This matches the behavior of the current client (`swift-driver`) and reduces ambiguity in how the nodes in the graph are to be treated. Swift dependencies with a textual interface, for example, must be built into a binary module by clients. Swift dependencies without a textual interface, with only a binary module, are to be used directly, without any up-to-date checks.
Note, this is distinct from Swift dependencies that have a textual interface, for which we also detect potential pre-build binary module candidates. Those are still reported in the `details` field of textual Swift dependencies as `prebuiltModuleCandidates`.
This refactoring allows us to drop ModuleInterfaceLoader when explicit modules
are enabled. Before this change, the dependencies scanner needs the loader to be
present to access functionalities like collecting prebuilt module candidates.
This is meant to address a problem that arises on incremental package builds:
A re-scan on an already-built package instead of a placeholder dependency produces a graph that contains a dependency consisting solely of the previously-built swiftmodule.
This is not the behaviour we would like. Instead, we should respect that this is a placeholder dependency and ensure that the dependency graph for that dependency itself captures the fact that a previously-built module exists using compiledModuleCandidates field of the dependency graph.
In the fast dependency scanner, depending on whether a module intrface was found via the import search path or framework search path, encode into the dependency graph Swift module details, whether a given module is a framework.
Some implicitly imported modules aren't printed in the textual interface file as explicit import,
e.g. SwiftOnoneSupport. We should check implicit imports and add them to the dependency graph.
Instead of replacing an interface file with its up-to-date compile module,
the dep-scanner should report potentially up-to-date module candidates either adjacent to
the interface file or in the prebuilt module cache. swift-driver should later pass down
these candidates to -compile-module-from-interface invocation and the front-end job
will check if one of the candidates is ready to use. The front-end job then either emits a forwarding
module to an up-to-date candidate or a binary module.
For the explicit module mode, swift-driver uses -compile-module-from-interface to
generate modules from interfaces found by the dependency scanner. However, we don't
need to build the binary module if up-to-date modules are available, either adjacent
to the interface file or in the prebuilt module cache directory. This patch teaches
dependencies scanner to report these ready-to-use binary modules.
Building each Swift module explicitly requires dependency PCMs to be built
with the exactly same deployment target version. This means we may need to
build a Clang module multiple times with different target triples.
This patch removes the -target arguments from the reported PCM build
arguments and inserts extraPcmArgs fields to each Swift module.
swift-driver can combine the generic PCM arguments with these extra arguments
to get the command suitable for building a PCM specifically for
that loading Swift module.
Module interface builder used to maintain a separate compiler instance for
building Swift modules. The configuration of this compiler instance is also
useful for dependencies scanner because it needs to emit front-end compiler invocation
for building Swift modules explicitly.
This patch refactor the configuration out to a delegate class, and the
delegate class is also used by the dependency scanner.
Additional flags in interface files may change parsing behavior like #if
statements. We should use a fresh ASTContext with these additional
flags when parsing interface files to collect imports.
rdar://62612027
