There was a ton of complicated logic here to work around
two problems:
- Same-type constraints were not represented properly in
RequirementReprs, requiring us to store them in strong form
and parse them out when printing type interfaces.
- The TypeBase::getAllGenericArgs() method did not do the
right thing for members of protocols and protocol extensions,
and so instead of simple calls to Type::subst(), we had
an elaborate 'ArchetypeTransformer' abstraction repeated
in two places.
Rewrite this code to use GenericSignatures and
GenericFunctionType instead of old-school GenericParamLists
and PolymorphicFunctionType.
This changes the code completion and AST printer output
slightly. A few of the changes are actually fixes for cases
where the old code didn't handle substitutions properly.
A few others are subjective, for example a generic parameter
list of the form <T : Proto> now prints as <T where T : Proto>.
We can add heuristics to make the output whatever we want
here; the important thing is that now we're using modern
abstractions.
What I've implemented here deviates from the current proposal text
in the following ways:
- I had to introduce a FunctionArrowPrecedence to capture the parsing
of -> in expression contexts.
- I found it convenient to continue to model the assignment property
explicitly.
- The comparison and casting operators have historically been
non-associative; I have chosen to preserve that, since I don't
think this proposal intended to change it.
- This uses the precedence group names and higherThan/lowerThan
as agreed in discussion.
This allows us to start code-completing postfix operators (generally !,
++, and --), which lays some of the groundwork for completing the much
more interesting infix operators.
These only show up when in postfix position
x<here>
For rdar://problem/22460167
Swift SVN r32355
Global variables from the same source file are more like locals when
writing top-level code, particularly in Playgrounds. Other declarations
(types, global functions, etc.) are unaffected.
rdar://problem/22329905
Swift SVN r31992
To answer "did the user specify this, or is it implicit", stick a couple
of is-implicit bits in InfixOperatorDecl, and thread them through
serializaton/deserialization.
Swift SVN r20067
modifiers and with the func implementations of the operators. This resolves the rest of:
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
Swift SVN r19931
