* Factor out ASTContext plugin loading to newly introduced 'PluginLoader'
* Insert 'DependencyTracker' to 'PluginLoader'
* Add dependencies right before loading the plugins
rdar://104938481
Make a single 'PluginRegistry' and share it between SwiftASTManager,
IDEInspectionInstance, and CompileInstance. And inject the plugin
registry to ASTContext right after 'CompilerInstance.setup()'
That way, all sema-capable ASTContext in SourceKit share a single
PluginRegistry.
This hooks up the cursor info infrastructure to be able to pass through multiple, ambiguous results. There are still minor issues that cause solver-based cursor info to not actually report the ambiguous results but those will be fixed in a follow-up PR.
This allows us to model the `ResolvedCursorInfo` types as a proper type hierarchy instead of having to store all values in the base `ResolvedCursorInfo` type.
rdar://102853071
Macro expansion buffers, along with other generated source buffers,
need more precise "original source ranges" that can be had with the
token-based `SourceRange`. Switch over to `CharSourceRange` and provide
more thoughtfully-determined original source ranges.
The main problem that prevented us from reusing the ASTContext was that we weren’t remapping the `LocToResolve` in the temporary buffer that only contains the re-parsed function back to the original buffer. Thus `NodeFinder` couldn’t find the node that we want to get cursor info for.
Getting AST reuse to work for top-level items is harder because it currently heavily relies on the `HasCodeCompletion` state being set on the parser result. I’ll try that in a follow-up PR.
rdar://103251263
Each macro expansion buffer was getting parsed twice: once by
ParseSourceFileRequest (which is used by unqualified name lookup) and
once to parse the expression when type-checking the expanded macro.
This meant that the same code had two ASTs. Hilarity ensures.
Stop directly invoking the parser on macro-expanded code. Instead, go
through ParseSourceFileRequest *as is always the right way*, and dig
out the expression we want.
We need swiftsourcedocinfo for cursor info and to be able to reuse the ASTContext from code completion for cursor info, we need to also retrieve the sourcedocinfo for code completion requests.
Establish the relationship for generated sources, whether for macro
expansions or (via a small stretch) replacing function bodies with
other bodies, in the source manager itself. This makes the information
available for diagnostic rendering, and unifies a little bit of the
representation, although it isn't used for much yet.
