When loading the named members for a given name, we want to load all
of the members with that base name... not only the ones that match the
full name, because the lookup table is indexed by base name and
filtering too early drops candidates.
Fixes rdar://problem/36085994.
Inline bitfields are a common design pattern in LLVM and derived
projects, but the associated boilerplate can be demotivating and
brittle. This new header makes it easier to define and use inline
bitfields in Swift.
This also reorders some fields for better code generation.
The empty sentinel in the lookup table caused recursion-breaking to bottom
out in slightly different order than the old eager code, making certain
order-sensitive tests fail.
The empty sentinel in the lookup table caused recursion-breaking to bottom
out in slightly different order than the old eager code, making certain
order-sensitive tests fail.
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
This commit changes the 'Accessibility' enum to be named 'AccessLevel'.
Some types and members are synthesized by derived protocol conformances
(e.g. the CodingKeys member type or init(from:)/encode(to:) members
from Decodable/Encodable conformance) — however, they are not visible
in AST lookup if they have not been synthesized.
Exposes a LazyResolver callback for performing member synthesis where
relevant during qualified lookups to synthesize these members on demand
when needed.
Restore the old Swift 3 behavior for source compatibility reasons:
- Unqualified lookup finds static properties (but not static methods)
first, then global members.
- Qualified lookup into 'self' is still supported.
There's no change in Swift 4 mode, where the newer more correct
behavior is enabled.
Fixes <rdar://problem/32570766>.
With the introduction of special decl names, `Identifier getName()` on
`ValueDecl` will be removed and pushed down to nominal declarations
whose name is guaranteed not to be special. Prepare for this by calling
to `DeclBaseName getBaseName()` instead where appropriate.
This changes `getBaseName()` on `DeclName` to return a `DeclBaseName`
instead of an `Identifier`. All places that will continue to be
expecting an `Identifier` are changed to call `getBaseIdentifier` which
will later assert that the `DeclName` is actually backed by an
identifier and not a special name.
For transitional purposes, a conversion operator from `DeclBaseName` to
`Identifier` has been added that will be removed again once migration
to DeclBaseName has been completed in other parts of the compiler.
Unify approach to printing declaration names
Printing a declaration's name using `<<` and `getBaseName()` is be
independent of the return type of `getBaseName()` which will change in
the future from `Identifier` to `DeclBaseName`
Allow instance properties and methods to be referenced from
within a lazy property initializer, with or without explicit
'self.' qualification.
The old behavior in Swift 3 was an incredible combination
of odd quirks:
- If the lazy property had an explicitly-written type, it was
possible to reference instance members from the initializer
expression by explicitly prefixing 'self.'.
- However, if the lazy property type is inferred, it would
first be type checked in the initializer context, which
has no 'self' available.
- Unqualified references to instance members did not work
at all, because name lookup thought the "location" of the
lookup was outside of the body of the getter.
- Unqualified references to static properties worked, however
unqualified references to static methods did not, and
produced a bogus diagnostic, because one part of the name
lookup code thought that initializers were "instance
context" and another thought they were "static context".
This patch improves on the old behavior with the following
fixes:
- Give PatternBindingInitializers associated with lazy
properties an implicit 'self' declaration for use by
name lookup.
- In order to allow "re-parenting" the initializer after it
has been type checked into the body of the getter, "steal"
the initializer's 'self' when buiding the getter.
- Fix up name lookup and make it aware of the implicit
'self' decl of a PatternBindingInitializer.
This improves upon an earlier fix for this issue by Doug Gregor
which only worked with ASTScope enabled; the new fix is more
general and shares logic between the two name lookup
implementations.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16888679>, <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-48>,
<https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2203>,
<https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4663>, and the countless other
dupes of this issue.
When performing a name lookup from inside of a protocol
or extension, skip directly to the source file context
when we are done visiting the protocol or extension.
Otherwise, if we have invalid code where the protocol
or extension is nested inside another type, we might
find a member whose type contains generic parameters
of the outer type; these parameters will not resolve,
since we do not model protocols or extensions nested
inside generic contexts (yet?).
This supercedes an earlier workaround for a similar
issue; the new workaround fixes more crashes.
This is needed to avoid crasher regressions with an
upcoming patch.
Replace `NameOfType foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)` with DRY version `auto foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)`.
The DRY auto version is by far the dominant form already used in the repo, so this PR merely brings the exceptional cases (redundant repetition form) in line with the dominant form (auto form).
See the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#es11-use-auto-to-avoid-redundant-repetition-of-type-names) for a general discussion on why to use `auto` to avoid redundant repetition of type names.
