Commit Graph

21 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konrad `ktoso` Malawski
b267778bf1 Rebased to use new global executor 2020-12-17 06:05:13 +09:00
Konrad `ktoso` Malawski
9e1ecc539c [Concurrency] guard offer/poll with a lock for now; cleanups 2020-12-17 06:05:13 +09:00
Konrad `ktoso` Malawski
7b37554096 [Concurrency] Initial TaskGroup implementation working 2020-12-17 06:05:13 +09:00
Konrad `ktoso` Malawski
e294c7cbad [Concurrency] Implement TaskGroup.isEmpty via readyQueue
before reversing order of fragments; future must be last since dynamic
size

offer fixed

before implementing poll
2020-12-17 06:05:13 +09:00
Konrad `ktoso` Malawski
520b513e8a [Concurrency] Task: isCancelled,checkCancelled implementation
move comments to the wired up continuations

remove duplicated continuations; leep the wired up ones

before moving to C++ for queue impl

trying to next wait via channel_poll

submitting works; need to impl next()
2020-12-17 06:05:13 +09:00
John McCall
853a8657dd Add a basic default-actor implementation with support for
eagerly adopting and abandoning threads.
2020-12-02 18:47:02 -05:00
John McCall
0555a86f82 Extract executor stuff out into a separate header and
start introducing the idea of a swiftasync CC.
2020-12-02 18:47:02 -05:00
Konrad `ktoso` Malawski
261f0d2dcd +task Implement Task.currentPriority 2020-11-20 09:00:41 +09:00
Doug Gregor
4fb5f05f37 [Concurrency] More cleanups for futures 2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
ab932dbbff [Concurrency] Remove an unnecessary 'const' from a non-static data member.
'const' breaks compilation on newer compilers.
2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
c0fd27fbe5 [Concurrency] Minor cleanups to futures. 2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
7f3db7fbde [Concurrency] Have future functions write their results directly.
Introduce `FutureAsyncContext` to line up with the async context formed
by IR generation for the type `<T> () async throws -> T`. When allocating
a future task, set up the context with the address of the future's storage
for the successful result and null out the error result, so the caller
will directly fill in the result. This eliminates a bunch of extra
complexity and a copy.
2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
19d9e0f4d4 [Concurrency] Clarify/fix error object handling in futures. 2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
5538aafed8 [Concurrency] Inline AsyncTask::FutureFragment::fragmentSize. 2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
0ae6c6337e [Concurrency] Use SchedulerPrivate for the "next waiting task" link.
Reduce the size of AsyncTask by using the first slot of SchedulerPrivate
for the next waiting task. Thanks, John!
2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
4b924673ce [Concurrency] Use a single atomic for future wait queue.
Use a single atomic for the wait queue that combines the status with
the first task in the queue. Address race conditions in waiting and
completing the future.

Thanks to John for setting the direction here for me.
2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
0a07f18d93 [Futures] Fix up some comments to address some comments. 2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
85d003ef9b [Concurrency] Implement basic runtime support for task futures.
Extend AsyncTask and the concurrency runtime with basic support for
task futures. AsyncTasks with futures contain a future fragment with
information about the type produced by the future, and where the
future will put the result value or the thrown error in the initial
context.

We still don't have the ability to schedule the waiting tasks on an
executor when the future completes, so this isn't useful for anything
just test, and we can only test limited code paths.
2020-11-14 15:18:54 -08:00
Doug Gregor
c291eb596b [Concurrency] Add cancelAsyncTask() builtin.
Implement a new builtin, `cancelAsyncTask()`, to cancel the given
asynchronous task. This lowers down to a call into the runtime
operation `swift_task_cancel()`.

Use this builtin to implement Task.Handle.cancel().
2020-11-05 13:50:17 -08:00
John McCall
a06d18ce81 Add API for creating unscheduled tasks.
Make all tasks into heap objects.
2020-10-22 00:53:16 -04:00
John McCall
8ac4362754 Implement a simple library for task cancellation and status management.
There are things about this that I'm far from sold on.  In
particular, I'm concerned that in order to implement escalation
correctly, we're going to have to add a status record for the
fact that the task is being executed, which means we're going
to have to potentially wait to acquire the status lock; overall,
that means making an extra runtime function call and doing some
atomics whenever we resume or suspend a task, which is an
uncomfortable amount of overhead.

The testing here is pretty grossly inadequate, but I wanted to
lay down the groundwork here.
2020-10-15 00:36:36 -04:00