The protocol conformance checker verifies that all of the requirements
in the protocol's requirement signature are fulfilled. Save the
conformances from that check into the NormalProtocolConformance,
because this is the record of how that concrete type satisfies the
protocol requirements.
Compute, deserialize, and verify this information, but don't use it
for anything just yet. We'll use this to eliminate the "inherited
protocol map" and possibility some redundant type-witness
information.
In order to lower replacement types that appear in lowered
position, we need to know the generic signature of the
original type.
Allow this to be passed in explicitly, but fall back to
the push/pop generic context if not present.
This is a first step toward eliminating the push/pop of
the generic context.
Fixes <rdar://problem/29711782>.
This lets you match `case .foo` when `foo` resolves to any static member, instead of only a `case`, albeit without the exhaustiveness checking and subpattern capabilities of proper cases. While we're here, adjust the type system we set up for unresolved patterns embedded in expressions so that we give better signal in the error messages too.
Centralize the checking of a superclass constraint against a
same-type-to-concrete constraint. Additionally, produce a warning if
the superclass constraint is satisfied but is made redundant by an
existing same-type constraint.
Use the same infrastructure we have for same-type-to-concrete
constraints to check superclass constraints. Specifically,
* Track all superclass constraints; never "update" a requirement source
* Remove self-derived superclass constraints
* Pick the best superclass constraint within each connected component
of an equivalence class and use that for requirement generation.
* Diagnose conflicting superclass requirements during finalization
* Diagnose redundant superclass requirements (during finalization)
This will make it easier to incrementally implement syntax nodes,
while allowing us to embed nodes that we do know about inside ones
that we don't.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4062
Replace an existing flag for cross-references to member types (that
wasn't getting much use) with one consistent with how we lookup
values. This fixes the case where someone actually has a useful type
as a member of a protocol extension, and that type gets referenced in
another module; Dispatch does exactly this.
Because you can currently only define typealiases in protocol
extensions, not new types, there's always a workaround for someone
hitting this issue: just use the underlying type.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4076
Introduce an operation on RequirementSource to determine whether a
constraint with such a source, when it lands on a given potential
archetype, is "self-derived": e.g., the final constraint is derived
from the original constraint. Remove such constraints from the system
during finalization, because otherwise they would make the original
constraint redundant.
Fixes rdar://problem/30478915, although we still need to apply this
same logic to other kinds of constraints in the system.
Use TrailingObjects to help us efficiently store the root potential
archetype within requirement sources, so we can reconstruct the
complete path from the point where a requirement was created to the
potential archetype it affects.
The test changes are because we are now dumping the root potential
archetype as part of -debug-generic-signatures.
Whenever we create a (root) requirement source, associate it with the
potential archetype on which the requirement is written. This lets us
follow a requirement source from the (stated or implied) requirement on
the root potential archetype to the effective requirement on the
resulting potential archetype.
Introduce FloatingRequirementSource for the cases where we need to
state what the root source is, but don't yet have a potential
archetype to attach it to. These get internally resolved to
RequirementSources as soon as possible.
Also take the opportunity to simplify the code and tighten the assertions.
The commit does not contain a test-case, because it is kind of difficult to provide a reduced one.
The idea of the fix stems from @slavapestov. I just provided minor improvements and tested it on a very big test-case to see that it fixes the bug.
Use this in ProtocolDecl::requiresClassSlow(), and hope its presence
discourages more potentially-infinitely-recursive walks of the
inherited-protocols lists.
Also includes for its substructure:
- function-call-argument
- function-call-argument-list
- symbolic-reference-expression (for the call target)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4044
