I reversed this loop's direction over the instruction list and forgot to change
the order of erasing an instruction with respect to advancing the iterator.
Thankfully ASAN is far smarter than I.
Converting between forward/reverse iterators makes the loop unreadable.
Add an iterator return value to BasicBlock::erase(SILInstruction*).
I am going to run it very early and use it to ensure that extra copies due to my
refactoring of SILGenPattern do not cause COW copies to be introduced.
For now, it does a very simple optimization, namely, it eliminates a copy_value,
with only a destroy_value user on a guaranteed parameter.
It is now disabled behind a flag.
This commit changes how inline information is stored in SILDebugScope
from a tree to a linear chain of inlined call sites (similar to what
LLVM is using). This makes creating inlined SILDebugScopes slightly
more expensive, but makes lowering SILDebugScopes into LLVM metadata
much faster because entire inlined-at chains can now be cached. This
means that SIL is no longer preserve the inlining history (i.e., ((a
was inlined into b) was inlined into c) is represented the same as (a
was inlined into (b was inlined into c)), but this information was not
used by anyone.
On my late 2012 i7 iMac, this saves about 4 seconds when compiling the
RelWithDebInfo x86_64 swift standard library — or 40% of IRGen time.
rdar://problem/28311051
Previously we would drop all serialized SIL from partial swiftmodule
files generated while compiling source in non-WMO mode; all that was
missing was linking it in.
This adds a frontend flag, and a test; driver change is coming up
next.
Progress on <rdar://problem/18913977>.
LLVM r299341 removed the llvm::integerPart typedef and replaced it
with llvm::APInt::WordType. The integerPartWidth constant was replaced
by llvm::APInt::APINT_BITS_PER_WORD.
The new API is broken. Popping a generic context frees all
dependent type lowerings, so this function returns a pointer
to freed memory.
This reverts commit 24dfae0716.
This generalizes a hack where re-abstraction thunks become fragile on contact
with fragile functions.
The old policy was:
- [fragile] functions always serialized
- [reabstraction_thunk] transitively referenced from fragile always serialized
The new policy is:
- [serialized] functions always serialized
- [serializable] functions transitively referenced from serialized functions
are always serialized
- Most kinds of thunks can now be [serializable], allowing them to be shared
between serialized and non-serialized code without any issues, as long as the
body of the thunk is sufficiently "simple" (doesn't reference private
symbols or performs direct access to resilient types)
Also, add a third [serializable] state for functions whose bodies we
*can* serialize, but only do so if they're referenced from another
serialized function.
This will be used for bodies synthesized for imported definitions,
such as init(rawValue:), etc, and various thunks, but for now this
change is NFC.
This commit does a few things:
1. It uses SwitchEnumBuilder so we are not re-inventing any wheels.
2. Instead of hacking around not putting in a destroy for .None on the fail
pass, just *do the right thing* and recognize that we have a binary case enum
and in such a case, just emit code for the other case rather than use a default
case (meaning no cleanup on .none).
rdar://31145255
There's some new bug where IRGen can call requiresNewVTableEntry()
with a generic context pushed, which then goes to lower a function
type and can try to push another context, causing an assert.
I don't have a test case handy and I want to rip out the push/pop
crap soon anyway, so kick the can down the road, borrow some more
money at 20% interest and party hard with a stack.
Take a seat and pour yourself a beer because this is
going to get pretty intense.
Recall that class methods that return 'Self', have a
'self' type of @dynamic_self X or @dynamic_self X.Type,
for some class X, based on if the method is an instance
method or a static method.
The instance type of a metatype is not lowered, and we
preserve DynamicSelfType there. This is required for
correct behavior with the SIL optimizer.
For example if you specialize a function that contains a
'metatype $((T) -> Int, T).Type' SIL instruction or
some other metatype of a structural type containing a
generic parameter, we might end up with something like
'metatype $((@dynamic_self X) -> Int, X).Type'
after substitution, for some class 'X'. Note that the
second occurrence of 'X', is in "lowered position" so
the @dynamic_self did, indeed, get stripped away.
So while *values* of @dynamic_self type don't need to
carry the fact that they're @dynamic_self at the SIL
level, because Sema has inserted all the right casts.
Metatypes do though, because when lowering the 'metatype'
instruction, IRGen has to know to emit the type metadata
from the method's 'self' parameter, and not the static
metadata for the exact class type.
Essentially, 'metatype @dynamic_self X.Type' is
the same as 'value_metatype %self : X.Type', except that
the @dynamic_self type can appear inside other structural
types also, which is something we cannot write in the
AST.
This is all well and good, but when lowering a
SILFunctionType we erase @dynamic_self from the 'self'
parameter type because when you *call* such a function
from another function, you are not necessarily calling
it on your own 'self' value. And if you are, Sema
already emitted the right unchecked downcast there to
turn the result into the right type.
The problem is that the type of an argument (the value
"inside" the function) used to always be identical to
the type of the parameter (the type from "outside" the
function, in the SILFunctionType). Of course this
assumption is no longer correct for static methods,
where the 'self' argument should really have type
@dynamic_self X.Type, not X.Type.
A further complication is closure captures, whose types
can also contain @dynamic_self inside metatypes in other
structural types. We used to erase @dynamic_self from
these.
Both of these are wrong, because if you call a generic
function <T> (T.Type) -> () with a T := @dynamic_self X
substitution (recall that substitutions are written in
terms of AST types and not lowered types) and pass in
the 'self' argument, we would pass in a value of type
X.Type and not @dynamic_self X.Type.
There were similar issues with captures, with
additional complications from nested closures.
Fix all this by having SILGenProlog emit a downcast
to turn the X.Type argument into a value of type
@dynamic_self X.Type, and tweak capture lowering to
not erase @dynamic_self from capture types.
This fixes several cases that used to fail with
asserts in SILGenApply or the SIL verifier, in particular
the example outlined in <rdar://problem/31226650>,
where we would crash when calling a protocol extension
method from a static class method (oops!).
If you got this far and still follow along,
congratulations, you now know more about DynamicSelfType
than I do.
This replaces SILDeclRef::getBaseOverriddenVTableEntry(). It lives
in the TypeConverter because it needs to use type lowering information
to determine if the method requires a new vtable entry or not.
Simply mangling the derived method is no longer sufficient. Now also
mangle the base method, so that eventually we handle this sort of
scenario:
class Base {
// introduces: Base.method
func method(_: Int, _: Int) {}
}
class First : Base {
// overrides: Base.method
// introduces: First.method
override func method(_: Int?, _: Int) {}
}
class Second : First {
// overrides: Base.method, First.method
// introduces: Second.method
override func method(_: Int?, _: Int?) {}
}
Here, the override of Base.method by Second.method and the
override of First.method by Second.method require distinct
manglings even though the derived method (Second.method) is
the same in both cases.
Note that while the new mangling is longer, vtable thunks are
always emitted with private linkage, so with the exception of
the standard library which is built with -sil-serialize-all
they will not affect the size of dylibs.
The standard library itself has very few classes so it doesn't
matter there either.
This patch doesn't actually add any support to introduce new
vtable entries for methods that override; this is coming up
next.
