Revert "Fix complete_decl_attribute test for @fixed_layout"
Revert "Sema: non-@objc private stored properties do not need accessors"
Revert "Sema: Access stored properties of resilient structs through accessors"
Revert "Strawman @fixed_layout attribute and -{enable,disable}-resilience flags"
This reverts commit c91c6a789e.
This reverts commit 693d3d339f.
This reverts commit 085f88f616.
This reverts commit 5d99dc9bb8.
A fixed layout type is one about which the compiler is allowed to
make certain assumptions across resilience domains. The assumptions
will be documented elsewhere, but for the purposes of this patch
series, they will include:
- the size of the type
- offsets of stored properties
- whether accessed properties are stored or computed
When -enable-resilience is passed to the frontend, all types become
resilient unless annotated with the @fixed_layout attribute.
So far, the @fixed_layout attribute only comes into play in SIL type
lowering of structs and enums, which now become address-only unless
they are @fixed_layout. For now, @fixed_layout is also allowed on
classes, but has no effect. In the future, support for less resilient
type lowering within a single resilience domain will be added, with
appropriate loads and stores in function prologs and epilogs.
Resilience is not enabled by default, which gives all types fixed
layout and matches the behavior of the compiler today. Since
we do not want the -enable-resilience flag to change the behavior
of existing compiled modules, only the currently-compiling module,
Sema adds the @fixed_layout flag to all declarations when the flag
is off. To reduce the size of .swiftmodule files, this could become
a flag on the module itself in the future.
The reasoning behind this is that the usual case is building
applications and private frameworks, where there is no need to make
anything resilient.
For the standard library, we can start out with resilience disabled,
while perfoming an audit adding @fixed_layout annotations in the
right places. Once the implementation is robust enough we can then
build the standard library with resilience enabled.
This will be used in call graph construction so that we can model calls
to deinits that are potentially called as a result of executing
instructions that can end up releasing memory.
Previously all uses of this instruction used the single element ArrayRef
constructor. The single element ArrayRef constructor does not require any extra
memory. In the case where one does need extra memory, one would need to allocate
the memory for the init_existential_metatype and pass it in. This commit changes
init_existential_metatype to tail allocate the memory for the conformance
pointers and memcpy them in from the array.
Discovered when a SmallVector of protocol conformances resulted in memory
corruption and frustration =--(.
rdar://22302277
Swift SVN r31276
If the compiler can prove that a throwing function actually does not throw it can
replace a try_apply with an "apply [nothrow]". Such an apply_inst calls a function
with an error result but does not have the overhead of checking for the error case.
Currently this flag is not set, yet.
Swift SVN r31151
Without this if you called either of these methods when you did not have True or
False operands, memory that is not owned by the CondBranchInst would be touched.
Now we just check if we don't have the relevant arguments and early return an
empty array of the relevant type.
Swift SVN r26782
threaded into IRGen; tests to follow when that's done.
I made a preliminary effort to make the inliner do the
right thing with try_apply, but otherwise tried to avoid
touching the optimizer any more than was required by the
removal of ApplyInstBase.
Swift SVN r26747
This includes:
1. Extract instructions which extracts a trivial part of an aggregate that has
one RCIdentity.
2. Instructions which take a pointer out of ARC's control by converting it to a
trivial type. This is safe to do since we can assume that the object that is
convered is alive when the conversion happens. So assuming that we can
conservatively find all RC users, we will have at least one RC user that
post dominates the use (since otherwise we would be touching a dangling
pointer). We leave it to the user of the pass to determine what is safe to do
with this information. Potentially in the future it might make sense to return
this information as well so that a user can use that information directly.
rdar://20305817
Swift SVN r26583
The new base class ApplyInstBase contains APIs that are common for ApplyInst and PartialApplyInst. It allows such optimization passes like generic specializer to treat both instructions in the same way whenever it is possible. Before this change, one had to duplicate and adjust a lot of implementation code in such passes, because ApplyInst and PartialApplyInst were not related to each other in any form.
The existing clients of both classes can continue using the usual APIs. No changes are required. Only new clients, which want to treat ApplyInst and PartialApplyInst in a uniform way, may do so. One of such new clients is the generic specializer, whose adjusted implementation will be submitted in the following commit.
Swift SVN r26581
We no longer need or use it since we can always refer to the same bit on
the applied function when deciding whether to inline during mandatory
inlining.
Resolves rdar://problem/19478366.
Swift SVN r26534
Currently a no-op, but effective access for entities within the current
module will soon need to take testability into account. This declaration:
internal func foo() {}
has a formal access of 'internal', but an effective access of 'public' if
we're in a testable mode.
Part of rdar://problem/17732115 (testability)
Swift SVN r26472
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
This is just good to do and hopefully will help prevent people from forgetting
to check in the future by annotating the API explicitly as returning a
potentially nullptr.
Swift SVN r25364
memory layout and add a SelectInst API that allows for one to access select inst
operands when one does not care about what the cases actually are.
Previously select_enum, select_enum_addr had the following memory layout:
[operands], [cases]
In constrast, select_value had the following layout:
[operand1, case1, operand2, case 2, ...]
The layout for select_value makes it impossible to just visit operands in a
generic way via a higher level API. This is an important operation for many
analyses such as AA on select insts.
This commit does the following:
1. Adds a new abstract parent class for all select instructions called
SelectInst.
2. Adds a new templated implementation parent class that inherits from
SelectInst called SelectInstBase. This handles the complete implementation of
select for all types by templating on CaseTy.
3. Changes SelectEnumAddrInst, SelectEnumInst, SelectValueInst to be thin
classes that inherit from the appropriately specialized SelectInstBase.
I left in SelectEnumInstBase for now as a subclass of SelectInstBase and parent
class of SelectEnum{,Addr}Inst since it provides specific enum APIs that are
used all over the compiler. All of these methods have equivalent methods on
SelectInstBase. I just want to leave them for a later commit so that this commit
stays small.
Swift SVN r24159
