This is not implemented--we don't substitute the original archetypes
properly or even create a well-formed generic signature.
It doesn't make sense to me for the ExistentialSpecializer to work on
a generic before it has been fully specialized anyway. The premise of
this pass is that the generic specializer will be able to fully
specialize after generating a new "temporary" generic parameter.
Fixes rdar://56923071; [SR-11714]: Compiler crash when generic class is passed as
a parameter to a function accepting a generic class
The SIL generation for this builtin also changes: instead of generating the cond_fail instructions upfront, let the optimizer generate it, if the operand is a static string literal.
In worst case, if the second operand is not a static string literal, the Builtin.condfail is lowered at the end of the optimization pipeline with a default message: "unknown program error".
This analysis helper was inverting the result for builtins. Builtins
such as "copyMemory" were treated as never using a value.
This manifested in a crash in TestFoundation. NSDictionary's
initializer released the incoming array before copying it. This
crashed later during dictionary destruction.
The crash was hidden by a secondary bug in mayHaveSymmetricInterference
that effectively ignored the result from canNeverUseValue.
Rename the helper to canUseObject, invert the result for builtins, and
fix mayHaveSymmetricInterference to respect the result of
canUseObject.
Note that instructions that cannot access a referenced object
obviously cannot not "interfere" with a release.
Fixing these bugs now allows ARC optimization around dealloc_stack and
other operations that don't care about the reference count.
Handle calling conventions and cleanups in all the places (hopefully).
- when ExistentialSpecializer copies the specialized concrete arg into the
original existential value
- when ExistentialSpecializer generates a think
- when SILCombine substitutes concrete values in place of the opened
existential.
One particularly nasty problem is the existential boxes need to be
destroyed. It is not ok to simply destroy their value. The "leaks"
tool does not catch this problem.
Ownership SIL will make this all much more robust.
Fixes <rdar://problem/50595630> Multiple leaks detected - Swift Perf
This option no longer works but was still in the option file and help
message.
Add a temporary pass-specific option instead for debugging until this
pass has been sufficiently tested yet.
