When visiting consumes, also visit `extend_lifetime` instructions.
These instructions are not lifetime ending, but together with the
consumes, they enclose the users of a value.
Add a flag to LinearLiveness to control whether these instructions are
added so that the verifier can use verify that all such instructions
appear outside the linear lifetime boundary (not including them).
The buffer of global arrays could already be statically initialized.
The missing piece was the array itself, which is basically a reference to the array buffer.
For example:
```
var a = [1, 2, 3]
```
ends up in two statically initialized globals:
1. the array buffer, which contains the elements
2. the variable `a` which is a single reference (= pointer) of the array buffer
This optimization removes the need for lazy initialization of such variables.
rdar://127757554
Add a unit test harness to SwiftCompilerSources to match the one in C++ since
both source bases have different implementations of the same utilities, and they
must be consistent for correctness.
The copy operator has been implemented and doesn't use it. Remove
`Builtin.copy` and `_copy` as much as currently possible.
Source compatibility requires that `_copy` remain in the stdlib. It is
deprecated here and just uses the copy operator.
Handling old swiftinterfaces requires that `Builtin.copy` be defined.
Redefine it here as a passthrough--SILGen machinery will produce the
necessary copy_addr.
rdar://127502242
Changes in this CR add part of the, Swift based, Autodiff specific
closure specialization optimization pass. The pass does not modify any
code nor does it even exist in any of the optimization pipelines. The
rationale for pushing this partially complete optimization pass upstream
is to keep up with the breaking changes in the underlying Swift based
compiler infrastructure.
Compute, update and handle borrowed-from instruction in various utilities and passes.
Also, used borrowed-from to simplify `gatherBorrowIntroducers` and `gatherEnclosingValues`.
Replace those utilities by `Value.getBorrowIntroducers` and `Value.getEnclosingValues`, which return a lazily computed Sequence of borrowed/enclosing values.
Under OSSA, the instruction may still be structurally responsible for consuming
its operand even if the result is dead, so we can't remove it without breaking
invariants.
More generally, this should probably apply to any instruction which consumes
one or more of its operands, has no side effects, and doesn't produce any
nontrivial results that require further consumption to keep the value alive.
I went with this targeted fix, since it addresses a problem that shows up
in practice (rdar://125381446) and the more general change appears to
disturb the optimizer pipeline while building the standard library.
Don't treat StoreBorrow addresses as unknown bases. While they are never the base of a formal access, they are returned
as the AccessBase when querying the enclosing scope of an address.
Treat mark_dependence [nonescaping] as a dependent value even if the dependence base does not have a recognizable
scope (e.g. a multiply-defined alloc_stack). This happens because ClosureLifetimeFixup creates redundant mark_dependence
instructions for partial_apply captures. We constantly need to work around this broken representation of nonescaping closures.
Add PartialApplyInst.hasNoescapeCapture
Add PartialApplyInst.mayEscape
Refactor DiagnoseInvalidEscapingCaptures. This may change functionality because tuples containing a noescape closure are now correctly recognized. Although I'm not sure such tupes can ever be captured directly.
SILBoxTypes have their own generic signature and substitution
map. This means that every time we query isEscapable or mayEscape, we
need to extract the type of the box's field and perform type
substitution so that the AST query only sees types from the function's
generic environment.
Fixes rdar://124179106 (Assertion failed in SIL:
(!type->hasTypeParameter() && "caller forgot to mapTypeIntoContext!"))
