At some point, pass definitions were heavily macro-ized. Pass
descriptive names were added in two places. This is not only redundant
but a source of confusion. You could waste a lot of time grepping for
the wrong string. I removed all the getName() overrides which, at
around 90 passes, was a fairly significant amount of code bloat.
Any pass that we want to be able to invoke by name from a tool
(sil-opt) or pipeline plan *should* have unique type name, enum value,
commend-line string, and name string. I removed a comment about the
various inliner passes that contradicted that.
Side note: We should be consistent with the policy that a pass is
identified by its type. We have a couple passes, LICM and CSE, which
currently violate that convention.
I improved all of the pass names so they are minimal but fully descriptive.
The PASS macros contained wordy, unhelpful descriptions, which served
no functional purpose. Those descriptions are permanently preseved in
git history. If anyone thinks they contain useful information, then
they should be added to the *definition* of the pass (where passes are
actually described).
Long-winded pass comments have no place in Passes.def. The purpose of
those macros is to associate a unique type name, enum value,
command-line-option name, and pretty name with each pass for tooling
purposes. Any one of those entities needs to be sufficient for looking
up the others. That's not where anyone should look read a description
of the pass.
As we've done with layout requirements, introduce a new entry point
(addTypeRequirement) that handles unresolved type requirements of the
form `T: U`, resolves the types, and then can
1. Diagnose any immediate problems with the types,
2. Delay the type requirement if one of the types cannot be resolved,
or
3. Break it into one or more "direct" requirements.
This allows us to clean up and centralize a bunch of checking that was
scattered/duplicated across the GSB and type checker.
When we resolve() a type that is being used in a constraint, allow
that resolution to fail. If it does fail, then record the constraint
we were trying to address (via a stub that, currently, just drops it)
and continue on. NFC for now; this is intended to allow us to limit
the explosion of types in recursive systems.
I am going to run it very early and use it to ensure that extra copies due to my
refactoring of SILGenPattern do not cause COW copies to be introduced.
For now, it does a very simple optimization, namely, it eliminates a copy_value,
with only a destroy_value user on a guaranteed parameter.
It is now disabled behind a flag.
