* Allow CodingKey conformance to be automatically derived for enums
which have no raw type (with no associated values) and which have
a raw type of String or Int.
* Allow Encodable and Decodable conformance to be automatically derived
for classes and structs with Encodable/Decodable properties
* Add initial unit tests for verifying derived conformance
Swift's language model doesn't guarantee that type metadata will ever really be used, which makes overriding initialize() error-prone and not really any better than manually invoking an initialization function. Warn about this for Swift 3 compatibility and reject attempts to override +initialize in Swift 4.
This function had a weird, pre-ProtocolConformanceRef interface that
returned true when the type conformed to the protocol, then had a
separate indirect return value for the concrete conformance (if there
is one). Refactor this API, and the similar
TypeChecker::containsProtocol(), to produce an optional
ProtocolConformanceRef, which is far more idiomatic and easier to
use. Push ProtocolConformanceRef into a few more places. Should be NFC
For every struct type for which the frameworks provides an NSValue category for boxing and unboxing values of that type, provide an _ObjectiveCBridgeable conformance in the Swift overlay that bridges that struct to NSValue, allowing the structs to be used naturally with id-as-Any APIs and Cocoa container classes. This is mostly a matter of gyb-ing out boilerplate using `NSValue.init(bytes:objCType:)` to construct the instance, `NSValue.objCType` to check its type when casting, and `NSValue.getValue(_:)` to extract the unboxed value, though there are a number of special snowflake cases that need special accommodation:
- To maintain proper layering, CoreGraphics structs need to be bridged in the Foundation overlay.
- AVFoundation provides the NSValue boxing categories for structs owned by CoreMedia, but it does so using its own internal subclasses of NSValue, and these subclasses do not interop properly with the standard `NSValue` subclasses instantiated by Foundation. To do the right thing, we therefore have to let AVFoundation provide the bridging implementation for the CoreMedia types, and we have to use its category methods to do so.
- SceneKit provides NSValue categories to box and unbox SCNVector3, SCNVector4, and SCNMatrix4; however, the methods it provides do so in an unusual way. SCNVector3 and SCNVector4 are packaged into `CGRect`s and then the CGRect is boxed using `valueWithCGRect:`. SCNMatrix4 is copied into a CATransform3D, which is then boxed using `valueWithCATransform3D:` from CoreAnimation. To be consistent with what SceneKit does, use its category methods for these types as well, and when casting, check the type against the type encoding SceneKit uses rather than the type encoding of the expected type.
Like NSObject, CFType has primitive operations CFEqual and CFHash,
so Swift should allow those types to show up in Hashable positions
(like dictionaries). The most general way to do this was to
introduce a new protocol, _CFObject, and then have the importer
automatically make all CF types conform to it.
This did require one additional change: the == implementation that
calls through to CFEqual is in a new CoreFoundation overlay, but the
conformance is in the underlying Clang module. Therefore, operator
lookup for conformances has been changed to look in the overlay for
an imported declaration (if there is one).
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2388
What I've implemented here deviates from the current proposal text
in the following ways:
- I had to introduce a FunctionArrowPrecedence to capture the parsing
of -> in expression contexts.
- I found it convenient to continue to model the assignment property
explicitly.
- The comparison and casting operators have historically been
non-associative; I have chosen to preserve that, since I don't
think this proposal intended to change it.
- This uses the precedence group names and higherThan/lowerThan
as agreed in discussion.
- Any is made into a keyword which is always resolved into a TypeExpr,
allowing the removal of the type system code to find TheAnyType before
an unconstrained lookup.
- Types called `Any` can be declared, they are looked up as any other
identifier is
- Renaming/redefining behaviour of source loc methods on
ProtocolCompositionTypeRepr. Added a createEmptyComposition static
method too.
- Code highlighting treats Any as a type
- simplifyTypeExpr also does not rely on source to get operator name.
- Any is now handled properly in canParseType() which was causing
generic param lists containing ‘Any’ to fail
- The import objc id as Any work has been relying on getting a decl for
the Any type. I fix up the clang importer to use Context.TheAnyType
(instead of getAnyDecl()->getDeclaredType()). When importing the id
typedef, we create a typealias to Any and declare it unavaliable.
This commit defines the ‘Any’ keyword, implements parsing for composing
types with an infix ‘&’, and provides a fixit to convert ‘protocol<>’
- Updated tests & stdlib for new composition syntax
- Provide errors when compositions used in inheritance.
Any is treated as a contextual keyword. The name ‘Any’
is used emit the empty composition type. We have to
stop user declaring top level types spelled ‘Any’ too.
This reverts commit dc24c2bd34.
Turns out Chris fixed the build but when I was looking at the bots, his fix had
not been tested yet, so I thought the tree was still red and was trying to
revert to green.
A given Objective-C error enum, which is effectively an NS_ENUM that
specifies its corresponding error domain, will now be mapped to an
ErrorProtocol-conforming struct that wraps an NSError, much like
NSCocoaError does. The actual enum is mapped to a nested "Code"
enum. For example, CoreLocation's CLError becomes:
struct CLError : ErrorProtocol {
let _nsError: NSError
// ...
@objc enum Code : Int {
case ...
}
}
This implements bullet (2) in the proposed solution of SE-0112, so
that Cocoa error types are mapped into structures that maintain the
underlying NSError to allow more information to be extracted from it.
With the exception of a specific whitelist of cases where the
Foundation module defines conformances to _ObjectiveCBridgeable for
standard library types, only permit an _ObjectiveCBridgeable
conformance in the same module as the type that's conforming to the
protocol. Among other things, this prevents the optimizer from
concluding that a dynamic cast between a Swift value type and its
bridged Objective-C class type can never succeed. See
34ff1c8e6d
for the optimizer issue. As part of this, bring the whitelist in sync
with reality, now that the compiler enforces it.
If a behavior protocol requires an `initialValue` static property, satisfy the requirement using the initial value expression from the property declaration. This lets us implement `lazy` as a property behavior.
Parse 'var [behavior] x: T', and when we see it, try to instantiate the property's
implementation in terms of the given behavior. To start out, behaviors are modeled
as protocols. If the protocol follows this pattern:
```
protocol behavior {
associatedtype Value
}
extension behavior {
var value: Value { ... }
}
```
then the property is instantiated by forming a conformance to `behavior` where
`Self` is bound to the enclosing type and `Value` is bound to the property's
declared type, and invoking the accessors of the `value` implementation:
```
struct Foo {
var [behavior] foo: Int
}
/* behaves like */
extension Foo: private behavior {
@implements(behavior.Value)
private typealias `[behavior].Value` = Int
var foo: Int {
get { return value }
set { value = newValue }
}
}
```
If the protocol requires a `storage` member, and provides an `initStorage` method
to provide an initial value to the storage:
```
protocol storageBehavior {
associatedtype Value
var storage: Something<Value> { ... }
}
extension storageBehavior {
var value: Value { ... }
static func initStorage() -> Something<Value> { ... }
}
```
then a stored property of the appropriate type is instantiated to witness the
requirement, using `initStorage` to initialize:
```
struct Foo {
var [storageBehavior] foo: Int
}
/* behaves like */
extension Foo: private storageBehavior {
@implements(storageBehavior.Value)
private typealias `[storageBehavior].Value` = Int
@implements(storageBehavior.storage)
private var `[storageBehavior].storage`: Something<Int> = initStorage()
var foo: Int {
get { return value }
set { value = newValue }
}
}
```
In either case, the `value` and `storage` properties should support any combination
of get-only/settable and mutating/nonmutating modifiers. The instantiated property
follows the settability and mutating-ness of the `value` implementation. The
protocol can also impose requirements on the `Self` and `Value` types.
Bells and whistles such as initializer expressions, accessors,
out-of-line initialization, etc. are not implemented. Additionally, behaviors
that instantiate storage are currently only supported on instance properties.
This also hasn't been tested past sema yet; SIL and IRGen will likely expose
additional issues.
Most of this is in updating the standard library, SDK overlays, and
piles of test cases to use the new names. No surprises here, although
this shows us some potential heuristic tweaks.
There is one substantive compiler change that needs to be factored out
involving synthesizing calls to copyWithZone()/copy(zone:). Aside from
that, there are four failing tests:
Swift :: ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_test.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/archiving_generic_swift_class.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/objc_currying.swift
due to two independent remaining compiler bugs:
* We're not getting partial ordering between NSCoder's
encode(AnyObject, forKey: String) and NSKeyedArchiver's version of
that method, and
* Dynamic lookup (into AnyObject) doesn't know how to find the new
names. We need the Swift name lookup tables enabled to address this.
This allows us to start code-completing infix operators in postfix
expressions. As a first step, this patch only handles completing
against the immediate LHS (so for example 1 == 1 <here> doesn't suggest
boolean operators yet).
The next step is to feed the leading sequence expression from the parser
in so we can consider how the operator being completed fits into the
whole sequence expression.
For rdar://problem/22460167
Swift SVN r32465
