plus we also avoid ref-counting the OwnedString which
should also increase performance.
Instead, reference count the SyntaxData's parent. This has a couple of
advantages:
1. We eliminate a const_cast that was potentially unsafe
2. It more closely resembles the architecture on the Swift side
3. It has the potential to be optimised further if the parent can be
accessed in an unsafe, non-reference-counted way
- Stop producing 'backtick' trivia for escaping identifier token. '`'s
are now parts of the token text
- Adjust and simplify C++ libSyntax APIs
- Add 'is_deprecated' property to Trivia.py to attribute SwiftSyntax
APIs
rdar://problem/54810608
* Generate libSyntax API
This patch removes the hand-rolled libSyntax API and replaces it with an
API that's entirely automatically generated. This means the API is
guaranteed to be internally stylistically and functionally consistent.
Previously, users of TokenSyntax would always deal with RC<TokenSyntax>
which is a subclass of RawSyntax. Instead, provide TokenSyntax as a
fully-realized Syntax node, that will always exist as a leaf in the
Syntax tree.
This hides the implementation detail of RawSyntax and SyntaxData
completely from clients of libSyntax, and paves the way for future
generation of Syntax nodes.
Add an option to the lexer to go back and get a list of "full"
tokens, which include their leading and trailing trivia, which
we can index into from SourceLocs in the current AST.
This starts the Syntax sublibrary, which will support structured
editing APIs. Some skeleton support and basic implementations are
in place for types and generics in the grammar. Yes, it's slightly
redundant with what we have right now. lib/AST conflates syntax
and semantics in the same place(s); this is a first step in changing
that to separate the two concepts for clarity and also to get closer
to incremental parsing and type-checking. The goal is to eventually
extract all of the syntactic information from lib/AST and change that
to be more of a semantic/symbolic model.
Stub out a Semantics manager. This ought to eventually be used as a hub
for encapsulating lazily computed semantic information for syntax nodes.
For the time being, it can serve as a temporary place for mapping from
Syntax nodes to semantically full lib/AST nodes.
This is still in a molten state - don't get too close, wear appropriate
proximity suits, etc.
