It would be more abstractly correct if this got DI support so
that we destroy the member if the constructor terminates
abnormally, but we can get to that later.
Operationally it just means that in SILGlobalVariable blocks, all operands have
ownership constraint:
{OwnershipKind::Any, UseLifetimeConstraint::NonLifetimeEnding}
and all values yield an ownership kind of: OwnershipKind::None.
In derivatives of loops, no longer allocate boxes for indirect case payloads. Instead, use a custom pullback context in the runtime which contains a bump-pointer allocator.
When a function contains a differentiated loop, the closure context is a `Builtin.NativeObject`, which contains a `swift::AutoDiffLinearMapContext` and a tail-allocated top-level linear map struct (which represents the linear map struct that was previously directly partial-applied into the pullback). In branching trace enums, the payloads of previously indirect cases will be allocated by `swift::AutoDiffLinearMapContext::allocate` and stored as a `Builtin.RawPointer`.
Specifically, I made it so that assuming our instruction is inserted into a
block already that we:
1. Return a constraint of {OwnershipKind::Any, UseLifetimeConstraint::NonLifetimeEnding}.
2. Return OwnershipKind::None for all values.
Noticed above I said that if the instruction is already inserted into a block
then we do this. The reason why is that if this is called before an instruction
is inserted into a block, we can't get access to the SILFunction that has the
information on whether or not we are in OSSA form. The only time this can happen
is if one is using these APIs from within SILBuilder since SILBuilder is the
only place where we allow this to happen. In SILBuilder, we already know whether
or not our function is in ossa or not and already does different things as
appropriate (namely in non-ossa does not call getOwnershipKind()). So we know
that if these APIs are called in such a situation, we will only be calling it if
we are in OSSA already. Given that, we just assume we are in OSSA if we do not
have a function.
To make sure that no mistakes are made as a result of that assumption, I put in
a verifier check that all values when ownership is disabled return a
OwnershipKind::None from getOwnershipKind().
The main upside to this is this means that we can write code for both
OSSA/non-OSSA and write code for non-None ownership without needing to check if
ownership is enabled.
This makes it easier to understand conceptually why a ValueOwnershipKind with
Any ownership is invalid and also allowed me to explicitly document the lattice
that relates ownership constraints/value ownership kinds.
`Builtin.createAsyncTask` takes flags, an optional parent task, and an
async/throwing function to execute, and passes it along to the
`swift_task_create_f` entry point to create a new (potentially child)
task, returning the new task and its initial context.
Implement a new builtin, `cancelAsyncTask()`, to cancel the given
asynchronous task. This lowers down to a call into the runtime
operation `swift_task_cancel()`.
Use this builtin to implement Task.Handle.cancel().
Rather than produce an "unowned" result from `getCurrentAsyncTask()`,
take advantage of the fact that the task is effectively guaranteed in
the scope. Do so be returning it as "unowned", and push an
end_lifetime cleanup to end the lifetime. This eliminates unnecessary
ref-count traffic as well as introducing another use of unowned.
Approach is thanks to Michael Gottesman, bugs are mine.
This introduces a new builtin, `getCurrentAsyncTask()`, that produces a
reference to the current task. This builtin can only be used within
`async` functions, and IR generation merely grabs the task argument
and packages it up.
The type of this function is `() -> Builtin.NativeObject`, because we
don't currently have a Swift-level representation of tasks, and can
probably handle everything through builtins or runtime calls.
Treating a trivial type as having ownership seems only to confuse the ownership verifier.
The structural property we're trying to enforce here (that a continuation is always
consumed by an `await` locally) can be enforced by flow-sensitive verification without
ownership.
It can already only accept values with none ownership and the merging of
ownership around ownership phis ensure that if we phi this with a partial_apply
or the like, we get the appropriate ownership on any such ownership phi values.
We are now out of SILGen emitting fewer destroy_value unnecessarily on
thin_to_thick functions. This changed some codegen and also forced me to update
some tests/fix AutoDiff.
I also deleted the DebugInfo test mandatoryinlining-wrongdebugscope.swift since:
1. It was depending on these destroys being there.
2. Given the need to improve the test @aprantl suggested I just eliminate it
solving the test failure for me.
`get_async_continuation[_addr]` begins a suspend operation by accessing the continuation value that can resume
the task, which can then be used in a callback or event handler before executing `await_async_continuation` to
suspend the task.
Today unchecked_bitwise_cast returns a value with ObjCUnowned ownership. This is
important to do since the instruction can truncate memory meaning we want to
treat it as a new object that must be copied before use.
This means that in OSSA we do not have a purely ossa forwarding unchecked
layout-compatible assuming cast. This role is filled by unchecked_value_cast.
The ``base_addr_for_offset`` instruction creates a base address for offset calculations.
The result can be used by address projections, like ``struct_element_addr``, which themselves return the offset of the projected fields.
IR generation simply creates a null pointer for ``base_addr_for_offset``.
* a new [immutable] attribute on ref_element_addr and ref_tail_addr
* new instructions: begin_cow_mutation and end_cow_mutation
These new instructions are intended to be used for the stdlib's COW containers, e.g. Array.
They allow more aggressive optimizations, especially for Array.
Specifically, I split it into 3 initial categories: IR, Utils, Verifier. I just
did this quickly, we can always split it more later if we want.
I followed the model that we use in SILOptimizer: ./lib/SIL/CMakeLists.txt vends
a macro (sil_register_sources) to the sub-folders that register the sources of
the subdirectory with a global state variable that ./lib/SIL/CMakeLists.txt
defines. Then after including those subdirs, the parent cmake declares the SIL
library. So the output is the same, but we have the flexibility of having
subdirectories to categorize source files.
