Teach the constraint system to use the same primitives as elsewhere to
determine the type context for a `throw` statement and the caught
error type within a `do..catch` statement. This makes
explicitly-specified `throws` work on `do..catch` that occurs in
closures.
Cleans up some redundant computations for caught error types.
These two requests are effectively doing the same thing to two
different cases within CatchNode. Unify the requests into a single
request, ExplicitCaughtTypeRequest, which operates on a CatchNode.
This also moves the logic for closures with explicitly-specified throws
clauses into the same request, taking it out of the constraint system.
Some notes:
This is not emitted by SILGen. This is just intended to be used so I can write
SIL test cases for transfer non sendable. I did this by adding an
ActorIsolationCrossing field to all FullApplySites rather than adding it into
the type system on a callee. The reason that this makes sense from a modeling
perspective is that an actor isolation crossing is a caller concept since it is
describing a difference in between the caller's and callee's isolation. As a
bonus it makes this a less viral change.
For simplicity, I made it so that the isolation is represented as an optional
modifier on the instructions:
apply [callee_isolation=XXXX] [caller_isolation=XXXX]
where XXXX is a printed representation of the actor isolation.
When neither callee or caller isolation is specified then the
ApplyIsolationCrossing is std::nullopt. If only one is specified, we make the
other one ActorIsolation::Unspecified.
This required me to move ActorIsolationCrossing from AST/Expr.h ->
AST/ActorIsolation.h to work around compilation issues... Arguably that is where
it should exist anyways so it made sense.
rdar://118521597
The spelling kind was only ever set to
`StaticSpellingKind::None`, and the static location
was never used for anything (and should be queried
on the storage anyway). This doesn't affect the
computation of `isStatic` since `IsStaticRequest`
already takes the static-ness from the storage for
accessors.
Both `try?` and `try!` are catch nodes, because they catch an error
thrown in their subexpression and handle it. Introduce an ASTScope for
all `try/try?/try1` expressions so we can find them, and model them as
catch nodes.
Fixes rdar://119216455.
Now that the macro expansion machinery is wrapping the contents of a
body macro in curly braces, parse it as a single brace statement. This
has the advantage of giving us real locations for `{` and `}` rather
than synthesizing them, and simplifies the implementation of macro
body expansion somewhat.
During the review of SE-0413, typed throws, the notion of a `do throws`
syntax for `do..catch` blocks came up. Implement that syntax and
semantics, as a way to explicitly specify the type of error that is
thrown from the `do` body in `do..catch` statement.
Preamble macros introduce code at the beginning of a function body.
Allow them to introduce declarations as well, so long as the macro
declaration properly declares the names it introduces. This allows all
sorts of exciting macros that introduce (e.g.) new local variables
that one can use.
This accidentally started happening when I adjusted getEffectiveAccess to return `Public` for `Package` declarations in #69709. As a result, the optimizer thought it had more opportunities to go after declarations that used to be opaque. Unfortunately, this resulted in a miscompile as the devirtualizer was able to look through now-serialized package (static) functions. In one specific instance, the optimizer created direct calls to hidden accessors instead of going through the dispatch thunk.
Function body macros allow one to introduce a function body for a
particular function, either providing a body for a function that
doesn't have one, or wholesale replacing the body of a function that
was written with a new one.
The "typechecked function body" request was defined to type-check a
function body that is known to be present, and not skipped, and would
assert these conditions, requiring its users to check whether a body
was expected. Often, this means that callers would use `getBody()`
instead, which retrieves the underlying value in whatever form it
happens to be, and assume it has been mutated appropriately.
Make the "typechecked function body" request, triggered by
`getTypecheckedBody()`, more resilient and central. A `NULL` result is
now acceptable, signifying that there is no body. Clients will need to
tolerate NULL results.
* When there is no body but should be one, produce an appropriate
error.
* When there shouldn't be a body but is, produce an appropriate error
* Handle skipping of function bodies here, rather than elsewhere.
Over time, we should move clients off of `getBody` and `hasBody`
entirely, and toward `getTypecheckedBody` or some yet-to-be-introduced
forms like `getBodyAsWritten` for the pre-typechecked body.
Yet more preprocessor metaprogramming to eliminate per-macro-role boilerplate
in the compiler. This time, focused on mangling, demangling, and remangling
of the accessor macro roles.
Previously, the initializer expressions of lazy vars would only be marked as
subsumed when the getter body for the var was synthesized. This didn't work
with `-experimental-lazy-typechecking` since accessor synthesis was not
guaranteed to happen. Consequently, SILGen would emit the initializer even
though it was already subsumed and then assert/crash since the init had also
not been checked and contextualized. Now lazy var inits are marked subsumed in
the request creating storage.
Resolves rdar://118421753
As a follow up to https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/69841, clarify the
possible states that initializer expression of a pattern can be in. The
possible states are not checked, checked, and "checked and contextualized"
(which is the new state that was introduced and requestified in the previous
PR). This refactoring encodes the states more explicitly and renames a few
compiler APIs to better align with the new naming. NFC.
Allow initializer expressions to be emitted during SILGen when
`-experimental-lazy-typecheck` is specified by introducing a new request that
fully typechecks the init expressions of pattern binding declarations
on-demand.
There are still a few rough edges, like missing support for wrapped properties
and incomplete handling of subsumed initializers. Fixing these issues is not an
immediate priority because in the short term `-experimental-lazy-typecheck`
will always be accompanied by `-enable-library-evolution` and
`-experimental-skip-non-exportable-decls`. This means that only the
initializers of properties on `@frozen` types will need to be emitted and
property wrappers are not yet fully supported on properties belonging to
`@frozen` types.
Resolves rdar://117448868
Introduce a request that computes the unique underlying type substitution of an
opaque type declaration. This ensures that the type substitution is available
on-demand when generating SIL in lazy typechecking mode.
Resolves rdar://117439760
swiftc mis-compiles package declarations today because it reports the effective access level of package declarations as less than public. There are a bunch of places in the optimizer that are checking the effective access level against an upper bound of public, so a lot of code winds up internalized or optimized as though it were internal when it definitely is not.
Fixes rdar://118081829
