Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Slava Pestov
8fe8b89b0f SIL: Terminology change: [fragile] => [serialized]
Also, add a third [serializable] state for functions whose bodies we
*can* serialize, but only do so if they're referenced from another
serialized function.

This will be used for bodies synthesized for imported definitions,
such as init(rawValue:), etc, and various thunks, but for now this
change is NFC.
2017-03-29 16:47:28 -07:00
John McCall
e249fd680e Destructure result types in SIL function types.
Similarly to how we've always handled parameter types, we
now recursively expand tuples in result types and separately
determine a result convention for each result.

The most important code-generation change here is that
indirect results are now returned separately from each
other and from any direct results.  It is generally far
better, when receiving an indirect result, to receive it
as an independent result; the caller is much more likely
to be able to directly receive the result in the address
they want to initialize, rather than having to receive it
in temporary memory and then copy parts of it into the
target.

The most important conceptual change here that clients and
producers of SIL must be aware of is the new distinction
between a SILFunctionType's *parameters* and its *argument
list*.  The former is just the formal parameters, derived
purely from the parameter types of the original function;
indirect results are no longer in this list.  The latter
includes the indirect result arguments; as always, all
the indirect results strictly precede the parameters.
Apply instructions and entry block arguments follow the
argument list, not the parameter list.

A relatively minor change is that there can now be multiple
direct results, each with its own result convention.
This is a minor change because I've chosen to leave
return instructions as taking a single operand and
apply instructions as producing a single result; when
the type describes multiple results, they are implicitly
bound up in a tuple.  It might make sense to split these
up and allow e.g. return instructions to take a list
of operands; however, it's not clear what to do on the
caller side, and this would be a major change that can
be separated out from this already over-large patch.

Unsurprisingly, the most invasive changes here are in
SILGen; this requires substantial reworking of both call
emission and reabstraction.  It also proved important
to switch several SILGen operations over to work with
RValue instead of ManagedValue, since otherwise they
would be forced to spuriously "implode" buffers.
2016-02-18 01:26:28 -08:00
Joe Groff
fbd2e4d872 Rename @asmname to @_silgen_name.
This reflects the fact that the attribute's only for compiler-internal use, and isn't really equivalent to C's asm attribute, since it doesn't change the calling convention to be C-compatible.
2015-11-17 14:13:48 -08:00
Joe Groff
c0a2994564 AST: Start printing function types with @convention instead of old attributes.
And update tests to match.

Swift SVN r27262
2015-04-13 22:51:34 +00:00
Jordan Rose
bfe8a27242 [serialization] Don't try to cross-reference generic params of SIL functions.
SIL functions use AST GenericParamTypeDecls, but they don't have a useful
DeclContext, so they just use the AST module associated with the current
SILModule. However, when it comes time to reserialize referenced functions
with shared_external linkage (such as closures defined in fragile public
functions), the serializer was trying to cross-reference those generic
parameters rather than reserialize them, because they aren't part of the
current source file. And because these decls aren't attached to a specific
AST DeclContext, we can't properly cross-reference them---nor should we.

This commit introduces a targeted case in the cross-reference logic to force
re-serializing these declarations. In the long run we may want to reconsider
using AST GenericParamLists for SILFunctions.

rdar://problem/18673024

Swift SVN r22800
2014-10-16 18:05:55 +00:00