This is useful for optimizations (like AllocBoxToStack) which create (de-)alloc_stack instructions.
They can just insert the new instructions anywhere without worrying about nesting and correct the nesting afterwards.
Following classes provide symbol mangling for specific purposes:
*) Mangler: the base mangler class, just providing some basic utilities
*) ASTMangler: for mangling AST declarations
*) SpecializationMangler: to be used in the optimizer for mangling specialized function names
*) IRGenMangler: mangling all kind of symbols in IRGen
All those classes are not used yet, so it’s basically a NFC.
Another change is that some demangler node types are added (either because they were missing or the new demangler needs them).
Those new nodes also need to be handled in the old demangler, but this should also be a NFC as those nodes are not created by the old demangler.
My plan is to keep the old and new mangling implementation in parallel for some time. After that we can remove the old mangler.
Currently the new implementation is scoped in the NewMangling namespace. This namespace should be renamed after the old mangler is removed.
- Move the common performance inliner functionality into PerformanceInlinerUtils.cpp.
- Move the functionality specific to non-generic inlining into NonGenericPerformanceInliner.cpp
- Temporarily disable the inlining of generics. It will be enabled in the subsequent commit.
This split the function signature module pass into 2 functin passes.
By doing so, this allows us to rewrite to using the FSO-optimized
function prior to attempting inlining, but allow us to do a substantial
amount of optimization on the current function before attempting to do
FSO on that function.
And also helps us to move to a model which module pass is NOT used unless
necesary.
I do not see regression nor improvement for on the performance test suite.
functionsignopts.sil and functionsignopt_sroa.sil are modified because the
mangler now takes into account of information in the projection tree.
(libraries now)
It has been generally agreed that we need to do this reorg, and now
seems like the perfect time. Some major pass reorganization is in the
works.
This does not have to be the final word on the matter. The consensus
among those working on the code is that it's much better than what we
had and a better starting point for future bike shedding.
Note that the previous organization was designed to allow separate
analysis and optimization libraries. It turns out this is an
artificial distinction and not an important goal.
