When completing in the only expression of closure, use the return type
of the closure as the type context for the code-completion. However,
since code-completion may be on an incomplete input, we only use the
return type to improve the quality of the result, not to mark it
invalid, since (a) we may add another statement afterwards, or (b) if
the context type is Void it doesn't need to match the value.
There were 2 functions to output argument list. Consolidate them and
consistently use it from every call like production (i.e. function call,
constructor call, enum with associated values, subscript)
Instead of re-typechecking parsed expression, find typechecked
expression that corresponds to the parsed expression from the
typechecked decl context, because the sub expressions of the parsed
expression can be weirdly mutated/replaced by decl context typechecking.
rdar://problem/48141174
enum MyEnum {
case null
case str(String)
}
When completing elements for enum like this, the former shows `MyEnum`,
but the latter shows `(String) -> MyEnum`. This is inconsistent with
function call pattern which only shows the result type.
rdar://problem/48220244
`source.request.conformingmethods` is a new SourceKit request which
receives a source position and a list of protocol namses, returns a list
of methods whose return type conforms to the requested protocols.
rdar://problem/44699573
Instead of creating syntax nodes directly, modify the parser to invoke an abstract interface 'SyntaxParseActions' while it is parsing the source code.
This decouples the act of parsing from the act of forming a syntax tree representation.
'SyntaxTreeCreator' is an implementation of SyntaxParseActions that handles the logic of creating a syntax tree.
To enforce the layering separation of parsing and syntax tree creation, a static library swiftSyntaxParse is introduced to compose the two.
This decoupling is important for introducing a syntax parser library for SwiftSyntax to directly access parsing.
When debugging Objective-C or C++ code on Darwin, the debug info
collected by dsymutil in the .dSYM bundle is entirely
self-contained. It is possible to debug a program, set breakpoints and
print variables even without having the complete original source code
or a matching SDK available. With Swift, this is currently not the
case. Even though .dSYM bundles contain the binary .swiftmodule for
all Swift modules, any Clang modules that the Swift modules depend on,
still need to be imported from source to even get basic LLDB
functionality to work. If ClangImporter fails to import a Clang
module, effectively the entire Swift module depending on it gets
poisoned.
This patch is addressing this issue by introducing a ModuleLoader that
can ask queries about Clang Decls to LLDB, since LLDB knows how to
reconstruct Clang decls from DWARF and clang -gmodules producxes full
debug info for Clang modules that is embedded into the .dSYM budle.
This initial version does not contain any advanced functionality at
all, it merely produces an empty ModuleDecl. Intertestingly, even this
is a considerable improvement over the status quo. LLDB can now print
Swift-only variables in modules with failing Clang depenecies, and
becuase of fallback mechanisms that were implemented earlier, it can
even display the contents of pure Objective-C objects that are
imported into Swift. C structs obviously don't work yet.
rdar://problem/36032653
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Accept `getInterfaceType->hasError()` declarations. Even if the part of
the declaration has error, we still have chance to get context info from
the other part of it. For instance:
func foo(x: Int, y: INt) { }
foo(x: #^COMPLETE^#
We should resolve 'Int' as the context type even if parameter `y` is an
error type.
In `<expr> '(' <code-completion-token>` case, we usually complete call
arguments. If '<expr>' isn't typechecked, for example, because of
overloading, we used to give up arguments completions.
Now, use possible callee informations from the context type analyzer. This
increases the chance to provide accurate completions.
rdar://problem/43703157
In postfix completion, for operator completion, we do:
1. Type check the operand without applying it, but set the resolved
type to the root of the expression.
2. For each possible operators:
i. Build temporary binary/postfix expression
ii. Perform type checking to see whether the operator is applicable
This could be very slow especially if the operand is complex.
* Introduce `ReusePrecheckedType` option to constraint system. With
this option, CSGen respects pre-stored types in expressions and doesn't
take its sub-expressions into account.
* Improve type checking performance because type variables aren't
generated for sub-expressions of LHS (45511835)
* Guarantee that the operand is not modified by the type checker because
expression walkers in `CSGen` doesn't walk into the operand.
* Introduce `TypeChecker::findLHS()` to find LHS for a infix operator from
pre-folded expression. We used to `foldSequence()` temporary
`SequenceExpr` and find 'CodeCompletionExpr' for each attempt.
* No need to flatten folded expression after initial type-checking.
* Save memory of temporary `BinaryExpr` which used to be allocated by
`foldSequence()`.
* Improve accuracy of the completion. `foldSequence()` recovers invalid
combination of operators by `left` associative manner (with
diagnostics). This used to cause false-positive results. For instance,
`a == b <HERE>` used to suggest `==` operator. `findLHS()` returns
`nullptr` for such invalid combination.
rdar://problem/45511835
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-9061
