with two kinds, and some more specific predicates that clients can use.
The notion of 'computed or not' isn't specific enough for how properties
are accessed. We already have problems with ObjC properties that are
stored but usually accessed through getters and setters, and a bool here
isn't helping matters.
NFC.
Swift SVN r12593
1. Implement parser and sema support for our subscript syntax proposal in
protocols. Now you have to use subscript(..) { get } or {get set} to
indicate what you want. I suspect that the syntax will evolve, but at
least we can express what we need now.
2. Change the representation of SubscriptDecls in protocols to make
(empty) funcdecls for the getter and setter. This guarantees that
every subscript has at least a getter.
Swift SVN r12555
Thanks to the way we've set up our diagnostics engine, there's not actually
a reason for /everything/ to get rebuilt when /one/ diagnostic changes.
I've split them up into five categories for now: Parse, Sema, SIL, IRGen,
and Frontend, plus a set of "Common" diagnostics that are used in multiple
areas of the compiler. We can massage this later.
No functionality change, but should speed up compile times!
Swift SVN r12438
When a class that will be allocated by the Objective-C runtime also
requires all of its stored properties have initial values, move that
complete initialization of the object into -.cxx_construct, which is
invoked by the runtime after +alloc.
Definite initialization doesn't like the resulting initializers (which
don't initialize any of their ivars) at all, so no end-to-end testing yet.
Swift SVN r12229
When we're using Objective-C's memory allocation, emit .cxx_construct
methods whenever we have instance variables with in-class
initializers. Presently, these methods are just empty stubs.
Swift SVN r12211
Instance variable destruction is handled separately by -.cxx_destruct,
and the message send to the superclass's -dealloc is handled by the
Objective-C runtime, so we only need to emit a -dealloc if there is
any user code in it.
Swift SVN r12210
The Objective-C runtime executes the .cxx_destruct method after the
last -dealloc has executed when destroying an object, allowing the
instance variables to remain live even after the subclass's
destructor/-dealloc has executed, which is important for memory
safety. This fixes the majority of <rdar://problem/15136592>.
Note that IRGenModule::getAddrOfIVarDestroyer() contains an egregious
hack to find the ivar destructor SIL function via a linear
search. We need a better way to find SIL functions that we know exist,
because LinkEntity does not suffice.
Swift SVN r12206
The Swift entry point is required for the Swift metadata, while the
Objective-C entry point goes into the Objective-C metadata. As part of
this, stop emitting the destroying destructor for classes that use
Objective-C allocation: it won't work anyway.
Swift SVN r12199
Because Objective-C doesn't have the notion of a destroying
destructor, this is a matter of cleanliness rather than
correctness. Still, it's better not to lie.
Swift SVN r12160
SILDeclRef was previously storing the ClassDecl for this case, because
semantic analysis didn't guarantee that a DestructorDecl was always
present. It is now, and this representation makes more sense.
Swift SVN r12122
Teach SILGen to emit a -dealloc method that runs user code, destroys
instance variables, and then calls up to the superclass dealloc. Teach
IRGen to deal with Objective-C destructor methods and add -dealloc to
the instance method table.
There are a few things still wrong here: we're emitting both a Swift
destructor and -dealloc, even though only one of them should ever
actually be used. Additionally, instance variables shouldn't be
destroyed in -dealloc, but in .cxx_destruct, so they persist until the
last of the -dealloc methods is invoked.
Swift SVN r12115
We use Objective-C allocation for classes whose root was defined in
Objective-C. Any Swift class whose root is defined in Swift will use
Swift's allocation routines instead.
Plus some minor cleanup in advance of implementing -dealloc.
Swift SVN r12104
In general, this forces SILGen and IRGen code that's grabbing
a declaration to state whether it's doing so to define it.
Change SIL serialization to serialize the linkage of functions
and global variables, which means also serializing declarations.
Change the deserializer to use this stored linkage, even when
only deserializing a declaration, and to call a callback to
inform the client that it has deserialized a new entity.
Take advantage of that callback in the linking pass to alter
the deserialized linkage as appropriate for the fact that we
imported the declaration. This computation should really take
advantage of the relationship between modules, but currently
it does not.
Swift SVN r12090
In nongeneric contexts, or contexts where we only care about the indirectness of parameters or have already substituted the generic parameters for a function, the interface types are interchangeable, so just switch over.
Swift SVN r12044
- Introduce a new TypeBase::getInOutObjectType() that strips off @inout types
- Switch stuff that is calling getRValueType() to call getInOutObjectType()
when they are stripping @inout, not @lvalue (this is primarily around
stuff working with self)
- Update testcases, some diagnostics improve around & handling.
This fixes rdar://15708430 and rdar://15729093.
Swift SVN r11794
with qualifiers on it, we have two distinct types:
- LValueType(T) aka @lvalue T, which is used for mutable values on the LHS of an
assignment in the typechecker.
- InOutType(T) aka @inout T, which is used for @inout arguments, and the implicit
@inout self argument of mutable methods on value types. This type is also used
at the SIL level for address types.
While I detangled a number of cases that were checking for LValueType (without checking
qualifiers) and only meant @inout or @lvalue, there is more to be done here. Notably,
getRValueType() still strips @inout, which is totally and unbearably wrong.
Swift SVN r11727
If there's no script-mode file in a module, don't produce a top_level_code SILFunction for it, and don't consider emitting an LLVM global_ctor for it. We should never emit static constructors from user code anymore.
Swift SVN r11644
(various) FunctionType::get's, ArrayType::get,
ArraySliceType::get, OptionalType::get, and a few
other places.
There is more to be done here, but this is all I plan to do
for now.
Swift SVN r11497
This removes an oddity in the AST whereby the 'self' declaration
within a value type constructor was not represented as @inout, despite
having @inout semantics in the language.
Swift SVN r11194
Check for a REPL SourceFileKind along with Main before going the lazy initialization path. Also put response variables in the REPL SourceFile decl context so they are recognized as REPL variables and not lazily initialized. Handle PatternBindingDecls that appear under a script-mode SourceFile decl context but not a TopLevelCodeDecl context.
Swift SVN r11133
Remove the initialize_var instruction now that DI fully diagnoses initialization problems. Change String-to-NSString bridging to explicitly invoke String's default constructor; it was the last remaining user of initialize_var. Remove dead code to emit an implicit default constructor without a body.
Swift SVN r11066
This gives more predictable semantics for initializers and destructors under the DI model, and also unblocks enabling the DI model at all for @objc initializers. <rdar://problem/15614052>
Swift SVN r11029
is used for VarDecls that are immutable once defined. This
will eventually be used to model 'val' in SILGen, but for now
we can use it to optimize some 'self' situations.
At present, we use it for class 'self' in destructors and for
init methods of root classes. The init methods of derived
classes need to be able to mutate self when calling super.init
so they can't use this presently. I haven't gotten around to
switching general methods to use it yet.
This introduces two new regressions that don't appear in the
testsuite: we lose debug info for "self" in this case, and
we cannot close over self.
Swift SVN r10962
This completes the FileUnit refactoring. A module consists of multiple
FileUnits, which provide decls from various file-like sources. I say
"file-like" because the Builtin module is implemented with a single
BuiltinUnit, and imported Clang modules are just a single FileUnit source
within a module.
Most modules, therefore, contain a single file unit; only the main module
will contain multiple source files (and eventually partial AST files).
The term "translation unit" has been scrubbed from the project. To refer
to the context of declarations outside of any other declarations, use
"top-level" or "module scope". To refer to a .swift file or its DeclContext,
use "source file". To refer to a single unit of compilation, use "module",
since the model is that an entire module will be compiled with a single
driver call. (It will still be possible to compile a single source file
through the direct-to-frontend interface, but only in the context of the
whole module.)
Swift SVN r10837
Part of the FileUnit restructuring. A Clang module (whether from a framework
or a simple collection of headers) is now imported as a TranslationUnit
containing a single ClangModuleUnit.
One wrinkle in all this is that Swift very much wants to do searches on a
per-module basis, but Clang can only do lookups across the entire
TranslationUnit. Unless and until we get a better way to deal with this,
we're stuck with an inefficiency here. Previously, we used to hack around
this by ignoring the "per-module" bit and only performing one lookup into
all Clang modules, but that's not actually correct with respect to visibility.
Now, we're just taking the filtering hit for looking up a particular name,
and caching the results when we look up everything (for code completion).
This isn't ideal, but it doesn't seem to be costing too much in performance,
at least not right now, and it means we can get visibility correct.
In the future, it might make sense to include a ClangModuleUnit alongside a
SerializedASTFile for adapter modules, rather than having two separate
modules with the same name. I haven't really thought through this yet, though.
Swift SVN r10834
Part of the FileUnit restructuring. A serialized module is now represented as
a TranslationUnit containing a single SerializedASTFile.
As part of this change, the FileUnit interface has been made virtual, rather
than switching on the Kind in every accessor. We think the operations
performed on files are sufficiently high-level that this shouldn't affect us.
A nice side effect of all this is that we now properly model the visibility
of modules imported into source files. Previously, we would always consider
the top-level imports of all files within a target, whether re-exported or
not.
We may still end up wanting to distinguish properties of a complete Swift
module file from a partial AST file, but we can do that within
SerializedModuleLoader.
Swift SVN r10832
The goal of this series of commits is to allow the main module to consist
of both source files and AST files, where the AST files represent files
that were already built and don't need to be rebuilt, or of Swift source
files and imported Clang headers that share a module (because they are in
the same target).
Currently modules are divided into different kinds, and that defines how
decls are looked up, how imports are managed, etc. In order to achieve the
goal above, that polymorphism should be pushed down to the individual units
within a module, so that instead of TranslationUnit, BuiltinModule,
SerializedModule, and ClangModule, we have SourceFile, BuiltinUnit,
SerializedFile, and ClangUnit. (Better names welcome.) At that point we can
hopefully collapse TranslationUnit into Module and make Module non-polymorphic.
This commit makes SourceFile the subclass of an abstract FileUnit, and
makes TranslationUnit hold an array of FileUnits instead of SourceFiles.
To demonstrate that this is actually working, the Builtin module has also
been converted to FileUnit: it is now a TranslationUnit containing a single
BuiltinUnit.
Swift SVN r10830
all we need to enable DI for enum constructors. Structs and classes are
more complex, and the diagnostic produced is not great. This resolves
rdar://14922277.
Also, now an unreachable code diagnostic (with no source location) is
produced when building the stdlib. I'll investigate.
Swift SVN r10725
