Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kuba (Brecka) Mracek
a395db680a [Concurrency] Avoid #include-ing dlfcn.h when not available (#41276) 2022-02-09 09:41:04 -08:00
Max Desiatov
372ada0e24 test: add handling for Wasm/WASI (#39519)
This change adds support for WASI in stdlib tests. Some tests that expect a crash to happen had to be disabled, since there's currently no way to observe such crash from a WASI host.
2022-01-12 14:24:50 +00:00
Mike Ash
d5c0469f3e [Concurrency] Replace SWIFT_TASK_PRINTF_DEBUG with a SWIFT_TASK_DEBUG_LOG macro.
This macro takes the string and parameters directly, and is conditionally defined to either call fprintf or ignore its arguments. This makes the call sites a little more pleasant (no #if scattered about) and ensures every log includes the thread ID and a newline automatically.
2021-08-25 10:47:36 -04:00
Julian Lettner
558a0cc605 Add tsan_release edge on task creation (#38074)
* Synchronize both versions of actor_counters.swift test

* Synchronize on Job address

Make sure to synchronize on Job address (AsyncTasks are Jobs, but not
all Jobs are AsyncTasks).

* Add fprintf debug output for TSan acquire/release

* Add tsan_release edge on task creation

without this, we are getting false data races between when a task
is created and immediately scheduled on a different thread.

False positive for `Sanitizers/tsan/actor_counters.swift` test:
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=81452)
  Read of size 8 at 0x7b2000000560 by thread T5:
    #0 Counter.next() <null>:2 (a.out:x86_64+0x1000047f8)
    #1 (1) suspend resume partial function for worker(identity:counters:numIterations:) <null>:2 (a.out:x86_64+0x100005961)
    #2 swift::runJobInEstablishedExecutorContext(swift::Job*) <null>:2 (libswift_Concurrency.dylib:x86_64+0x280ef)

  Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2000000560 by main thread:
    #0 Counter.init(maxCount:) <null>:2 (a.out:x86_64+0x1000046af)
    #1 Counter.__allocating_init(maxCount:) <null>:2 (a.out:x86_64+0x100004619)
    #2 runTest(numCounters:numWorkers:numIterations:) <null>:2 (a.out:x86_64+0x100006d2e)
    #3 swift::runJobInEstablishedExecutorContext(swift::Job*) <null>:2 (libswift_Concurrency.dylib:x86_64+0x280ef)
    #4 main <null>:2 (a.out:x86_64+0x10000a175)
```

New edge with this change:
```
[4357150208] allocate task 0x7b3800000000, parent = 0x0
[4357150208] creating task 0x7b3800000000 with parent 0x0
[4357150208] tsan_release on 0x7b3800000000    <<< new release edge
[139088221442048] tsan_acquire on 0x7b3800000000
[139088221442048] trying to switch from executor 0x0 to 0x7ff85e2d9a00
[139088221442048] switch failed, task 0x7b3800000000 enqueued on executor 0x7ff85e2d9a00
[139088221442048] enqueue job 0x7b3800000000 on executor 0x7ff85e2d9a00
[139088221442048] tsan_release on 0x7b3800000000
[139088221442048] tsan_release on 0x7b3800000000
[4357150208] tsan_acquire on 0x7b3800000000
counters: 1, workers: 1, iterations: 1
[4357150208] allocate task 0x7b3c00000000, parent = 0x0
[4357150208] creating task 0x7b3c00000000 with parent 0x0
[4357150208] tsan_release on 0x7b3c00000000    <<< new release edge
[139088221442048] tsan_acquire on 0x7b3c00000000
[4357150208] task 0x7b3800000000 waiting on task 0x7b3c00000000, going to sleep
[4357150208] tsan_release on 0x7b3800000000
[4357150208] tsan_release on 0x7b3800000000
[139088221442048] getting current executor 0x0
[139088221442048] tsan_release on 0x7b3c00000000
...
```

rdar://78932849

* Add static_cast<Job *>()

* Move TSan release edge to swift_task_enqueueGlobal()

Move the TSan release edge from `swift_task_create_commonImpl()` to
`swift_task_enqueueGlobalImpl()`.  Task creation itself is not an event
that needs synchronization, but rather that task creation "happens
before" execution of that task on another thread.

This edge is usually added when the task is scheduled via
`swift_task_enqueue()` (which then usually calls
`swift_task_enqueueGlobal()`).  However, not all task scheduling goes
through the `swift_task_enqueue()` funnel as some places call the more
specific `swift_task_enqueueGlobal()` directly.  So let's annotate this
function (duplicate edges aren't harmful) to ensure we cover all
schedule events, including newly-created tasks (our original problem
here).

rdar://78932849

Co-authored-by: Julian Lettner <julian.lettner@apple.com>
2021-06-25 18:40:53 -07:00
Julian Lettner
e1b82d852d Remove dlsym() lookup for TSan functions from common path (#36478)
* Move TSan function lookup out of the common path

Move TSan function lookup via `dlsym()` out of the common path.  The
TSan runtime will now call `__tsan_on_initialize()` which we can use to
initialize the TSan functions in the Swift runtime.

This avoids paying the cost of `dlsym()` in the common, non-TSan case.

Depends on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98810

rdar://75493372

* Remove Windows code

Thread Sanitizer is not supported on Windows.

Co-authored-by: Julian Lettner <julian.lettner@apple.com>
2021-04-06 09:16:47 -07:00
Julian Lettner
8abf12fbe6 Add swift_task_set_tsan_hooks()
This change will be sequenced:
  1. Call this hook from the TSan runtime
  2. Remove `dlsym()` lookup from Swift runtime
2021-03-16 13:43:55 -07:00
Julian Lettner
99bcd87af6 Use swift_once instead of C++ static initializers 2021-03-12 14:52:56 -08:00
Julian Lettner
ea5bb777e2 Fix TSan symbol lookup on Windows 2021-03-01 16:08:34 -08:00
Julian Lettner
5187382f25 Add support for calling TSan's acquire()/release() 2021-03-01 13:35:03 -08:00