Previously 'isSystemModule()' returns true only if the module is:
- Standard library
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
Now:
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`; or
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
- Swift module found in either of these directories:
- Runtime library directoris (including stdlib)
- Frameworks in `-Fsystem` directories
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/System/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
rdar://problem/50516314
This commit adds a new type DynamicLookupInfo that provides information
about how a dynamic member lookup found a particular Decl. This is
needed to correctly handle KeyPath dynamic member lookups, but for now
just plumb it through everywhere.
- In Sema, don't traverse nested declarations while deducing the opaque return type. This would
cause returns inside nested functions to clobber the return type of the outer function.
- In IRGen, walk the list of opaque return types we keep in the SourceFile already for type
reconstruction, instead of trying to visit them ad-hoc as part of walking the AST, since
IRGen doesn't normally walk the bodies of function decls directly.
Fixes rdar://problem/50459091
When printing a swiftinterface, represent opaque result types using an attribute that refers to
the mangled name of the defining decl for the opaque type. To turn this back into a reference
to the right decl's implicit OpaqueTypeDecl, use type reconstruction. Since type reconstruction
doesn't normally concern itself with non-type decls, set up a lookup table in SourceFiles and
ModuleFiles to let us handle the mapping from mangled name to opaque type decl in type
reconstruction.
(Since we're invoking type reconstruction during type checking, when the module hasn't yet been
fully validated, we need to plumb a LazyResolver into the ASTBuilder in an unsightly way. Maybe
there's a better way to do this... Longer term, at least, this surface design gives space for
doing things more the right way--a more request-ified decl validator ought to be able to naturally
lazily service this request without the LazyResolver reference, and if type reconstruction in
the future learns how to reconstruct non-type decls, then the lookup tables can go away.)
When a Swift module built with debug info imports a library without
debug info from a textual interface, the textual interface is
necessary to reconstruct types defined in the library's interface. By
recording the Swift interface files in DWARF dsymutil can collect them
and LLDB can find them.
rdar://problem/49751363
This is an attribute that gets put on an import in library FooKit to
keep it from being a requirement to import FooKit. It's not checked at
all, meaning that in this form it is up to the author of FooKit to
make sure nothing in its API or ABI depends on the implementation-only
dependency. There's also no debugging support here (debugging FooKit
/should/ import the implementation-only dependency if it's present).
The goal is to get to a point where it /can/ be checked, i.e. FooKit
developers are prevented from writing code that would rely on FooKit's
implementation-only dependency being present when compiling clients of
FooKit. But right now it's not.
rdar://problem/48985979
...in preparation for me adding a third kind of import, making the
existing "All" kind a problem. NFC, except that I did rewrite the
ClangModuleUnit implementation of getImportedModules to be simpler!
This is only currently exercised by swift-remoteast-test, so do the
minimum to ensure that we’re getting cached mangled names, but don’t
fret over the linear-time search.
Instead of creating multiple CodeBlockItemList nodes, that need to get merged and discarded later on, do this:
* Ensure for libSyntax parsing that we parse the whole file
* Create top-level CodeBlockItem nodes that we just directly wrap with a single CodeBlockItemList node at the end
The importance of this change will become more obvious later on when we'll decouple syntax parsing from the formation of libSyntax tree nodes.
When debugging Objective-C or C++ code on Darwin, the debug info
collected by dsymutil in the .dSYM bundle is entirely
self-contained. It is possible to debug a program, set breakpoints and
print variables even without having the complete original source code
or a matching SDK available. With Swift, this is currently not the
case. Even though .dSYM bundles contain the binary .swiftmodule for
all Swift modules, any Clang modules that the Swift modules depend on,
still need to be imported from source to even get basic LLDB
functionality to work. If ClangImporter fails to import a Clang
module, effectively the entire Swift module depending on it gets
poisoned.
This patch is addressing this issue by introducing a ModuleLoader that
can ask queries about Clang Decls to LLDB, since LLDB knows how to
reconstruct Clang decls from DWARF and clang -gmodules producxes full
debug info for Clang modules that is embedded into the .dSYM budle.
This initial version does not contain any advanced functionality at
all, it merely produces an empty ModuleDecl. Intertestingly, even this
is a considerable improvement over the status quo. LLDB can now print
Swift-only variables in modules with failing Clang depenecies, and
becuase of fallback mechanisms that were implemented earlier, it can
even display the contents of pure Objective-C objects that are
imported into Swift. C structs obviously don't work yet.
rdar://problem/36032653
A module compiled with `-enable-private-imports` allows other modules to
import private declarations if the importing source file uses an
``@_private(from: "SourceFile.swift") import statement.
rdar://29318654
Added the 'Module::getPrecedenceGroups' API to separate precedence group lookup
from 'Module::lookupVisibleDecls', which together with 'FileUnit::lookupVisibleDecls',
to which the former is forwarded, are expected to look up only 'ValueDecl'. In particular, this
prevents completions like Module.PrecedenceGroup.
Module references get indexed as a 'module' symbol; they get USRs similar to how clang would assign a USR for a module reference.
JIRA: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-8677
...like LLDB does, instead of parsing into a single SourceFile.
This does break some functionality:
- no more :dump_ast
- no redeclaration checking, but no shadowing either---redeclarations
just become ambiguous
- pretty much requires EnableAccessControl to be off, since we don't
walk decls to promote them to 'public'
...but it allows us to remove a bit of longstanding support for
type-checking / SILGen-ing / IRGen-ing only part of a SourceFile that
was only used by the integrated REPL.
...which, need I remind everyone, is still /deprecated/...but sometimes
convenient. So most of it still works.
This silences the instances of the warning from Visual Studio about not all
codepaths returning a value. This makes the output more readable and less
likely to lose useful warnings. NFC.
Fixes a longstanding issue where submodules with the same name in
different top-level modules weren't being sorted deterministically.
This doesn't come up very much in practice, and it would have been
hard to notice anything wrong, but it's good to be right.
Package up the logic that generates a full Clang module name, so that
(a) we don't have to deal with clang::Module in quite as many places
in the /Swift/ compiler, and (b) we can avoid the cost of a temporary
string in a few places.
The main places where this is /not/ adopted is where we don't just
want to know the parent module name, but actually the module itself.
This is mostly indexing-related queries, which use the very similar
ModuleEntity class also defined in Module.h. I didn't quite see an
obvious way to unify these, but that might be where we want to go.
No functionality change.
A few places around the compiler were checking for this module by its
name. The implementation still checks by name, but at least that only
has to occur in one place.
(Unfortunately I can't eliminate the string constant altogether,
because the implicit import for SwiftOnoneSupport happens by name.)
No functionality change.
- getAsDeclOrDeclExtensionContext -> getAsDecl
This is basically the same as a dyn_cast, so it should use a 'getAs'
name like TypeBase does.
- getAsNominalTypeOrNominalTypeExtensionContext -> getSelfNominalTypeDecl
- getAsClassOrClassExtensionContext -> getSelfClassDecl
- getAsEnumOrEnumExtensionContext -> getSelfEnumDecl
- getAsStructOrStructExtensionContext -> getSelfStructDecl
- getAsProtocolOrProtocolExtensionContext -> getSelfProtocolDecl
- getAsTypeOrTypeExtensionContext -> getSelfTypeDecl (private)
These do /not/ return some form of 'this'; instead, they get the
extended types when 'this' is an extension. They started off life with
'is' names, which makes sense, but changed to this at some point. The
names I went with match up with getSelfInterfaceType and
getSelfTypeInContext, even though strictly speaking they're closer to
what getDeclaredInterfaceType does. But it didn't seem right to claim
that an extension "declares" the ClassDecl here.
- getAsProtocolExtensionContext -> getExtendedProtocolDecl
Like the above, this didn't return the ExtensionDecl; it returned its
extended type.
This entire commit is a mechanical change: find-and-replace, followed
by manual reformatted but no code changes.
Use the declaration-based name lookup facilities to re-implement
ProtocolDecl::getInheritedProtocols(), rather than dynamically selecting
between the requirement signature and the inherited types. This reduces
dependencies for this computation down to basic name lookup (no semantic
analysis) and gives us a stable result.
More groundwork for protocols with superclass constraints.
In several places we need to distinguish between existential
types that have a superclass term (MyClass & Proto) and
existential types containing a protocol with a superclass
constraint.
This is similar to how I can write 'AnyObject & Proto', or
write 'Proto1 & Proto2' where Proto1 has an ': AnyObject'
in its inheritance clause.
Note that some of the usages will be revisited later as
I do more refactoring and testing. This is just a first pass.
This is unfortunate in that it makes the linker do extra work, but in
practice it probably doesn't matter much, and meanwhile it handles all
our problems with @inlinable.
Alternate solution to rdar://problem/39338239
This reverts commit bb16ee049d,
reversing changes made to a8d831f5f5.
It's not sufficient to solve the problem, and the choices were to do
something more complicated, or just take a simple brute force
approach. We're going with the latter.
This reverts commit ee6e190e09. It's not
sufficient to solve the problem, and the choices were to do something
more complicated, or just take a simple brute force approach. We're
going with the latter.
This can't arise from a clean build, but it can happen if you have
products lingering in a search path and then either rebuild one of
the modules in the cycle, or change the search paths.
The way this is implemented is for each module to track whether its
imports have all been resolved. If, when loading a module, one of its
dependencies hasn't resolved all of its imports yet, then we know
there's a cycle.
This doesn't produce the best diagnostics, but it's hard to get into
this state in the first place, so that's probably okay.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7483
