For long names this is easier to read and in most cases the omitted information can be seen in the actual SIL code.
With the option -Xllvm -sil-full-demangle the old behavior can be restored.
We were emitting the counter for falling out of a do block at the end
of the entire construct's scope, but this can cause us to miss the
increment if the insertion point isn't valid there. Move the increment
to immediately after we emit the body.
rdar://problem/22346924
Swift SVN r31356
Exception handling in an init block was hitting an assert when we
ended a coverage range inside the implicit return decl. It doesn't
actually make sense to generate coverage mappings in implicit stmts
anyway, but this is the first test case that came across that.
Swift SVN r28508
Add a counter in each catch block and one for the fallthrough out of
the entire do-catch block, and implement the logic to handle these and
throw statements in the coverage mapping.
Swift SVN r27950
