"unavoidable failure" path, along with Failure::DoesNotHaveNonMutatingMember and
just doing some basic disambiguation in CSDiags.
This provides some benefits:
- Allows us to plug in much more specific diagnostics for the existing "only has
mutating members" diagnostic, including producing notes for why the base expr
isn't mutable (see e.g. test/Sema/immutability.swift diffs).
- Corrects issues where we'd drop full decl name info for selector references.
- Wordsmiths diagnostics to not complain about "values of type Foo.Type" instead
complaining about "type Foo"
- Where before we would diagnose all failures with "has no member named", we now
distinguish between when there is no member, and when you can't use it. When you
can't use it, you get a vauge "cannot use it" diagnostic, but...
- This provides an infrastructure for diagnosing other kinds of problems (e.g.
trying to use a private member or a static member from an instance).
- Improves a number of cases where failed type member constraints would produce uglier
diagnostics than a different constraint failure would.
- Resolves a number of rdars, e.g. (and probably others):
<rdar://problem/20294245> QoI: Error message mentions value rather than key for subscript
Swift SVN r30715
get the same wording, fixing <rdar://problem/21964599> Different diagnostics for the same issue
While I'm in the area, remove some dead code.
Swift SVN r30713
- Improve handling of if_expr in a couple of ways: teach constraint simplification
about IfThen/IfElse and teach CSDiags about the case when the cond expr doesn't match
BooleanType. This is rarely necessary, but CSDiags is all about cornercases, and this
does fix a problem in a testcase.
- Be a bit more specific about the constraint failure kind (e.g. say subtype) and when
we have a protocol conformance failure, emit a specific diagnostic about it, instead of
just saying that the types aren't convertible.
Swift SVN r30650
conversion failures, making a bunch of diagnostics more specific and useful.
UnavoidableFailures can be very helpful, but they can also be the first constraint
failure that the system happened to come across... which is not always the most
meaningful one. CSDiag's expr processing machinery has a generally better way of
narrowing down which ones make the most sense.
Swift SVN r30647
Eliminates _CollectionDefaultsType and _CollectionGeneratorDefaultsType
and creates sanity that should allow us to Protocol Extension-ize the
lazy operations, which have been blocked on inscrutable errors due in
part to the existing complexity.
Note: names beginning with "_prext_" are intended to be public after API
review and removal of the "_prext_" prefix.
Swift SVN r29689
this is neutral w.r.t. diagnostics quality, but deletes a ton
of code:
include/swift/AST/DiagnosticsSema.def | 21 ++---------
lib/Sema/CSDiag.cpp | 64 ++--------------------------------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
Swift SVN r28956
if it has already resolved a member binding of an UnresolvedDotExpr. This allows
us to give tailored diagnostics to indicate whether the destination is not an lvalue
because the property itself was immutable or when the base is immutable.
In addition to improved diagnostics, this allows us to fixit hint "let" to "var" on
property definitions, and we can even go so far as to fixit hint insert 'mutating' on
the enclosing func decl when self is the problem.
This fixes the non-subscript cases of:
<rdar://problem/17632908> QoI: Modifying struct member in non-mutating function produces difficult to understand error message
<rdar://problem/19370429> QoI: fixit to add "mutating" when assigning to a member of self in a struct
<rdar://problem/20234955> QoI: Error message for assigning to 'let' fields should say that the error is due to a 'let' binding
Subscript cases to follow.
Swift SVN r28854
var/let bindings to _ when they are never used, and use some values that
are only written. This is a testsuite cleanup, NFC. More to come.
Swift SVN r28406
The code would generate different diagnosics depending on
the cycle having length 1 or longer. The length 1 case
was broken if the path had a prefix that wasn't part
of the cycle, eg if we have C : A, A : A and visit C
first.
Swift SVN r28317
If a generic parameter is not referred to from a function signature, it can never be inferred and thus such a function can never be invoked.
We now produce the following error:
generic parameter 'T' is not used in function signature
func f8<T> (x: Int) {}
This commit takes Jordan't comments on r28181 into account:
- it produces a shorter error message
- it does not change the compiler_crashers_fixed test and add a new expected error instead
Swift SVN r28194
If a generic parameter is not referred to from a function signature, it can never be inferred and thus such a function can never be invoked.
We now produce the following error:
There is no way to infer the generic parameter 'T' if it is not used in function signature
func f8<T> (x: Int) {}
^
Swift SVN r28181
If you want to make the parameter and argument label the same in
places where you don't get the argument label for free (i.e., the
first parameter of a function or a parameter of a subscript),
double-up the identifier:
func translate(dx dx: Int, dy: Int) { }
Make this a warning with Fix-Its to ease migration. Part of
rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27715
We're still not using these generated conformances as our primary
source of conformances, but now we can create them here and it doesn't
break anything.
Swift SVN r26297
Previously, a multi-pattern var/let decl like:
var x = 4, y = 17
would produce two pattern binding decls (one for x=4 one for y=17). This is convenient
in some ways, but is bad for source reproducibility from the ASTs (see, e.g. the improvements
in test/IDE/structure.swift and test/decl/inherit/initializer.swift).
The hardest part of this change was to get parseDeclVar to set up the AST in a way
compatible with our existing assumptions. I ended up with an approach that forms PBDs in
more erroneous cases than before. One downside of this is that we now produce a spurious
"type annotation missing in pattern"
diagnostic in some cases. I'll take care of that in a follow-on patch.
Swift SVN r26224
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
rdar://problem/17198298
- Allow 'static' in protocol property and func requirements, but not 'class'.
- Allow 'static' methods in classes - they are 'class final'.
- Only allow 'class' methods in classes (or extensions of classes)
- Remove now unneeded diagnostics related to finding 'static' in previously banned places.
- Update relevant diagnostics to make the new rules clear.
Swift SVN r24260
The old message, "deinitializer does not have a parameter clause," was
confusing because it would be issued for a deinit that clearly *had* a
parameter clause. Also, one out of three messages called deinitializers
"'deinitializer' functions." Since "deinitializer" does not appear in
the program text, it doesn't make sense to quote it, either.
Swift SVN r21468
When a non-final class satisfies a method requirement that returns
Self, it must do so with a method that also returns (dynamic)
Self. This ensures conformance will be inheritable, closing off an
awful type-safety hole <rdar://problem/16880016>. Other
non-contravariant uses of Self in the signatures of requirements cause
the protocol to be unusable by non-final classes.
I had to leave a tiny little gaping hole for the ~> operator, whose
removal is covered by <rdar://problem/17828741>. We can possibly put
this on firm footing with clever handling of generic witnesses, but
it's not important right now.
Swift SVN r20626
modifiers and with the func implementations of the operators. This resolves the rest of:
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
Swift SVN r19931
eliminating the @'s from them when used on func's. This is progress towards
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
This also consolidates rejection of custom operator definitions into one
place and makes it consistent, and adds postfix "?" to the list of rejected
operators.
This also changes the demangler to demangle weak/inout/postfix and related things
without the @.
Swift SVN r19929
This only tackles the protocol case (<rdar://problem/17510790>); it
does not yet generalize to an arbitrary "class" requirement on either
existentials or generics.
Swift SVN r19896
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
- Change the parser to accept "objc" without an @ sign as a contextual
keyword, including the dance to handle the general parenthesized case.
- Update all comments to refer to "objc" instead of "@objc".
- Update all diagnostics accordingly.
- Update all tests that fail due to the diagnostics change.
- Switch the stdlib to use the new syntax.
This does not switch all tests to use the new syntax, nor does it warn about
the old syntax yet. That will be forthcoming. Also, this needs a bit of
refactoring, which will be coming up.
Swift SVN r19555
Better to describe how the protocol can be used than how it can't. Also include a mention of Self type requirements as a source of non-existentiability.
Swift SVN r19207
These types are often useless and confusing to users who expect to be able to use Sequence or Generator as types in their own right like in C# or Java. While we're here, relax the rules for self-conformance to admit methods returning 'Self'. Covariant return types should not actually prevent a protocol type from conforming to itself, and the stdlib makes particular use of protocols with 'init' requirements which implicitly return Self.
Swift SVN r18989
There's a lot more work to do here, but start to categorize tests
along the lines of what a specification might look like, with
directories (chapters) for basic concepts, declarations, expressions,
statements, etc.
Swift SVN r9958
