Instead of appending a character for each substitution, we now prefix the substitution with the repeat count, e.g.
AbbbbB -> A5B
The same is done for known-type substitutions, e.g.
SiSiSi -> S3i
This significantly shrinks mangled names which contain large lists of the same type, like
func foo(_ x: (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int))
rdar://problem/30707433
Keep in mind that these are approximations that will not impact correctness
since in all cases I ensured that the SIL will be the same after the
OwnershipModelEliminator has run. The cases that I was unsure of I commented
with SEMANTIC ARC TODO. Once we have the verifier any confusion that may have
occurred here will be dealt with.
rdar://28685236
This ensures that ownership is properly propagated forward through the use-def
graph.
This was the work that was stymied by issues relating to SILBuilder performing
local ARC dataflow. I ripped out that local dataflow in 6f4e2ab and added a
cheap ARC guaranteed dataflow pass that performs the same optimization.
Also in the process of doing this work, I found that there were many SILGen
tests that were either pattern matching in the wrong functions or had wrong
CHECK lines (for instance CHECK_NEXT). I fixed all of these issues and also
expanded many of the tests so that they verify ownership. The only work I left
for a future PR is that there are certain places in tests where we are using the
projection from an original value, instead of a copy. I marked those with a
message SEMANTIC ARC TODO so that they are easy to find.
rdar://28685236
Having a separate address and container value returned from alloc_stack is not really needed in SIL.
Even if they differ we have both addresses available during IRGen, because a dealloc_stack is always dominated by the corresponding alloc_stack in the same function.
Although this commit quite large, most changes are trivial. The largest non-trivial change is in IRGenSIL.
This commit is a NFC regarding the generated code. Even the generated SIL is the same (except removed #0, #1 and @local_storage).
Debug variable info may be attached to debug_value, debug_value_addr,
alloc_box, and alloc_stack instructions.
In order to write textual SIL -> SIL testcases that exercise the handling
of debug information by SIL passes, we need to make a couple of additions
to the textual SIL language. In memory, the debug information attached to
SIL instructions references information from the AST. If we want to create
debug info from parsing a textual .sil file, these bits need to be made
explicit.
Performance Notes: This is memory neutral for compilations from Swift
source code, because the variable name is still stored in the AST. For
compilations from textual source the variable name is stored in tail-
allocated memory following the SIL instruction that introduces the
variable.
<rdar://problem/22707128>
All refutable patterns and function parameters marked with 'var'
is now an error.
- Using explicit 'let' keyword on function parameters causes a warning.
- Don't suggest making function parameters mutable
- Remove uses in the standard library
- Update tests
rdar://problem/23378003
SILPrinter was printing uses for all SIL values, except for SIL basic blocks arguments. Fill the gap and print uses for BB arguments as well. This makes reading and analyzing SIL easier.
Basic blocks may have multiple arguments, therefore print uses of each BB argument on separate lines - one line per BB argument.
The comment containing information about uses of a BB argument is printed on the line just above the basic block name, following the approach used for function_ref and other kinds of instructions, which have additional information printed on the line above the actual instruction.
The output now looks like:
// %0 // user: %3
// %1 // user: %9
bb0(%0 : $Int32, %1 : $UnsafeMutablePointer<UnsafeMutablePointer<Int8>>):
rdar://23336589
And include some supplementary mangling changes:
- Give the first generic param (depth=0, index=0) a single character mangling. Even after removing the self type from method declaration types, 'Self' still shows up very frequently in protocol requirement signatures.
- Fix the mangling of generic parameter counts to elide the count when there's only one parameter at the starting depth of the mangling.
Together these carve another 154KB out of a debug standard library. There's some awkwardness in demangled strings that I'll clean up in subsequent commits; since decl types now only mangle the number of generic params at their own depth, it's context-dependent what depths those represent, which we get wrong now. Currying markers are also wrong, but since free function currying is going away, we can mangle the partial application thunks in different ways.
Swift SVN r32896
Make the following illegal:
switch thing {
case .A(var x):
modify(x0
}
And provide a replacement 'var' -> 'let' fix-it.
rdar://problem/23172698
Swift SVN r32883
'Ss' appears in manglings tens of thousands of times in the standard library and is also incredibly frequent in other modules. This alone is enough to shrink the standard library by 59KB.
Swift SVN r32409
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
(containing just an uncond branch) when a shared block isn't actually shared.
This is a revised version of r26676 that makes sure to emit the cleanups for a
case pattern as soon as possible. Extending the lifetime of the case value
across the body of the switch caused extra copies of COW types.
Swift SVN r26685
Now you can write:
switch nil as Int? {
case let x?: break
case nil: break
}
and this will generate code equivalent to using:
switch nil as Int? {
case let x?: break
case .None: break
}
This switch is exhaustive and no unreachable code is generated.
rdar://20130266
Swift SVN r26635
"similar", avoiding false positive "not exhaustive" diagnostics on switches
like:
switch ... {
case let x?: break
case .None: break
}
Also, start using x? patterns in the stdlib more (review appreciated!), which
is what shook this issue out.
Swift SVN r26004
a let/var pattern. Now any identifier in one of these is a variable binding,
not sometimes a value references (depending on contextual syntax).
This isn't expected to have a widespread effect on existing real world code:
- No impact on the stdlib.
- It does fix two validation crash tests, but possibly because the original issue is hidden by a different diagnostic path in the compiler.
- This needed two tests to be tweaked to undistribute "let".
On the positive side, this means that "case let x?:" now works properly, woo.
Swift SVN r26000
This introduces a new pattern, spelled "x?" which is sugar for
matching ".Some(x)". It also changes the parser slightly so that
_ (the discard expr) is parsed as a unary expr instead of as an
expr. This allows it to have postfix ? after it, which is important
in pattern contexts to support "case _?:".
Swift SVN r25907
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
In a situation like::
enum Foo {
case Bar(bar: Int)
}
switch foo {
case let .Bar(bar):
use(bar)
}
It's extremely unlikely anyone expects 'bar' to have type '(bar: Int)' rather than 'Int', especially because we try to eliminate single-element tuple types pretty much everywhere else. Put in a hack so that, when we see a paren pattern as the payload subpattern of an enum case pattern, and the payload has a single-element tuple type, we transform the paren pattern into a tuple pattern, which semantically matches off the label. Fixes rdar://problem/18923473, and a lot of dupes.
Swift SVN r25541
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Now the SILLinkage for functions and global variables is according to the swift visibility (private, internal or public).
In addition, the fact whether a function or global variable is considered as fragile, is kept in a separate flag at SIL level.
Previously the linkage was used for this (e.g. no inlining of less visible functions to more visible functions). But it had no effect,
because everything was public anyway.
For now this isFragile-flag is set for public transparent functions and for everything if a module is compiled with -sil-serialize-all,
i.e. for the stdlib.
For details see <rdar://problem/18201785> Set SILLinkage correctly and better handling of fragile functions.
The benefits of this change are:
*) Enable to eliminate unused private and internal functions
*) It should be possible now to use private in the stdlib
*) The symbol linkage is as one would expect (previously almost all symbols were public).
More details:
Specializations from fragile functions (e.g. from the stdlib) now get linkonce_odr,default
linkage instead of linkonce_odr,hidden, i.e. they have public visibility.
The reason is: if such a function is called from another fragile function (in the same module),
then it has to be visible from a third module, in case the fragile caller is inlined but not
the specialized function.
I had to update lots of test files, because many CHECK-LABEL lines include the linkage, which has changed.
The -sil-serialize-all option is now handled at SILGen and not at the Serializer.
This means that test files in sil format which are compiled with -sil-serialize-all
must have the [fragile] attribute set for all functions and globals.
The -disable-access-control option doesn't help anymore if the accessed module is not compiled
with -sil-serialize-all, because the linker will complain about unresolved symbols.
A final note: I tried to consider all the implications of this change, but it's not a low-risk change.
If you have any comments, please let me know.
Swift SVN r22215
Run whole-module checks at the end of perform Sema, specifically
TryAddFinal. After everything has been type checked, accessibility has
been provided, and we have had a chance to see any potential
overrides, we try to add the final attribute to class members.
This ends up de-virtualizing many functions, or rather they avoid the
vtable altogether. Thus, there are many test file changes. New test
file add_final.swift. Other tests updated to either reflect the
non-virtual call, or to have public added to them.
Swift SVN r20338
eliminating the @'s from them when used on func's. This is progress towards
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
This also consolidates rejection of custom operator definitions into one
place and makes it consistent, and adds postfix "?" to the list of rejected
operators.
This also changes the demangler to demangle weak/inout/postfix and related things
without the @.
Swift SVN r19929
When the Index type of a Range is Comparable, we can reject invalid
ranges at their formation.
It might be worth injecting some checkability concept into ForwardIndex
so that even in generic contexts where Comparability is unknown, we can
do this same check in the Range constructor.
Also, remove pattern matching support for Ranges of RandomAccessIndex,
as that is covered by Interval.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16254937> (#Seed 4: Ranges with negative strides
are broken) to the extent possible (it's still possible to form an
invalid Range of indices that are not Comparable)
Fixes <rdar://problem/17164391> (Swift: Using ranges in for in for
counting down, causes the loop to go inifinely)
Fixes <rdar://problem/17580871> (Swift: Closed range with negative
endpoint excludes that endpoint)
Swift SVN r19903
This allows 0.0..<10.3 and 0.1...4.4 to work properly in pattern
matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12016900> (#Seed 4: add a "contains" method to the
range types) by making "contains" available on Interval
Addresses <rdar://problem/16254937> (#Seed 4: Ranges with negative
strides are broken) by making the formation of an invalid Interval a
runtime error.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16304317> (Range<T> has limited awesomeness: it is
restricted to types that conform to ForwardIndex)
Fixes <rdar://problem/16736924> (#Seed 4: Enable range inclusion pattern
matching for all types that conform to Equatable and Comparable)
Addresses <rdar://problem/16846325> (#Seed 4: Introduce index range) by
distinguishing Range (which operates on indices) from Interval
Fixes <rdar://problem/17051263> (Pattern-matching a Double range with an
infinite endpoint triggers an assertion failure)
Fixes <rdar://problem/17051271> (#Seed 4: Pattern-matching Double ranges
excludes fractional values)
Addresses <rdar://problem/17171420> (Separate types for closed and
half-open ranges)
Swift SVN r19900
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
Specialization now recurses on only that prefix of the
current matrix which shares a specialization form
(essentially, a pattern kind) with the head row. This is
inferior to the previous algorithm in a number of ways: we
may require more switches to perform a single dispatch, and
we may introduce more redundant variables in the leaves.
However, it also means that we will have fully specialized a
row along exactly one path in the decision tree, which makes
it much easier to work with dispatches that introduce new
cleanups.
This change also changes switch-dispatch to use the new
dynamic-cast instructions.
Incidentally fixes rdar://16401831.
Swift SVN r19336
When we specialize the decision matrix on a pattern, we have to start with the *first* preceding wildcard, not the last. Oops. While we're here, clean things up a bit by using Optional instead of magic integer values to track the first wildcard row. Fixes <rdar://problem/17272985>.
Swift SVN r19061
