* Refactor Tuple Type Syntax
This patch:
- Refactors TypeArgumentListSyntax and
TypeArgumentListSyntaxData to use the SyntaxCollection and
SyntaxCollectionData APIs.
- Refactors TupleTypeElementSyntax to own its trailing comma, and
updates the tests accordingly.
- Provides an infrastructure for promoting types to use
the SyntaxCollection APIs
* Addressed comments.
* Renamed makeBlankTypeArgumentList()
* Update makeTupleType
* Changed makeTupleType to take an element list.
* Updated comment.
* Improved API for creating TupleTypeElementListSyntax'es
* Added round-trip test
* Removed last TypeArgumentList holdovers.
* Fixed round-trip test invocation
Implements the following grammar productions:
- function-parameter-list
- function-parameter
This is mostly reusable for other flavors of function declarations,
such as initializers and whatnot, but those will have separate
top-level syntax nodes.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4067
This will make it easier to incrementally implement syntax nodes,
while allowing us to embed nodes that we do know about inside ones
that we don't.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4062
Instead of spawning a thread across test iterations (whoops, out of
threads), use a thread pool of size 2. When turning off atomic caching,
this is enough to trigger a race in 5 iterations or fewer for me, so
10000 ought to be enough for most machines.
This should fix hitting the thread limit on Linux.
rdar://problem/30729901
Also includes for its substructure:
- function-call-argument
- function-call-argument-list
- symbolic-reference-expression (for the call target)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4044
A return statement needs something to return, so implement
integer-literal-expression too. This necessarily also forced
UnknownExprSyntax, UnknownStmtSyntax, and UnknownDeclSyntax,
which are stand-in token buckets for when we don't know
how to transform/migrate an AST.
This commit also contains the core function for caching
SyntaxData children. This is highly tricky code, with some
detailed comments in SyntaxData.{h,cpp}. The gist is that
we have to atomically swap in a SyntaxData pointer into the
child field, so we can maintain pointer identity of SyntaxData
nodes, while still being able to cache them internally.
To prove that this works, there is a multithreaded test that
checks that two threads can ask for a child that hasn't been
cached yet without crashing or violating pointer identity.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4010
Add an option to the lexer to go back and get a list of "full"
tokens, which include their leading and trailing trivia, which
we can index into from SourceLocs in the current AST.
This starts the Syntax sublibrary, which will support structured
editing APIs. Some skeleton support and basic implementations are
in place for types and generics in the grammar. Yes, it's slightly
redundant with what we have right now. lib/AST conflates syntax
and semantics in the same place(s); this is a first step in changing
that to separate the two concepts for clarity and also to get closer
to incremental parsing and type-checking. The goal is to eventually
extract all of the syntactic information from lib/AST and change that
to be more of a semantic/symbolic model.
Stub out a Semantics manager. This ought to eventually be used as a hub
for encapsulating lazily computed semantic information for syntax nodes.
For the time being, it can serve as a temporary place for mapping from
Syntax nodes to semantically full lib/AST nodes.
This is still in a molten state - don't get too close, wear appropriate
proximity suits, etc.
