trie parameters and fix a few bugs
The bugs did not affect correctness of the particular instance of trie created
for grapheme cluster property, because trie parameters that were confused with
each other happened to be equal.
Also, fix a trie size bug: we were creating a trie large enough to store
information for 0x200000 code points, but there are only 0x10ffff. It saved
only 15 bytes in the grapheme cluster tree, because that extra information was
compressed with some supplementary planes that also had default values. This
also improved trie generation time by almost 2x.
Swift SVN r19457
We're temporarily using @semantics until we have mandatory inlining of branch hints.
We now have @noinline, which helps a lot, but:
- @noinline and "cold/slow" are not the same thing.
- Some functions may need to be inlined into hot paths, but that
doesn't mean we should also inline them into cold paths.
- It is easier to find cold blocks than to look for blocks that
contain calls to @noinline functions. And that doesn't necessarilly
mean the blocks are cold anyway.
Swift SVN r19455
COMPILE_FLAGS is currently used for two purposes:
- For any target library, add the appropriate Swift optimization flags. This eliminates the add_swift_optimization_flags boilerplate and makes these flags work for all library variants
- For the runtime, pass the appropriate define down when SWIFT_RUNTIME_CLOBBER_FREED_OBJECTS is set, so that all library variants get this setting.
Swift SVN r19444
This consolidates the \x, \u, and \U escape sequences into one \u{abc} escape sequence.
For now we still parse and cleanly reject the old forms with a nice error message, this
will eventually be removed in a later beta (tracked by rdar://17527814)
Swift SVN r19435
This does not yet handle variables with inferred types, since those don't
have TypePatterns.
There is some nasty propagation of @public into the stdlib because of this
one, mainly because Foundation needs access to some of the implementation
details of Array and Dictionary. We may want to try to improve this later
(or just build Foundation with -disable-access-control if it comes to that).
Swift SVN r19432
The one design choice here was whether to expose the pointee directly through the Mirror
My choice was against that. Instead, we present UnsafePointer as UnsafePointer(0x123) and the child we expose is the 0x123 numeric pointer value
The other option, of course, would be to present it as UnsafePointer(reflect(memory)) - but that seems risky to do by default
UnsafePointers are allowed to be in, guess what, unsafe states, and the stakes of having playgrounds try and dereference at all times are quite too high.
If the user really wants to reflect the pointee reflect(pointer.memory) will do it for them - and then any crashes will be theirs to enjoy.
Of course, I am very open to arguments as to why reflect(memory) would be a better choice.
Swift SVN r19386
...unless the type has less accessibility than the protocol, in which case
they must be as accessible as the type.
This restriction applies even with access control checking disabled, but
shouldn't affect any decls not already marked with access control modifiers.
Swift SVN r19382
- Follow LLVM conventions for emacs mode specification
- Use local variables suffix to make the output read-only (at least on
Emacs)
- But drop the admonitions not to edit the generated files;
line-directive mostly takes care of that problem now.
Swift SVN r19381
Fixes <rdar://problem/17028678> comments for sort() don't make sense in
the synthesized header. Putting the right comments in there is
<rdar://problem/17511801> Algorithm.swift needs doc comments
Swift SVN r19370
As before, there may be more things marked @public than we actually want
public. Judicious use of the frontend option -disable-access-control may
help reduce the public surface area of the stdlib.
Swift SVN r19353
algorithm
The implementation uses a specialized trie that has not been tuned to the table
data. I tried guessing parameter values that should work well, but did not do
any performance measurements.
There is no efficient way to initialize arrays with static data in Swift. The
required tables are being generated as C++ code in the runtime library.
rdar://16013860
Swift SVN r19340
underlying NSString when it ends in a high-surrogate code unit
The tests did not catch this because they were creating CFString, which,
as it turns out, does not perform bounds checking. Replaced the use of
CFString with a custom NSString subclass.
Swift SVN r19329
This one shows the unfortunate consequence that we need
Lazy[Forward|Bidirectional|RandomAccess]Collection. There's gonna be a
whole lotta gyb'bing going on...
Swift SVN r19316
It's both more rigorously correct and should prevent surprise when
constructing an Array from a filtered sequence. See the comments
in-code for details.
Swift SVN r19304
We haven't been advertising this syntax much, and it's closure form
was completely broken anyway, so don't jump through hoops to provide
great Fix-Its here.
Swift SVN r19277
