Change emitApplyOfLibraryIntrinsic() to take a SubstitutionMap,
and use the correct abstractions to build the map.
This gets rid of the last remaining uses of gatherAllSubstitutions()
in SIL.
ASTContext::getSpecializedConformance() already copies the
substitutions, so remove some AllocateCopy() calls.
Also, add a new overload taking a SubstitutionMap instead.
This allows removing some gatherAllSubstitutions() calls,
which have an allocation inside them.
Finally, remove the now-unused ModuleDecl parameter from
ProtocolConformance::subst() and make it public.
...and IRGen it into a call to __tsan_write1 in compiler-rt. This is
preparatory work for a later patch that will add an experimental
option to treat Swift inout accesses as TSan writes.
This is a closure based API for creating switches that obey ownership
convensions. The way you use it with objects is as follows:
SwitchEnumBuilder S(...);
S.addCase(Decl, Block, [](ManagedValue Arg) -> void {
...
});
S.addCase(Decl, Block, [](ManagedValue Arg) -> void {
...
});
S.addDefaultCase(Block, [](ManagedValue Arg) -> void {
...
});
std::move(S).emit();
What is important is that it sets up the switch_enum destination blocks with the
proper cleanups for code emitted into the destination block and also provides
the default error with the passed in value with the appropriate cleanups.
It does not handle exits from the switch_enum on purpose since diamond
switch_enum APIs form a subset of APIs. It also expects the closure to create
terminators if appropriate.
In the switch_enum_addr case you have to do a bit more work, but it is still a
nicer API than doing it by hand as we do today.
rdar://29791263
to correctly handle generalized protocol requirements.
The major missing pieces here are that the conformance search
algorithms in both the AST (type substitution) and IRGen
(witness table reference emission) need to be rewritten to
back-track requirement sources, and the AST needs to actually
represent this stuff in NormalProtocolConformances instead
of just doing ???.
The new generality isn't tested yet; I'm looking into that,
but I wanted to get the abstractions in place first.
The issue here is that:
1. Self is passed into deallocating deinits at +1.
2. Destroying deinits take in self as a +0 value that is then returned at +1.
This means that the lifetime of self can not be modeled statically in a
deallocating deinit without analyzing the body of the destroying deinit
(something that violates semantic sil). Thus we add an artifical destroy of
self before the actual destroy of self so that the verifier can understand
that self is being properly balanced.
rdar://29791263
Previously, we would put a destroy_value directly on the value that we tried to
cast. Since checked_cast_br is consuming, this would cause the destroy_value on
the failure path to be flagged as a double consume.
This commit causes SILGen to emit the value consumed by checked_cast_br as an
@owned argument to the failure BB, allowing semantic arc rules to be respected.
As an additional benefit, I also upgraded the ownership_model_eliminator test to
use semantic sil verification.
One issue that did come up though is that I was unable to use the new code in
all locations in the compiler. Specifically, there is one location in
SILGenPattern that uses argument unforwarding. I am going to need to undo
argument unforwarding in SILGenPattern in order to completely eliminate the old
code path.
Whenever we create a (root) requirement source, associate it with the
potential archetype on which the requirement is written. This lets us
follow a requirement source from the (stated or implied) requirement on
the root potential archetype to the effective requirement on the
resulting potential archetype.
Introduce FloatingRequirementSource for the cases where we need to
state what the root source is, but don't yet have a potential
archetype to attach it to. These get internally resolved to
RequirementSources as soon as possible.
First, use the correct generic environment to compute the substituted
storage type. Substitutions derived from 'self' are not enough,
because we also want the archetypes of the generic subscript's
innermost generic parameters.
Also, use the method and witness_method calling conventions for the
materializeForSet callback, depending on if we have a protocol
witness or concrete implementation.
Since the materializeForSet callback is called with a more
abstract type at the call site than the actual function type
of the callback, we used to rely on these two SIL types being
ABI compatible:
@convention(thin) <Self : P, T, U) (..., Self.Type) -> ()
@convention(thin) <T, U> (..., Foo<T, U>.Type) -> ()
The IRGen lowering is roughly the following -- the call site
passes two unused parameters, but that's fine:
(..., Self.Type*, Self.Type*, Self.P*)
(..., Foo<T, U>.Type*)
However if the callback has its own generic parameters because
the subscript is generic, we might have SIL types like so,
@convention(thin) <Self : P, T, U, V) (..., Self.Type) -> ()
@convention(thin) <T, U, V> (..., Foo<T, U>.Type) -> ()
And the IRGen lowering is the following:
(..., Self.Type*, Self.Type*, Self.P*, V.Type*)
(..., Foo<T, U>.Type*, V.Type*)
The parameters no longer line up, because the caller still passes
the two discarded arguments, and type metadata for V cannot be
derived from the Self metadata so must be passed separately.
The witness_method calling convention is designed to solve this
problem; it puts the Self metadata and protocol conformance last,
so if you have these SIL types:
@convention(witness_method) <Self : P, T, U, V) (..., swiftself Self.Type) -> ()
@convention(witness_method) <T, U, V> (..., swiftself Foo<T, U>.Type) -> ()
The IRGen lowering is the following:
(..., Self.Type*, V.Type*, Self.Type*, Self.P*)
(..., Foo<T, U>.Type*, V.Type*, Self.Type*, unused i8*)
However, the problem is now that witness_method and thin functions
are not ABI compatible, because thin functions don't have a
distinguished 'self', which is passed differently in LLVM's swiftcc
calling convention:
@convention(witness_method) <Self : P, T, U, V) (..., Self.Type) -> ()
@convention(thin) <T, U, V> (..., Foo<T, U>.Type) -> ()
So instead of using 'thin' representation for the concrete callback
case, use 'method', which is essentially the same as 'thin' except if
the last parameter is pointer-size, it is passed as the 'self' value.
This makes everything work out.
We can get the generic signature from the generic environment
now, and for generic subscript protocol witnesses, using the
signature of the conformance is wrong; it won't have the
generic parameters of the subscript itself.
Also, emit the materializeForSet callback in the right place in
SILModule. Instead of adding it at the end, put it before the
materializeForSet itself. This makes tests a bit easier to write.
