Most of this is in updating the standard library, SDK overlays, and
piles of test cases to use the new names. No surprises here, although
this shows us some potential heuristic tweaks.
There is one substantive compiler change that needs to be factored out
involving synthesizing calls to copyWithZone()/copy(zone:). Aside from
that, there are four failing tests:
Swift :: ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_test.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/archiving_generic_swift_class.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/objc_currying.swift
due to two independent remaining compiler bugs:
* We're not getting partial ordering between NSCoder's
encode(AnyObject, forKey: String) and NSKeyedArchiver's version of
that method, and
* Dynamic lookup (into AnyObject) doesn't know how to find the new
names. We need the Swift name lookup tables enabled to address this.
Per discussion, there are certain times where our APIs really want you to use
the performSelector family of methods (e.g. when the framework hands you a selector
and expects you to call it upon completion).
Although the methods still aren't type-safe, we are at least making the result
Unmanaged so that you're forced to think about whether it's +1 or +0 before you
use it, and so that the compiler doesn't accidentally try to retain a non-object
pointer.
This commit also removes the blocks on the makeObjectsPerformSelector... methods,
but Foundation plans to add NS_SWIFT_UNAVAILABLE there (see rdar://problem/21150180).
rdar://problem/21150277
Swift SVN r30044
A "super" expression may refer not only to a super instance object, but a super metatype object as well. Fixes rdar://problem/17599865.
Swift SVN r21559
