This is the lifetime ending variant of fix_lifetime. It is a lie to the
ownership verifier that a value is being consumed along a path. Its intention is
to be used to allow for the static verification of ownership in deallocating
deinits which for compatibility with objective-c have weird ownership behavior.
See the commit merged with this commit for more information.
The reason why I am introducing special instructions is so I can maintain the
qualified ownership API wedge in between qualified SIL and the rest of the ARC
instructions that are pervasively used in the compiler.
These instructions in the future /could/ be extended to just take @sil_unmanaged
operands directly, but I want to maintain flexibility to take regular
non-trivial operands in the short term.
rdar://29791263
This was in the first high level ARC instruction proposal, but I have not needed
it until now. The use case for this is to ahandle strong_retain_unowned (which
takes in an unowned value, asserts it is still alive, performs a strong_retain,
and returns the @owned value). This @owned value needs a destroy_value.
rdar://29671437
Noticed this while preparing copy_value, destroy_value. The problem was that we
were not parsing the SIL Debug Location at the end of
mark_uninitialized_behavior.
This ireapplies commit 255c52de9f.
Original commit message:
Serialize debug scope and location info in the SIL assembler language.
At the moment it is only possible to test the effects that SIL
optimization passes have on debug information by observing the
effects of a full .swift -> LLVM IR compilation. This change enable us
to write targeted testcases for single SIL optimization passes.
The new syntax is as follows:
sil-scope-ref ::= 'scope' [0-9]+
sil-scope ::= 'sil_scope' [0-9]+ '{'
sil-loc
'parent' scope-parent
('inlined_at' sil-scope-ref )?
'}'
scope-parent ::= sil-function-name ':' sil-type
scope-parent ::= sil-scope-ref
sil-loc ::= 'loc' string-literal ':' [0-9]+ ':' [0-9]+
Each instruction may have a debug location and a SIL scope reference
at the end. Debug locations consist of a filename, a line number, and
a column number. If the debug location is omitted, it defaults to the
location in the SIL source file. SIL scopes describe the position
inside the lexical scope structure that the Swift expression a SIL
instruction was generated from had originally. SIL scopes also hold
inlining information.
<rdar://problem/22706994>
At the moment it is only possible to test the effects that SIL
optimization passes have on debug information by observing the
effects of a full .swift -> LLVM IR compilation. This change enable us
to write targeted testcases for single SIL optimization passes.
The new syntax is as follows:
sil-scope-ref ::= 'scope' [0-9]+
sil-scope ::= 'sil_scope' [0-9]+ '{'
sil-loc
'parent' scope-parent
('inlined_at' sil-scope-ref )?
'}'
scope-parent ::= sil-function-name ':' sil-type
scope-parent ::= sil-scope-ref
sil-loc ::= 'loc' string-literal ':' [0-9]+ ':' [0-9]+
Each instruction may have a debug location and a SIL scope reference
at the end. Debug locations consist of a filename, a line number, and
a column number. If the debug location is omitted, it defaults to the
location in the SIL source file. SIL scopes describe the position
inside the lexical scope structure that the Swift expression a SIL
instruction was generated from had originally. SIL scopes also hold
inlining information.
<rdar://problem/22706994>
These are a result of sil-mode being originally based on Swift mode. These swift
statements never show up in SIL output (which does not show Swift bodies), so just remove it.
There's a buggy SIL verifier check that was previously tautological,
and it turns out that it's violated, apparently harmlessly. Since it
was already doing nothing, I've commented it out temporarily while
I figure out the right way to fix SILGen to get the invariant right.
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
