Files
swift-mirror/test/Constraints/rdar85263844_swift6.swift
Hamish Knight 5c3f6703a0 Remove diag::type_of_expression_is_ambiguous
This is a diagnostic that is only really emitted as a fallback when
the constraint system isn't able to better diagnose the expression.
It's not particulary helpful for the user, and can be often be
misleading since the underlying issue might not actually be an
ambiguity, and the user may well already have a type annotation. Let's
instead just emit the fallback diagnostic that we emit in all other
cases, asking the user to file a bug.
2025-08-19 17:14:23 +01:00

34 lines
1.2 KiB
Swift

// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift -swift-version 6
// rdar://85263844 - initializer 'init(_:)' requires the types be equivalent
func rdar85263844(arr: [(q: String, a: Int)]) -> AnySequence<(question: String, answer: Int)> {
AnySequence(arr.map { $0 })
// expected-error@-1 {{initializer 'init(_:)' requires the types '(question: String, answer: Int)' and '(q: String, a: Int)' be equivalent}}
}
// Another case for rdar://85263844
protocol P {
associatedtype Element
}
extension Array : P {}
public struct S4<T> {
init<S : P>(_ x: S) where S.Element == T {}
init(_ x: Int) {}
}
extension S4 where T == (outer: Int, y: Int) {
init(arr: [Int]) {
// FIXME: This ideally shouldn't compile either, but because of the way we
// generate constraints for it, it continues to compile. We should fix
// tuple subtyping for Swift 6 mode to not accept label mismatches.
self.init(arr.map { (inner: $0, y: $0) })
// expected-warning@-1 {{tuple conversion from '(inner: Int, y: Int)' to '(outer: Int, y: Int)' mismatches labels}}
}
}
public func rdar85263844_2(_ x: [Int]) -> S4<(outer: Int, y: Int)> {
// FIXME: Bad error message.
S4(x.map { (inner: $0, y: $0) }) // expected-error {{failed to produce diagnostic for expression}}
}