These changes caused a number of issues:
1. No debug info is emitted when a release-debug info compiler is built.
2. OS X deployment target specification is broken.
3. Swift options were broken without any attempt any recreating that
functionality. The specific option in question is --force-optimized-typechecker.
Such refactorings should be done in a fashion that does not break existing
users and use cases.
This reverts commit e6ce2ff388.
This reverts commit e8645f3750.
This reverts commit 89b038ea7e.
This reverts commit 497cac64d9.
This reverts commit 953ad094da.
This reverts commit e096d1c033.
rdar://30549345
This patch splits add_swift_library into two functions one which handles
the simple case of adding a library that is part of the compiler being
built and the second handling the more complicated case of "target"
libraries, which may need to build for one or more targets.
The new add_swift_library is built using llvm_add_library, which re-uses
LLVM's CMake modules. In adapting to use LLVM's modules some of
add_swift_library's named parameters have been removed and
LINK_LIBRARIES has changed to LINK_LIBS, and LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
changed to LINK_COMPONENTS.
This patch also cleans up libswiftBasic's handling of UUID library and
headers, and how it interfaces with gyb sources.
add_swift_library also no longer has the FILE_DEPENDS parameter, which
doesn't matter because llvm_add_library's DEPENDS parameter has the same
behavior.
Changes:
* Terminate all namespaces with the correct closing comment.
* Make sure argument names in comments match the corresponding parameter name.
* Remove redundant get() calls on smart pointers.
* Prefer using "override" or "final" instead of "virtual". Remove "virtual" where appropriate.
As a first step to allowing the build script to build *only*
static library versions of the stdlib, change `add_swift_library`
such that callers must pass in `SHARED`, `STATIC`, or `OBJECT_LIBRARY`.
Ideally, only these flags would be used to determine whether to
build shared, static, or object libraries, but that is not currently
the case -- `add_swift_library` also checks whether the library
`IS_STDLIB` before performing certain additional actions. This will be
cleaned up in a future commit.
"Sanitizer Coverage" with a new flag ``-sanitize-coverage=``. This
flag is analogous to Clang's ``-fsanitize-coverage=``.
This instrumentation currently requires ASan or TSan to be enabled
because the module pass created by ``createSanitizerCoverageModulePass()``
inserts calls into functions found in compiler-rt's "sanitizer_common".
"sanitizer_common" is not shipped as an individual library but instead
exists in several of the sanitizer runtime libraries so we have to
link with one of them to avoid linking errors.
The rationale between adding this feature is to allow experimentation
with libFuzzer which currently relies on "Sanitizer Coverage"
instrumentation.
The options themselves are now in swift::options (from swift::driver::options).
The soon-to-be-renamed createDriverOptTable() is now directly in the swift namespace.
Swift SVN r19825
This allows swiftFrontend to drop its dependency on swiftDriver, and could
someday allow us to move the integrated frontend's option parsing out of
swiftFrontend (which would allow other tools which use swiftFrontend to
exclude the option table entirely).
Swift SVN r19824
