With the upcoming `MemberImportVisibility` feature enabled, code built with Cxx
interop also enabled could be rejected by the compiler with cryptic errors
about the `__ObjC` module not being imported. This is the result of a
surprising implementation detail of Cxx interop. When importing C++ namespaces
and their members, the Clang importer puts these declarations in the Clang
header import module (a.k.a. the bridging header module, `__ObjC`). C++
namespaces don't have a logical modular home in the Swift AST because they can
span multiple modules, so it's understandable why this implementation was
chosen. However, the concrete members of namespaces also get placed in the
`__ObjC` module too, and this really confuses things.
To work around this idiosyncrasy of Cxx interop, I've introduced
`Decl::getModuleContextForNameLookup()` which returns the module that a
declaration would ideally belong to if Cxx interop didn't have this behavior.
This alternative to `Decl::getModuleContext()` is now used everywhere that
`MemberImportVisibility` rules are enforced to provide consistency.
Additionally, I found that I also had to further special-case the header import
module for Cxx interop because it turns out that there are some additional
declarations, beyond imported namespaces, that also live there and need to be
implicitly visible in every source file. The `__ObjC` module is not implicitly
imported in source files when Cxx interop is enabled, so these declarations are
not deemed visible under normal name lookup rules. When I tried to add an
implicit import of `__ObjC` when Cxx interop is enabled, it broke a bunch
tests. So for now, when a decl really belongs to the `__ObjC` module in Cxx
interop mode, we just always allow it to be referenced.
This Cxx interop behavior really needs a re-think in my opinion, but that will
require larger discussions.
Resolves rdar://136600598.
The generality of the `AvailabilityContext` name made it seem like it
encapsulates more than it does. Really it just augments `VersionRange` with
additional set algebra operations that are useful for availability
computations. The `AvailabilityContext` name should be reserved for something
pulls together more than just a single version.
Some requirement machine work
Rename requirement to Value
Rename more things to Value
Fix integer checking for requirement
some docs and parser changes
Minor fixes
Allow any declaration to be marked with `@unsafe`, meaning that it
involves unsafe code. This also extends to C declarations marked with
the `swift_attr("unsafe")` attribute.
Under a separate experimental flag (`DisallowUnsafe`), diagnose any
attempt to use an `@unsafe` declaration or any unsafe language feature
(such as `unowned(unsafe)`, `@unchecked Sendable`). This begins to
define a "safe" mode in Swift that prohibits memory-unsafe constructs.
`@unknown default` in switch statements are required for resilient enums since they
might be modified with new fields in the future and modules defining the enums are
generally not built together with the consuming modules.
However, if the modules are in the same package, they are required to be built together,
thus the requirement for `@unknown default` can be skipped. This PR removes the need for
that, enabling less boilerplate. Note this change only impacts typecheck and not SIL gen.
Resolves rdar://130015149.
This makes sure that Swift respects `-Xcc -stdlib=libc++` flags.
Clang already has existing logic to discover the system-wide libc++ installation on Linux. We rely on that logic here.
Importing a Swift module that was built with a different C++ stdlib is not supported and emits an error.
The Cxx module can be imported when compiling with any C++ stdlib. The synthesized conformances, e.g. to CxxRandomAccessCollection also work. However, CxxStdlib currently cannot be imported when compiling with libc++, since on Linux it refers to symbols from libstdc++ which have different mangled names in libc++.
rdar://118357548 / https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/69825
Upstreams the necessary changes to compile references to `@backDeployed`
declarations correctly when a `macabi` target triple or a `-target-variant` is
specified.
There are a few spots in `ActorIsolationRequest` that produce
`unspecified` isolation with `preconcurrency` bit set and diagnostics
rely on that to make downgrade decisions in Swift 5 mode.
This reverts commit 0097ef68a6.
