Teach a BoundGenericType to compute its own substitutions, which
allows AST clients to create new bound generic types without the aid
of the type checker.
This eliminates the TypeChecker::validateTypeSimple() abomination as
well as the need for the BoundGenericType AST validation step. There
is still more cleanup to do in this area.
Note that BoundGenericType::getSubstitutions() now accepts a module
parameter, which is the place from which we will look for
conformances. This is a baby step toward properly modeling the
conformances as part of the bound generic type, and is nowhere near
complete.
Swift SVN r8193
This eliminates the need for the hackish
LazyResolver::resolveUnvalidatedType() entry point, making type
substitution on ASTs far more useful. As part of this, teach it to
handle conformances for existentials and archetypes.
Swift SVN r8169
This allows AST clients to perform type substitutions without
requiring a type checker. Test this by performing substitutions within
the AST verifier.
Swift SVN r8166
Introduce an AST operation that, given a type and a protocol, determines
whether the type conforms to the protocol and produces the protocol
conformance structure. Previously, this operation was only available
on the type checker, requiring many callbacks from the AST to the type
checker during AST substitution operations (for example).
Now, we only call back into the type checker when we hit a case where
we see an explicit conformance in the AST, but the actual
ProtocolConformance object has not yet been built due to lazy type
checking.
Note that we still require a resolver (i.e., a TypeChecker) in a few
places, although we shouldn't need it outside of lazy type
checking. I'll loosen up the restrictions next.
There's a minor diagnostics regression here that will be cleaned up in
a future commit.
Swift SVN r8129
getDisplayDecls() was introduced for ":print_module" and works slightly differently, e.g.
it will return the decls from a shadowed clang module, since we want to display them.
Swift SVN r7909
Clean up the "can be accessed by dynamic lookup" predicate so that it
checks for a generic context. We no longer need to do the checking in
name lookup, since this means that the dynamic lookup table won't have
anything we can't use (thanks Jordan!). Drop the [objc] allowance for
members of a generic context: it still leaves us with a very weird
case of messaging something when we can't even figure out the type
that we think the object has.
Extend the walk searching for members to include inner classes within
structs, so we get all of the members globally.
Swift SVN r7799
Previously, export control (via [exported]) only applied to modules that
had been serialized -- anything imported in a TranslationUnit was
automatically considered exported. This was done to make life easier when
dealing with the main source file, but it turns out we're going to want to
load other source files as imports, and export control should work there too.
Now, the module iteration methods (Module::forAllVisibleModules,
namelookup::lookupInModule, etc.) can consider the module being passed as
"top-level", meaning its private imports are visible as well. Otherwise,
proper export control is observed even for imported TranslationUnits.
This required a number of test changes involving Swift adapter modules that
forgot to re-export their Clang modules.
Swift SVN r7783
Per discussion with Doug, there's no reason why this should not work:
class Outer {
class Inner {
func extract() { ... }
}
}
var obj : DynamicLookup = ...
obj.extract!()
Swift SVN r7763
This is basically the same as doing a :print_decl on every decl in the module,
except that it does not print extensions that come from other modules, and
/does/ print extensions and operators that come from this module.
Does not yet work for Clang modules or the Builtin module.
Swift SVN r7601
...and use it to load frameworks and libraries in immediate modes (-i and
the REPL), replacing a walk of visible modules that checked if any imported
modules were Clang modules.
Swift SVN r7488
...instead of just those that are re-exported. This will be used for
autolinking (and probably few other places).
As part of this, we get two name changes:
(1) Module::getReexportedModules -> getImportedModules
(2) TranslationUnit::getImportedModules -> getImports
The latter doesn't just get modules-plus-access-paths; it also includes
whether or not the import is re-exported. Mainly, though, it just didn't
seem like a good idea to overload this name when the two functions aren't
really related.
No tests yet, will come with autolinking.
Swift SVN r7487
A part of my mind wanted to skip the kind check in Module's implementation
of these if we already knew we were dealing with a LoadedModule, but the
extra level of indirection is fairly annoying. Just jump straight to the
LoadedModule's owner here.
(We can't use virtual methods because we want Module to stay vtable-free.)
Swift SVN r7337
This will be used to resolve properties and method calls on objects with
dynamic-lookup ("id") type. For now, this is tested in swift-ide-test
by using the -dynamic-lookup-completion option and providing a
-code-completion-token value.
Caveats/TODOs:
- As before, since we're using the global method pool, this isn't scoped by
module. We could do a per-module filter, but I don't know if that will
actually buy us much.
- Again, Clang's method pool does not include methods from protocols.
- Lookup by selector name cannot find properties with a customized getter
name. <rdar://problem/14776565>
- The Clang-side method pool is keyed by selector, but Swift wants to look
things up by method name, which maps to the first selector piece, so we
end up having to do a scan of all the selectors in the pool.
Swift SVN r7330
With this, we can now get a list of all class members* available in the
current translation unit, which will be necessary for doing id-style
dynamic lookup (inferring which method you're referring to when the base
type is some magic "dynamic lookup" type).
* Including members of protocols, since a class we don't know about could
have implemented the protocol.
Since there is no code currently using this, I've added a new mode to
swift-ide-test to just dump all class members -- what will eventually
happen when you code complete on a dynamic lookup type. This mode will
go away once the other pieces of id-style lookup are in place.
Swift SVN r7287
This is a tradeoff, assuming that lookup in a particular module is less
likely to be repeated than lookup within the current source file. By
storing the cached results with the TU's own local lookup cache, the
results get cleared out when we parse additional decls.
Since this is only used by code completion, there's no performance benefit
for the compiler, or even for swift-ide-test...it's only in repeated lookups
that this will be useful.
Swift SVN r7169
This eliminates the pre-pass we were performing to bind the operator
decls, which was only a pre-pass because we used to bind unresolved
declaration references too early. In the process, fixed some bugs
(e.g., it wasn't checking methods at all) and improved the QoI with
Fix-Its and notes:
t.swift:2:6: error: prefix unary operator missing 'prefix' attribute
func ~~~(x : Float) {}
^
[prefix]
t.swift:1:17: note: prefix operator found here
operator prefix ~~~ {}
^
Swift SVN r7099
This required a general reworking of the algorithm for qualified name lookup.
Originally, qualified lookup only applied to a module -- not to its exports.
This meant that "Cocoa.NSWindow" would fail, so that was changed to grovel
through all exported modules looking for decls if the top-level module didn't
provide any.
Now, we actually do a breadth-based search, stopping at each level if decls
are provided for a given name. We also now prefer scoped imports to unscoped
imports, so "import abcde" and "import struct asdf.D" will result in a
(qualified) reference to 'D' being unambiguous.
Not working yet:
- Shadowing for unqualified lookup.
- Shadowing by types, so that overloads from this module can merge with
overloads from its exports.
Swift SVN r7014
Before this change, DeclContext of all imported decls was set to the first
imported module.
No tests now, will be tested by future code completion commits.
Swift SVN r6949
Note that the import kind is not checked yet; this is effectively our old
behavior for "import swift.print".
Infrastructure: move Module::forAllVisibleModules out-of-line, and add
makeStackLambda to STLExtras for using a non-escaping lambda with
std::function.
Swift SVN r6852
This iterates over a module's exports, transitively, in an unspecified
but deterministic order. This is useful for any sort of lookup and for
managing transitive inclusion. It also allows us to remove the hack in
Sema for loading a Clang module's adapter module, and just rely on the
previous commit.
Swift SVN r6699
This makes it very clear who is depending on special behavior at the
module level. Doing isa<ClangModule> now requires a header import; anything
more requires actually linking against the ClangImporter library.
If the current source file really can't import ClangModule.h, it can
still fall back to checking against the DeclContext's getContextKind()
(and indeed AST currently does in a few places).
Swift SVN r6695
This involved threading it through ModuleLoader, as with all the other
module-generic callbacks. I plan to collapse a bit of the chaining, but
unfortunately not that much.
This brings back the CodeCompletion tests.
Swift SVN r6527
Rather than automatically re-exporting or not re-exporting every import in
a TranslationUnit, we'll eventually want to control which imports are local
(most of them) and which imports are shared with eventual module loaders.
It's probably not worth implementing this for TranslationUnit, but
LoadedModule can certainly do something here.
Currently, a LoadedModule is even more permissive than a TranslationUnit:
all imports are re-exported. We can lock down on this once we have a
re-export syntax.
Swift SVN r6523
...and use it for shadowed modules (e.g. the Clang module "Foundation"
referenced by the Swift module "Foundation"), so that we can actually
find "NSString" when building AppKit.
Additionally, record shadowed modules as dependencies, so that they can
be loaded when the adapter module is loaded.
Swift SVN r6522
This keeps AST insulated from the various module-loading interfaces, which
minimizes special-casing of the differences between ClangModule and the
(upcoming) SerializedModule.
Swift SVN r5096
This paves the way for having a Swift module importer. The eventual goal
here is to eliminate all explicit uses of the Clang module loader, but
I'm not going to push too hard on that for now.
Swift SVN r5092
During name binding, associate func decls with operator decls. When parsing SequenceExprs, look up operator decls to determine associativity and precedence of infix operators. Remove the infix_left and infix_left attributes, and make the infix attribute a simple declared attribute [infix] with no precedence.
Operator decls are resolved as follows:
- If an operator is declared in the same module as the use, resolve to the declaration in the current module.
- Otherwise, import operator declarations from all imported modules. If more than one declaration is imported for the operator and they conflict, raise an ambiguity error. If they are equivalent, pick one arbitrarily.
This allows operator declarations within the current module to override imported declarations if desired or to disambiguate conflicting operator declarations.
I've updated the standard library and the tests. stdlib2 and some of the examples still need to be updated.
Swift SVN r4629
Integrating Clang's FindVisibleDecls with Swift's by importing every decl created too much per-repl-entry compile time overhead, so as a workaround, just wire completions directly to FindVisibleDecls on the clang translation unit itself. Unfortunately this means we get completions for things Swift can't import yet, but it also means we don't have to wait 30 seconds to compile every entry after doing a completion.
Swift SVN r4061
Implement a 'lookupVisibleDecls' API similar to Clang's that replicates the UnqualifiedLookup logic for walking through a given scope looking for decls. Use it to populate the completion list in the repl.
Still to be done: Clang module lookup via Clang's lookupVisibleDecls, and context deduction from dotted path expressions.
Swift SVN r4056
From a user's perspective, one imports Clang modules using the normal
Swift syntax for module imports, e.g.,
import Cocoa
However, to enable importing Clang modules, one needs to point Swift
at a particular SDK with the -sdk= argument, e.g.,
swift -sdk=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.9M.sdk
and, of course, that SDK needs to provide support for modules.
There are a number of moving parts here. The major pieces are:
CMake support for linking Clang into Swift: CMake users will now need
to set the SWIFT_PATH_TO_CLANG_SOURCE and SWIFT_PATH_TO_CLANG_BUILD
to the locations of the Clang source tree (which defaults to
tools/clang under your LLVM source tree) and the Clang build tree.
Makefile support for linking Clang into Swift: Makefile users will
need to have Clang located in tools/clang and Swift located in
tools/swift, and builds should just work.
Module loader abstraction: similar to Clang's module loader,
a module loader is responsible for resolving a module name to an
actual module, loading that module in the process. It will also be
responsible for performing name lookup into that module.
Clang importer: the only implementation of the module loader
abstraction, the importer creates a Clang compiler instance capable of
building and loading Clang modules. The approach we take here is to
parse a dummy .m file in Objective-C ARC mode with modules enabled,
but never tear down that compilation unit. Then, when we get a request
to import a Clang module, we turn that into a module-load request to
Clang's module loader, which will build an appropriate module
on-the-fly or used a cached module file.
Note that name lookup into Clang modules is not yet
implemented. That's the next major step.
Swift SVN r3199
static method to call it, to make it more explicit what is happening. Avoid
using TypeLoc::withoutLoc for function definitions; instead, just use an empty
TypeLoc.
Swift SVN r2606
